• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Opinion Wanted

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmac50
  • Start date Start date Oct 31, 2006
B

bmac50

New Member
Oct 18, 2006
123
0
0
Florida
Oct 31, 2006
#1
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #1
Which to do first, add MagnaFlow Catbacks or headers? Both will be done at some point and the the four cats have already been replaced by two higher preformance ones. Also headers will be short, equal and coated and would like recommendations on those also. Thanks!!!
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
559
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 31, 2006
#2
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #2
This is assuming that you are otherwise, "basically stock". Cat-back first. From what I've read here, headers really don't make a huge difference on a stock (or close to) combo. A cat-back does.

Guys will also say that a CAI won't do much good on a stock combo. I noticed a big difference in respose and fuel mileage. If you don't have one, get one. (About $40 on Ebay.)
 
B

bmac50

New Member
Oct 18, 2006
123
0
0
Florida
Oct 31, 2006
#3
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #3
Engine is stock for now and just about everything under the hood has been upgraded. K&N air intake, new injectors, wires, alternator, radiator, hoses, oil cooler, transmission cooler, battery, fuel pump, water pump under pullys and on and on. Was thinking the same order as you stated cats, headers and them intake maniford with cylinder heads to be followed by body work.
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Oct 31, 2006
#4
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #4
Cat back... I'm still running stock manifolds... they'll be upgraded when I rebuild the engine. Much easier to change when the engine is out of the car.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Oct 31, 2006
#5
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #5
cat back.. at least you can hear that difference...
 

1TallMF

New Member
Apr 17, 2006
955
1
0
Montreal
Oct 31, 2006
#6
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #6
A cat-back will give you at least a mild erection from the sound. Headers with an otherwise stock exhaust won't. Like you said, do cat-back, then crossover pipe, then headers. You'll be giggling like a schoolgirl in not time
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 31, 2006
#7
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #7
With a stock Stang ..............

You've already done the most effective thing .................

from a performance point of view ... that is

Don't expect much gain from a cb ..........
a hand full of horses ... at the most

If you were talking about LT's
then
I'd say you would get more noticeable gains from them than a cb

With shortys ... and you since you have already committed to a shorty style mid pipe ... you might as well go for the cb option that at least is gonna sound faster.

On a stock Stang ... exhaust mods just do not give much of a performance gain and considering how much you spend on them ... the gain for the buck is not all that hot as well IMHO.

btw ... I'd go regular shortys over equal length style shortys

Grady
 

1TallMF

New Member
Apr 17, 2006
955
1
0
Montreal
Oct 31, 2006
#8
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #8
final5-0 said:
btw ... I'd go regular shortys over equal length style shortys

Grady
Click to expand...

DEFFINETLY!!!

The extra 1hp from the EL's is NOT worth it
 
9

95five-oh

New Member
Jun 25, 2006
158
0
0
Mount Airy, MD
Oct 31, 2006
#9
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #9
My GT is basically stock too and i noticed almost no difference when i put my bbk shorties on...for $300 i'd say they were almost a complete waste of money. get a loud cat back and a cheap CAI.
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Oct 31, 2006
#10
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #10
Exhuast may not be the best bag for the buck but it sure does sound sweet, I just cant get enough of that sound, gotta get on it a few times every time i go out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
649
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
F
1990 mustang GT, essentials to making a 5,000 mile round trip (Michigan to California, and back)
  • FreeMustangProject
  • May 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
851
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 14, 2025
hoopty5.0
A
2020 Ford Mustang GT P0036, P0138, P0141 02 sensor help
  • AmkoA
  • Jul 29, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
305
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 5, 2025
skkrtis
S
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
685
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
334
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?