• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Paxton Supercharger.

  • Thread starter Thread starter sport200
  • Start date Start date May 7, 2015
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#1
  • May 7, 2015
  • #1
Hey, guys it been a while.. I'm putting a Paxton supercharger on my 86GT. I know its a old school set up, but I like old school. it matches the era of the car. I've got a good idea on a tune set up , but if any one has any pointers I'm open. I've got 24lbs injectors, 190l in tank pump stock rails and lines. fuel FMU with a 24lb disk in it,(the FMU is the only thing I don't know about.... timing s set at 10degrees. fuel presser is 42 with line off. I have a one step colder plug in it. it is a 306 ci , dart head , 10:1 compression , long tube header, GT/40 upper and lower. 70mm pro m , crane cam 544/544 288/288. blower makes 6-8 psi. anything will help thanks guys.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,491
8,734
234
S.I.NY
May 7, 2015
#2
  • May 7, 2015
  • #2
That's a lot of compression to play games with a 190lph pump 24s and a fmu . Personally that car needs 42s a 340 in tank pump , ditch the fmu and a real tune ESP with all that compression . And maybe a meth kit to keep the detonation down . @84Ttop what say you ?


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers while my auto correct makes me seem illiterate
 
Last edited: May 7, 2015
Reactions: A5literMan and MY 85 GT

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
May 7, 2015
#3
  • May 7, 2015
  • #3
I have an old school Paxton on my wifes 91 z28 350 TPI car had paradise wheels go over the blower and he upgraded the impeller for a few PSI more...what i would do is get yourself an Air fuel gauge and see where your at in Boost you might be rich or Lean that way you can play around with the FMU discs...or down the road get yourself a tune where they can get rid of the FMU totally....
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#4
  • May 7, 2015
  • #4
I don't like the FMU set up. I have a auto meter air fuel gauge in the car in podded with my fuel presser gauge. Funny I just got it back from paradise wheels. He went through the whole thing , I'm putting a oil cooler on it is my next step after the track run on Friday. it feels good on the street. thanks for the info.
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    52.6 KB · Views: 267
Reactions: MY 85 GT

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
May 7, 2015
#5
  • May 7, 2015
  • #5
Yes i bought the oil cooler for her car too...Also bought a snow performance Meth kit for added protection...i do have an FMU on hers but GMs stink for tuning...so i really dont know how to do it other then an FMU i know i can go bigger injectors but dont know anyone who can tune for that on her car so im limited...lol i just go off the Wide band to make sure its running rich/safe...
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#6
  • May 7, 2015
  • #6
I'm starting to worry a bit about the same thing. I've had 150 wet shot of NOS on this same set up. It loved it. but I'm learning more and more about nitrous and blowers. I guess theirs a big differences. it seems to be fat to me.. but it has a great chance to run out of fuel I guess.
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
May 7, 2015
#7
  • May 7, 2015
  • #7
I would go with a bigger fuel pump...get a tune and bigger injectors..thats me tho...
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
May 7, 2015
#8
  • May 7, 2015
  • #8
TOOLOW91 said:
That's a lot of compression to play games with a 190lph pump 24s and a fmu . Personally that car needs 42s a 340 in tank pump , ditch the fmu and a real time ESP with all that compression . And maybe a meth kit to keep the detonation down . @84Ttop what say you ?


