• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Opinions on fox vs SN95

  • Thread starter Thread starter 87lc2
  • Start date Start date Feb 28, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 2, 2007
#21
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #21
The SN will be more solid feeling (even with the same mileage) and handle better. The fox will be lighter and will respond to smaller mods better. Its more or less about what YOU want, but I personally Like my sisters 94 better than my 89!
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 2, 2007
#22
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #22
87lc2 said:
was looking at a 94....ive been driving my 91 for about 2 years now with no major problems, just found a super nice 94 gt for a great price and wanted some opinions from people who have owned both.
Click to expand...

If this was directed at me, I have an 88 GT vert and a 94 GT.

That was where my opinion was coming from.

The one caveat with the 94-95 non-cobra processors is that they can be a PITA to work with. The processor itself is a great piece but the factory tune blows. The majority of 94-95 guys with any sorts of mods (especially more radical cams) have an RT or means of tuning the car. It's not a biggie to work around however.

Good luck with your decision.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Mar 2, 2007
#23
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #23
HISSIN50 said:
What year of SN are you thinking of getting?
Click to expand...

87lc2 said:
was looking at a 94...
Click to expand...

HISSIN50 said:
If this was directed at me, I have an 88 GT vert and a 94 GT.

That was where my opinion was coming from.
Click to expand...

I think he was just answering your question. And clarifying(for all of us, perhaps) what kind of insight he was looking for.

:SNSign:
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 2, 2007
#24
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #24
My sister has a 94 and we have had a FEW 87-93s and I can say the 94 feels better, handles better, and just seems like a better car! The fox is the kind of car you will work on and not worry about the effects of it, whereas the SN is the car that feels better stock and after working on and making faster will feel more harsh and might feel worse.

Personally looks are subjective, the SN will seem tighter and more solid, but the fox will be the car you dont mind working on. It depends on what you really want, and how far you want to take the mods! Personally to ME its a toss up between the two but you cant go wrong with either!!!
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Mar 2, 2007
#25
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #25
I've had both, and still have my 95. The Fox was definitely lighter and felt more nimble, but the SN handles much better and would make a better DD (it served me as my DD for 4 years). As JT pointed out, the stock tune in the GT does suck, but mine hasn't given me any problems with the cam as of yet, save for some occasional bucking when I'm cruising, which is easily solved by giving it a little more or less gas. I'm thinking about picking up a notch to make a weekend warrior out of, that'll probably get a cage, and be very user-unfriendly. I'd say the Fox is best suited for an all-out go fast car, where the SN is better suited to some go-fast mods, but more of a street than strip car.
 

hsean

10 Year Member
Jul 24, 2006
656
69
69
dearborn,michigan
Mar 2, 2007
#26
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #26
its funny i own 2 foxes and my wife thinks they both look hidious but when i have showed her pics of the sn's she likes that design .everyone has an opinion on what looks nice or not.alot times being in my late thirties going back in time and being around foxbodies foureyed and such you can't help be be biased.i just soured on them although i do love the interiors in them .i just felt they could have come up with something with a wider wheel base and more horsepower.
 
G

greenstang1313

New Member
Jun 15, 2005
158
0
0
Chelmsford, MA
Mar 2, 2007
#27
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #27
I'm an SN95 guy (strictly 94-95 though) for these reasons:
-they still have the 5.0, they reprisent the old school rule with new school cool
-the interiors were designed to look like a cockpit, i think the interiors are perfect (probably why they didnt change them for 10 years, 94-04
-just as easy to make fast as a fox
-everyone knows SN's as stupid v6 chick cars so when they see/hear my cammed 94 cobra with full exhaust comin down the street they really stop what theyre doin and look
-with a set of rims, tinted windows, and a nice drop, they can be pure sex on wheels

Foxes are sick too though, my fantasy car is a black '93 Cobra with a fully built 427ci.
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Mar 2, 2007
#28
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #28
I'd just like to continue to crap on the 94-98...

They are overweight and look like overweight teenage girl cars.

However, I own a 2001 GT and I love it for DD. I would lose it in a heartbeat if it came between it and my 93 fox though.

