If Kerry is the answer...
Then it must have been a stupid question.
The war in Iraq is necessary. Why you ask? Because the way I see it, Sadam was exactly like Hitler. Power, Money, evil (mass graves). Sadam had a person killed if he said his name in public. If we did not take Sadam out of power, I could totally see WWIII coming. Sadam had the power and DID produce weapons of mass destruction. He used biological weapons on his own people, thats a fact. Sadam harbored terrorists, and could have given BinLaden weapons (which he would then use on us). You see, it all comes back to terrorists, not typically BinLaden so the war in Iraq was in the right direction with the fight against terrorism. Kerry focuses on BinLaden. To him he was the only threat. What about the rest of the Middle East. Is there only one mastermind behind all of terrorism? No.
I'm not a biased Republican because I listen to both of thier views. The thing is, Kerry has none. He doesn't stand on his own point of view and lets the public sway him for votes. Bush stands by his decision whether people like it or not. What we need in america is not a flip flopper, but a leader.