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers while my auto correct makes me seem illiterate
Click to expand...
I agree that the 190lph pump is not going to cut it... As recommended I would look towards a 340lph pump and 42lb injectors, all while ditching the FMU. As far as the compression goes, it's doable just narrows the tuning window a bit. I would be curious to see how much total timing you have in the motor as you won't get away with much before you start burning rings or melting ring lands. Keep in mind that the older ball drive units (I'm assuming that this is what we are talking about here) are not nearly as efficient as the newer centrifugals, the inlet temps will be notable higher and this is where you'll run into your biggest problems. Secondly, are you using a bypass valve? I would suggest it for sure if you currently don't have one installed. Is the autometer gauge a wide band or narrow band?
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#9
  • May 7, 2015
  • #9
Yes on the bypass valve. and not for sure on the wide or narrow band? total timing its set at 10 dergees with the plug out.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
May 7, 2015
#10
  • May 7, 2015
  • #10
sport200 said:
Yes on the bypass valve. and not for sure on the wide or narrow band? total timing its set at 10 dergees with the plug out.
Click to expand...
Does the afr gauge read on a scale from 10-15 or is it lean/stoich/rich?
With the spout connector out your base timing is at 10 degrees, this is not your total timing. Total timing is what the computer is allowing the car to see when under load, it uses the base timing you set with the spout out as part of the equation. Before you go trashing this motor I would strongly recommend having a chip burned for it or invest in a BTM, you will find that while the motor runs good on the stock timing values I can assure you that it won't run like that for long.
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#11
  • May 7, 2015
  • #11
lean/stoich/rich. It has a s93 computer in it out of a 93 cobra. I live in the Cincinnati area. I don't know if anyone in the area burns chips. ill look in to it thanks a ton.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 7, 2015
#12
  • May 7, 2015
  • #12
That old ball driver charger would come anywhere close to the need for 42lb/hr injectors, or a 340lph pump.....but they can be installed regarless.

I guess I'm one of the few that doesn't see an issue with the 190lph pump or the 24lb/hr injectors/FMU combination.

The pump itself has show to handle over 570hp N/A.....Even with 6-8psi on tap (which is really pushing it with this blower), so he should be well within safe limits. The Allen guys used to run 6-7psi all day with FMU, stock injectors and a 190lph pump. The 9psi kits would upgrade the injectors (probably cheaper than having kit specific FMU recalibrated), but still stuck with the 190lph pump.

My old Cougar made 410hp/456lbs/ft tq at the flywheel with the 190lph pump until in the tank until the guys of this forum scared me into upgrading....but it never fell off at any point on the dyno.

As for the FMU....the only issue I have with using one, is that they can't really be fine tuned for accuracy. You can certainly get them ballpark (Vortech has many options for various injector sizes) but It'll never be as accurate as an ECU. So while you may have one set up to meet the max fuel delivery needs (read: safe levels), it may result in richer delivery in lower demand regions. Not to mention unable to compensate for elevation or temperature. The result....a fatter A/F ratio in order to keep things safe up to peak hp.

Nothing really wrong with that....simply not an "optimal" set up. Still an otherwise proven, low cost and most importantly safe alternative though.
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#13
  • May 7, 2015
  • #13
Thanks for that reply.. I'm gonna run this thing tomorrow night. I hope it stay's together , after reading these post it seems to me that u need tons of fuel. I always thought that their is No placement for displacement. meaning that it still a 306 ci motor. if it was a 502ci I could see all that fuel being used. I guess I'm living on the lean is mean phase.. lol. I'm running a 4:10 gear ratio. 5 spd . I always ran a 26x9 ET street. I'm gonna go with a 28x11.5 to help the top end. I"m hoping to see a super low 12 second et. 118mph . it ran 11:86 on a 150 nitrous shot.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
May 7, 2015
#14
  • May 7, 2015
  • #14
sport200 said:
lean/stoich/rich. It has a s93 computer in it out of a 93 cobra. I live in the Cincinnati area. I don't know if anyone in the area burns chips. ill look in to it thanks a ton.
Click to expand...

The gauge that you have is a narrow band and is more or less worthless, it will not provide you with any appreciable information.

Gearbanger 101 said:
That old ball driver charger would come anywhere close to the need for 42lb/hr injectors, or a 340lph pump.....but they can be installed regarless.

I guess I'm one of the few that doesn't see an issue with the 190lph pump or the 24lb/hr injectors/FMU combination.

The pump itself has show to handle over 570hp N/A.....Even with 6-8psi on tap (which is really pushing it with this blower), so he should be well within safe limits. The Allen guys used to run 6-7psi all day with FMU, stock injectors and a 190lph pump. The 9psi kits would upgrade the injectors (probably cheaper than having kit specific FMU recalibrated), but still stuck with the 190lph pump.

