• Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information

Passed Emissions

  • Thread starter Thread starter 352Ford2
  • Start date Start date May 19, 2006

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
May 19, 2006
#1
  • May 19, 2006
  • #1
Well I took my 88LX that has 242,000 miles and no cats, egr, or smog pump on it to the emissions station today and passed by a fair amount. It wasen't even running perfectly.

I was a little woried, because they made me turn it off right before I did the test (its got leaky valve guides/seals) good thing that puff of blue smoke cleared out fast
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
May 19, 2006
#2
  • May 19, 2006
  • #2
Do you have any mods to it? peace



john
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
May 20, 2006
#3
  • May 20, 2006
  • #3
Nah, the engine is essentialy dead stock, but is going to get swaped out soon for a fresher more powerfull one
 
W

wazazzle

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
618
1
0
In the dumpster behind McDonalds. WA
May 21, 2006
#4
  • May 21, 2006
  • #4
Congrats man! And good news for me Where did you take it at? I've been debating whether to re-register back at my old address in a non-emiss county. Did you do anything in particular to get it cleaner... like acetone, octane booster, etc?
 

74courier

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
158
0
0
vancouver wa
May 21, 2006
#5
  • May 21, 2006
  • #5
ima try to get mine through with just cats and a good tune hope i can pull it off
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
May 21, 2006
#6
  • May 21, 2006
  • #6
I took it to the station that is on aroura and about 120th. I was runing 87 arco gas and no additives
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
May 21, 2006
#7
  • May 21, 2006
  • #7
wazazzle said:
Congrats man! And good news for me Where did you take it at? I've been debating whether to re-register back at my old address in a non-emiss county. Did you do anything in particular to get it cleaner... like acetone, octane booster, etc?
Click to expand...

Don't use octane booster. I was able to drop the CO emissions by 80% with a gallon of methyl alcohol and timing at TDC. I know people use iysopropl (sp?) alcohol too, but you need to be sure you get the stuff that is 99% pure. Otherwise it has too much water.

You should avoid emssions if you can. The state is tightening the noose, though, so I do not know how much longer that will be possible. That is why I detuned my 11 second car. I want it to be emissions capable. The system irritates the social scientist in me because it falls hardest on those least capable of dealing with the additional financial and loss-of-time burdens, and makes them victims of unscrupulous shops. Now that I have gone through the process, I see how it works more clearly. Just call around to check the prices on aftermarket cats (more than $200.+ installation). Then look them up at Summit ($59) What a money tree for Midas and other chain shops like it. Those of us who know cars and have connections are able to save and avoid some of the victimization. I am not criticizing the need for clean air or reducing emissions, but how about making exhaust analyzers available to the public so we can tune our cars and get the emissions down without a third party?

I bought an old car to avoid future emissions, but I have not forgotten Murphy's Law: No one's life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session. =The laws could change.
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
May 21, 2006
#8
  • May 21, 2006
  • #8
74courier said:
ima try to get mine through with just cats and a good tune hope i can pull it off
Click to expand...

Your sig specifies an '80 Mustang. How old does a car need to be to avoid emissions in Oregon?
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
May 21, 2006
#9
  • May 21, 2006
  • #9
352Ford2 said:
Well I took my 88LX that has 242,000 miles and no cats, egr, or smog pump on it to the emissions station today and passed by a fair amount. It wasen't even running perfectly.

I was a little woried, because they made me turn it off right before I did the test (its got leaky valve guides/seals) good thing that puff of blue smoke cleared out fast
Click to expand...

The sniffer doesn't register oil.
 

74courier

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
158
0
0
vancouver wa
May 21, 2006
#10
  • May 21, 2006
  • #10
stock50LX said:
Your sig specifies an '80 Mustang. How old does a car need to be to avoid emissions in Oregon?
Click to expand...
as far as i know its 1980down in the south valley and 1975down in the north valley but people are telling me they raised it to 80 up here but i doubt it. if all else fails ill probly just get a real 5.0 car mine was a 4 banger to start with anyways
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
May 21, 2006
#11
  • May 21, 2006
  • #11
stock50LX said:
The sniffer doesn't register oil.
Click to expand...



oil should show up as hydrocarbon since that is what it is
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
May 21, 2006
#12
  • May 21, 2006
  • #12
352Ford2 said:
oil should show up as hydrocarbon since that is what it is
Click to expand...

You are right with regards to the original source (petrochemicals) but hydrocarbons are unburned fuel. The oil burners you see going down the road with plumes of blue smoke from the tailpipe will likely pass emissions. I had a 73 Mustang that was going through a quart every 80 miles, and it passed.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
May 22, 2006
#13
  • May 22, 2006
  • #13
stock50LX said:
You are right with regards to the original source (petrochemicals) but hydrocarbons are unburned fuel. The oil burners you see going down the road with plumes of blue smoke from the tailpipe will likely pass emissions. I had a 73 Mustang that was going through a quart every 80 miles, and it passed.
Click to expand...


Hmm, must be something to do with their sensor. Oil really isn't that much diffrent than gasoline (just a little lower on the distilation table). A car blowing out a ton of blue smoke shouldn't be any beter than a car blowing out tons of black smoke. Both are tons of hydrocarbons leaving the exaust pipe, I am going too look into that at work tomorro.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
285
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
Help! Intake Manifold Gasket or Head Gasket?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
95 Laser GT Ver
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?