• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

painless wiring vs. stock wiring

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67gt390
  • Start date Start date Feb 26, 2006
6

67gt390

New Member
Jan 29, 2006
22
0
0
Salt Lake City, UT
Feb 26, 2006
#1
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #1
I am working on a major rebuild of my 67 Fastback. After four years of being in pieces and a trip to the sandblaster the wiring must be redone (it was bad to begin with). I am paying a resto shop by the hour so time to install is important. What system gives best bang for buck and ease of installation? The three systems I have seen are

1. Stock harness
2. Painless wiring
3. I-squared
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 26, 2006
#2
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #2
Painless and the stock wiring harnesses when brand new take about the same time to install if you are talking about the painless kit that is built for your car. Otherwise the universal kit is going to take longer to install then the stock replacement type that painless sells. I've never seen the isquared kit installed on a real car before.
 
J

John Z

Founding Member
Sep 21, 2000
581
0
0
Morgantown WV
Feb 26, 2006
#3
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #3
If you trust the guys at the shop, this would be a good question to discuss with them. I hate it when I take a part to a shop and hear "We can make this work but it would have been better if you bought...."
If you're not comfortable discussing such things with the shop guys, you need a new shop.
 
6

67gt390

New Member
Jan 29, 2006
22
0
0
Salt Lake City, UT
Feb 26, 2006
#4
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #4
The shop is only familiar with the stock harness. I am doing EFI and sigificant hidden audio upgrades so I thought painless may be a better solution. I didn't realize the painless system took the same amount of time to install.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 27, 2006
#5
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #5
Remember that painless makes a kit specific to your car and a kit that is a generic type. The generic type takes longer to install. Since you are going EFI it may be better for you overall to go with an 18 circuit painless kit. Other opinions on this would be welcome.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
809
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Electrical Gurus: Check Engine Light Wiring for 91 LX
  • Husky44
  • Nov 11, 2021
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox Engine Swaparoo Nov 18, 2021
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?