My old Cougar made 410hp/456lbs/ft tq at the flywheel with the 190lph pump until in the tank until the guys of this forum scared me into upgrading....but it never fell off at any point on the dyno.

As for the FMU....the only issue I have with using one, is that they can't really be fine tuned for accuracy. You can certainly get them ballpark (Vortech has many options for various injector sizes) but It'll never be as accurate as an ECU. So while you may have one set up to meet the max fuel delivery needs (read: safe levels), it may result in richer delivery in lower demand regions. Not to mention unable to compensate for elevation or temperature. The result....a fatter A/F ratio in order to keep things safe up to peak hp.

Nothing really wrong with that....simply not an "optimal" set up. Still an otherwise proven, low cost and most importantly safe alternative though.
Click to expand...

You have made some very good points! I don't see the sense in skimping on the fuel system especially with the higher than stock compression. When comparing fuel pumps, typically reduce the advertized N/A capacity to half when talking about forced induction. The same applies to injector sizing while it's not quite that dramatic of a difference. Back in the day, (i hate saying that, i'm not THAT old...) the things we did to bandaid these setups would make some peoples heads spin, extra injectors on a hobbs switch, junk yard this and that to make it work... you name it. While we were able to get by and make things work, the ability to properly tune these cars has replaced every rig that we ever came up with in years past. Point being, have a chip burned for the car and you'll be in the best shape.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
May 7, 2015
#15
  • May 7, 2015
  • #15
sport200 said:
Thanks for that reply.. I'm gonna run this thing tomorrow night. I hope it stay's together , after reading these post it seems to me that u need tons of fuel. I always thought that their is No placement for displacement. meaning that it still a 306 ci motor. if it was a 502ci I could see all that fuel being used. I guess I'm living on the lean is mean phase.. lol. I'm running a 4:10 gear ratio. 5 spd . I always ran a 26x9 ET street. I'm gonna go with a 28x11.5 to help the top end. I"m hoping to see a super low 12 second et. 118mph . it ran 11:86 on a 150 nitrous shot.
Click to expand...
I feel like a broken record when I say this.. Have you tried drag radials? They are more stable and will run faster both ET and MPH when compared to any bias ply tire.
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#16
  • May 7, 2015
  • #16
Nope ET streets is all I ever ran. I've been tossing it around. whats the best to run?
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
May 7, 2015
#17
  • May 7, 2015
  • #17
sport200 said:
Nope ET streets is all I ever ran. I've been tossing it around. whats the best to run?
Click to expand...
26" tire 275-50-15
28" tire 275-60-15
I prefer MickeyThompson personally, tried and true. I don't miss the top end wobble that the bias ply tires had one single bit, we've been using radials for just about 10 years now on everything we build
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#18
  • May 7, 2015
  • #18
Awesome... Is their a certain rubber temp or anything like a regular radial?
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
May 7, 2015
#19
  • May 7, 2015
  • #19
Typically a drag radial does not need much of a burn out, clean the tires off see a little bit of white smoke and you're good to go.
 

sport200

Member
Feb 18, 2008
73
17
18
LAWRENCEBURG, IN
May 7, 2015
#20
  • May 7, 2015
  • #20
wow that would be different. thanks
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
'86 New Turbo Build First Start/Idle Trouble. Full Tune specs attached
  • Heffay
  • Jul 10, 2022
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 12, 2022
Heffay
H
SOLD For Sale 92 Mustang Notchback Complete Rebuild in 2019
  • pearlnotchback
  • Jun 21, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
9
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 24, 2021
Steel1
G
Supercharging Stock Block 1995 Gt
  • gtfiveo
  • Feb 19, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 21, 2017
TOOLOW91
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
Need Help, Car Wont Start, I've Gone Through Both Checklists
  • 93silverlx50
  • Jul 22, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2019
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?