• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Paint hows it look

  • Thread starter Thread starter krallman
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Apr 8, 2007
#21
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #21
x20000 to nice to be one
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Apr 8, 2007
#22
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #22
WOW...thats sexy.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Apr 8, 2007
#23
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #23
nice
 
K

krallman

New Member
Mar 3, 2006
96
0
0
Hurricane, WV
Apr 8, 2007
#24
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #24
yeah im losing the ten holes for bart racing wheels that are getting wrapped with goodyear circle track slicks. As for the strips down the front i wanted to try something different. I kinda messed them up a little bit but if i would have ran them all the way down they would get all messed up pushing the camaros and monte carlos around the track. yeah as soon as i get my numbers wheels and decals on i will put some more pictures up. I felt bad for this car because it was in almost perfect condition to restore. It just needed paint. I got it for $900. Never been wrecked almost perfect interior, but it was the cfi crap with an aod. I got it for $900. Until i get enough money saved up to build the 302 i gotta run the 289 out of my 65 with a c-4.
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
Apr 8, 2007
#25
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #25
krallman said:
yeah im losing the ten holes for bart racing wheels that are getting wrapped with goodyear circle track slicks. As for the strips down the front i wanted to try something different. I kinda messed them up a little bit but if i would have ran them all the way down they would get all messed up pushing the camaros and monte carlos around the track. yeah as soon as i get my numbers wheels and decals on i will put some more pictures up. I felt bad for this car because it was in almost perfect condition to restore. It just needed paint. I got it for $900. Never been wrecked almost perfect interior, but it was the cfi crap with an aod. I got it for $900. Until i get enough money saved up to build the 302 i gotta run the 289 out of my 65 with a c-4.
Click to expand...

ouch. hurts. hurts bad. actually it almost pisses me off. $900 for it a CLEAN and RARE 85 GT and you tore out the PERFECT interior and are prepared to bash the hell out of it on the racetrack. at least swap it to aero nose before you tear up that mint GT bumper cover!
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Apr 8, 2007
#26
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #26
QUICK91LX said:
ouch. hurts. hurts bad. actually it almost pisses me off. $900 for it a CLEAN and RARE 85 GT and you tore out the PERFECT interior and are prepared to bash the hell out of it on the racetrack. at least swap it to aero nose before you tear up that mint GT bumper cover!
Click to expand...

very true.... it wouldnt be 1/10th as bad if it werent such a rare car, which is now going to be just that much more rare..


still kinda cant wait to see the new pics though!
 
K

krallman

New Member
Mar 3, 2006
96
0
0
Hurricane, WV
Apr 8, 2007
#27
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #27
actually the bumper cover was a little beat up and had some cracks in it. I didn't think that this car was that rare. It was slow as hell when i drove it home. lol. it took all it had to chirp the tires. I didnt really think anyone would want the cfi stuff.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Apr 8, 2007
#28
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #28
cfi car 85 gt? wow.. you just threw away a seriously low production stang.. retard
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Apr 8, 2007
#29
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #29
easy on name calling...doesnt deserve that
 
K

krallman

New Member
Mar 3, 2006
96
0
0
Hurricane, WV
Apr 8, 2007
#30
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #30
does anyone know the production number of the cfi car. I looked but couldnt find how many cfi's were produced.
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Apr 8, 2007
#31
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #31
krallman said:
does anyone know the production number of the cfi car. I looked but couldnt find how many cfi's were produced.
Click to expand...

less then 1,000 were built i belive...not 100% sure but that what i saw at the swap meet....

the CFI cars did suck performance wise....look at it this way....

1....its got a slick paint job....
2....its in the hands of a mustang fan...
3....its not being raced on a dirt track..


edit...CIRCLE TRACK!!!! WTF ARE YOU THINKING????

BUY A CAMARO FOR THAT ****
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Apr 9, 2007
#32
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #32
guys that are upset: trade him a clean 4 banger stang for the GT :dunno:
 
K

krallman

New Member
Mar 3, 2006
96
0
0
Hurricane, WV
Apr 9, 2007
#33
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #33
i think its too far along for a trade, but i did put on my emblems today and the hood and hatch pins. Picked up my tires, so when i get my rims within the next two weeks and get my decals next week ill put some more up. can't wait till april 21st for the first practice.
 

jfran430

New Member
Jan 8, 2007
36
0
0
Connecticut
Apr 9, 2007
#34
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #34
Bad92GT said:
cfi car 85 gt? wow.. you just threw away a seriously low production stang.. retard
Click to expand...

ooo someone is pretty edgy ..
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Apr 10, 2007
#35
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #35
DMAN302 said:
Picky part of me sees fisheyes in the second pic and a need for some serious wetsand time. Mustang part of me overlooks the imperfections and sees a gorgeous four eye.
Click to expand...

I don't want to start anything, but it takes a lot of balls to say something like this about a car that someone is refinishing. Especially before you see the finished product. Obviously, it is still in the works.

I do a lot of paint work myself, and I think that your car looks great! I like the color of the stripes and the way you ran them over the bumper! It is unique and it will really turn heads!! Keep us updated!!!!
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Apr 10, 2007
#36
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #36
Good bye poor 85


But it sure does look good

 

MeanGreen

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
1,160
1
39
Apr 10, 2007
#37
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #37
Gorgeous!! I love new paint and just how "WET" it looks sitting there!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
513
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Hit something exiting
  • Creomod
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
549
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Might as well start a progress thread on my 92 GT Hatch.
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 8, 2025
Dontknowchit
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
300
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
3
Fox 351 dipstick showing overfull?
  • 387lx
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
138
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?