• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Opinions on street car motors

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbonella
  • Start date Start date Nov 18, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 23, 2009
#61
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #61
89stang1 said:
good article read it all unless u know it all............i know magazines are liars too .......i dont mind trading 25rwhp for 25rwt especially down mid to low end for a street ride. Articles right on the money my stang is proof i go out almost everyday to enjoy it without going over 5500 rpms something thats gonna keep my stock block and hyd roller valve train around for a long time

Super Intake Shootout - Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords
Click to expand...

This..
Seeing as how my motor coming together slowly(WAY TO SLOWLY) is getting a s trim, I'm not so much worried about high rpm hp. Just want to make sure I can hit the tires off the line.
To the OP, both TMOSS and fox lake both do porting on your lower. Fox lake's is much more intensive if you want it to be(involving welding, etc..), but people love TMOSS ported lowers. IIRC, TMOSS charges about $150 to port the lower. Worth giving a shot and seeing if you like it before you go all out and buy a new intake. If you don't like it, I'll buy it. I still haven't sent out my gt40 lower yet.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Nov 23, 2009
#62
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #62
90lxcoupe said:
Must be that new england air
Click to expand...

Yeah, must not be "dyno air".
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Nov 23, 2009
#63
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #63
25thmustang said:
Dyno numbers... I know a few cars that look slow on the dyno, not so slow in the real world.

Click to expand...

90lxcoupe said:
Must be that new england air
Click to expand...
Come on guys, we all know it's not dyno numbers OR track times that matter. Ignorance is bliss. THINKING you know everything is enough to make most people happy.
strtrcr50 said:
This..
Seeing as how my motor coming together slowly(WAY TO SLOWLY) is getting a s trim, I'm not so much worried about high rpm hp. Just want to make sure I can hit the tires off the line.
To the OP, both TMOSS and fox lake both do porting on your lower. Fox lake's is much more intensive if you want it to be(involving welding, etc..), but people love TMOSS ported lowers. IIRC, TMOSS charges about $150 to port the lower. Worth giving a shot and seeing if you like it before you go all out and buy a new intake. If you don't like it, I'll buy it. I still haven't sent out my gt40 lower yet.
Click to expand...
Soooo, you're running a centrifugal supercharger and don't care about high rpm power... That makes less sense than putting a gt40 on a 351. High rpm is how that kind of blower works.

I wouldn't spend $150 to buy a gt40 intake, nevermind waste on porting the junk.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 23, 2009
#64
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #64
Wow, this thread turned into a pissing match real quick. I like how EVERYBODY has a chip on their shoulder over someone else's motor.


blackened88lx said:
Come on guys, we all know it's not dyno numbers OR track times that matter. Ignorance is bliss. THINKING you know everything is enough to make most people happy.

Soooo, you're running a centrifugal supercharger and don't care about high rpm power... That makes less sense than putting a gt40 on a 351. High rpm is how that kind of blower works.

I wouldn't spend $150 to buy a gt40 intake, nevermind waste on porting the junk.
Click to expand...

In comparison to a roots or twin screw, yes. But a centri can be made to work on a low-revving street motor in the same way a turbo can- by sizing the supercharger, spinning it at the right speed, and matching the right components together. Its not a stretch either, otherwise Paxton, Vortech, etc wouldn't offer them for stock motor 302s.


Anyway, I think the GT-40 intake argument is starting to be pretty compelling right now. At first I was against it, but now I'm curious to see what a fully ported unit could do on a 357.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Nov 23, 2009
#65
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #65
NikwoaC said:
Wow, this thread turned into a pissing match real quick. I like how EVERYBODY has a chip on their shoulder over someone else's motor.

Anyway, I think the GT-40 intake argument is starting to be pretty compelling right now. At first I was against it, but now I'm curious to see what a fully ported unit could do on a 357.
Click to expand...

nevermind
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Nov 25, 2009
#66
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #66
NikwoaC said:
Wow, this thread turned into a pissing match real quick. I like how EVERYBODY has a chip on their shoulder over someone else's motor.




In comparison to a roots or twin screw, yes. But a centri can be made to work on a low-revving street motor in the same way a turbo can- by sizing the supercharger, spinning it at the right speed, and matching the right components together. Its not a stretch either, otherwise Paxton, Vortech, etc wouldn't offer them for stock motor 302s.


Anyway, I think the GT-40 intake argument is starting to be pretty compelling right now. At first I was against it, but now I'm curious to see what a fully ported unit could do on a 357.
Click to expand...

I AGREE SO WOULD I
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Nov 25, 2009
#67
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #67
Cobra vs. GT40 vs. Explorer shootout
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 25, 2009
#68
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #68
Notchbck93 said:
Cobra vs. GT40 vs. Explorer shootout
Click to expand...

Ahh, I've been looking for something like that for a LONG time! Look at that, the Explorer hangs right in there with the other two manifolds. We need to save that for all the Explorer nay-sayers. If anything, the tubular manifold seems to flow a little less than the cast manifolds.
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Nov 25, 2009
#69
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #69
NikwoaC said:
Ahh, I've been looking for something like that for a LONG time! Look at that, the Explorer hangs right in there with the other two manifolds. We need to save that for all the Explorer nay-sayers. If anything, the tubular manifold seems to flow a little less than the cast manifolds.
Click to expand...

I knew someone would appreciated it, especially with how many Explorer intake threads I see floating about on Stangnet.

The aluminum uppers allow someone to extrude hone them (hopefully the lower as well) where as the GT40 is limited by the "tubes."

9 times out of 10...extrude honed parts beat ported parts...heads, intake manifolds, you name it.

Here's a cobra intake combo

Cobra Updates

Marc Arnold's follow up about extrude honing and the hp gainged...
extrude hone - SVTPerformance

"I had my intake Extrude Honed back in 1999 with this combo:
http://www.andersonfordmotorsport.co...rnold-302.html

"We saw about 8 rwhp on my car. Worth it is a relative term. At the time I was trying to eek out every last n/a hp from my combo with the stock shortblock and still keeping emissons compliance. To me, it was worth it to keep the stock look. It was very expensive though, around $475 if memory serves."

Even Marc recommended t-moss.
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Nov 25, 2009
#70
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #70
Cobra combo that has been extrude honed

1993 Ford Mustang Cobra - Muscle Car Review - Mustang Monthly


Extrude honed lower vs non.



How to tune and modify your 5L loves the regular Edel performer manifold for the street.
How to tune & modify your 5L--intake comparo
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Nov 25, 2009
#71
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #71
Getting the most out of a car and having something that satisfies you are two 100% totally different things. The guy looking for the most won't be running that intake on a stroker 351. The guy who wants to have a car he enjoys, likes the look of the intake and already owns one... he would run it.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 25, 2009
#72
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #72
25thmustang said:
Getting the most out of a car and having something that satisfies you are two 100% totally different things. The guy looking for the most won't be running that intake on a stroker 351. The guy who wants to have a car he enjoys, likes the look of the intake and already owns one... he would run it.
Click to expand...

Well said. :Word:
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Dec 2, 2009
#73
  • Dec 2, 2009
  • #73
OK Cats, here's the deal... MM&FF 1997 tech guide shows the difference between a tubular GT-40 non-ported lower and ported (extrude honed) lower in flow numbers.

Stock lower flows up to 215 cfm

Extrude honed lower 295 cfm

Total intake upper and lower run on flow bench

stock flowed a total of 238 cfm

Ported lower flowed a total of 271

They did not lose any low-end grunt and gained all around by doing this mod.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
973
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
597
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?