That is all.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Mar 2, 2007
#29
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #29
i always like the weight statements were not talking about a lot of weight difference my 93 vert outweights the 94 coupe.... and i have never sat in any fox compared to sn95 and said ih yeah i can tell that extra weight is really hurting this car i noticed no difference in response or driveability except the sn seemed to be better stock.

as mentioned a lot of people dislike fox cars...my woman hated mine with a passion....after the 18" and such she thinks its alright....i think its easier to make a fox look good... but after the 14k invested in my fox i bought my 94 and was soo pissed at myself...it handled just as good felt so much better and the power felt so good for being a stock car..

i wish i would have got my 94 first i probley would never be in the fox game if i found it first...i think as far as a all around car the 94-95 are awesome...and with wheels , lowering and tint they look so much sexier IMO plus being able to put a 315 out back with no type of problem is great they can look so tough
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,942
224
Massachusetts
Mar 2, 2007
#30
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #30
I own both and my opinion is this

SN95 > Fox


However if it came down to my '88 5.0 and my '03 GT and one had to go...the Gt would go. I would miss tghe hell out of it though.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Mar 2, 2007
#31
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #31
if you notice all the members that have owned both feel stronger to the sn cars
 
M

Mustangfan84

Member
Mar 21, 2019
3
1
13
D’Iberville, MS
Oct 22, 2020
#32
  • Oct 22, 2020
  • #32
Which offers more back seat room?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,942
224
Massachusetts
Oct 22, 2020
#33
  • Oct 22, 2020
  • #33
Mustang5L5 said:
I own both and my opinion is this

SN95 > Fox


However if it came down to my '88 5.0 and my '03 GT and one had to go...the Gt would go. I would miss tghe hell out of it though.
Click to expand...

This post was from 2007. Guess which one did go? The 03 GT is gone, but I do miss it.


Mustangfan84 said:
Which offers more back seat room?
Click to expand...

My fox hatchback had more rear seat headroom than my '03 GT did. Legroom is about the same as the floorpan and seats are pretty much the same.
 
Last edited: Oct 22, 2020
Reactions: Shakerhood and Mustangfan84
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Oct 22, 2020
#34
  • Oct 22, 2020
  • #34
It's funny reading all the talk about which is the better daily driver. Does anyone still daily drive a fox?
 

HemiRick

I'd be looking at jacking under the house
Jun 28, 2020
723
272
73
Memphis TN
Oct 23, 2020
#35
  • Oct 23, 2020
  • #35
I do. I work on cars for a living and I'll never own a car newer than my Fox, just 1 computer to run the engine. These newer cars that use a 'puter for literally everything, I'll never own one. And I like computers !
 

ThinBlue502

5 Year Member
May 7, 2019
407
720
113
Ohio
Oct 23, 2020
#36
  • Oct 23, 2020
  • #36

Two foxes that are nearly daily driven in southern Ohio. I only drive my truck when it’s raining cats and dogs or there is snow on the ground.
 
Reactions: Shakerhood

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,942
224
Massachusetts
Oct 23, 2020
#37
  • Oct 23, 2020
  • #37
HemiRick said:
I do. I work on cars for a living and I'll never own a car newer than my Fox, just 1 computer to run the engine. These newer cars that use a 'puter for literally everything, I'll never own one. And I like computers !
Click to expand...

That's funny. I'm the opposite. I like all the newer computers on a car. Easy to hook up a laptop and troubleshoot without ever having to pop the hood. I've done some cool stuff on my DD just by plugging in a laptop. I'm finding myself getting very turned off when I have to turn a wrench these days


emagdnim said:
It's funny reading all the talk about which is the better daily driver. Does anyone still daily drive a fox?
Click to expand...

I can only speak to my local area, but for the most part Foxes aren't daily driven due to the environment. Older cars are virtually non-existent on the roads due to the corrosive salt used. Usually this runs Dec-April so a good chunk of the year they just dump tons of salt on the road that can linger late into the spring if we don't get any heavy rains. Daily driven foxes just rotted out by now and are long good. In our local club, every fox body is either a low-mileage survivor, or a modified garage queen that only comes out when it's sunny. There may be an example or two that get driven frequently in the summer, but most fox owners here have them as a second toy car. It's been 10-15 years since I've known of anyone using it as their only car.

Other parts of the country obviously have different circumstances. It amazes me when i can see a 300K mile southern car not have a spec of rust on it and solid frame rails. So jealous.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Oct 23, 2020
#38
  • Oct 23, 2020
  • #38
ThinBlue502 said:

Two foxes that are nearly daily driven in southern Ohio. I only drive my truck when it’s raining cats and dogs or there is snow on the ground.
Click to expand...
Nice!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which SN95 axles for 93 LX, disc brakes, ABS rings?
  • dan50
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
446
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
C
Fox Need help identifying brake setup
  • Cypher02xd
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
146
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2026
Mustang5L5
T
Fox Convertible top issues
  • TDM389
  • Feb 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
315
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2026
General karthief
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
408
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?