• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

PCV and valve cover breather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paczowski123
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2012
P

paczowski123

Member
Nov 28, 2012
76
2
9
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 14, 2012
#1
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #1
The car I have recently purchased has a valve cover breather on the passenger side cover, but also still has the PCV intact. Or Atleast it seems in tact there is a hose from the upper intake to the lower with a check valve etc. my question is should I be running both of these since my car is NA? I want whatever is best, would it be better to run a hose from the BC to the throttle body? Or is it ok how it is?
 
P

paczowski123

Member
Nov 28, 2012
76
2
9
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 15, 2012
#2
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #2
Anyone, bueler?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Dec 15, 2012
#3
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #3
A PCV system actively scavenges while a breather is passive. On a stock car, a PCV system is better IMHO.
 
P

paczowski123

Member
Nov 28, 2012
76
2
9
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 15, 2012
#4
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #4
Well my sig states the mods. What I want to know is with my mods etc would it be ok to remove the breather and run the full PCV. Meaning I'd run a hose from where the breather was to the plugged metal elbow on my throttle body. I've read running the breather can cause vacuum leaks which is kind of what I'm experiencing with my car. I want to run whatever will be best and let if run as efficiently and good as possible
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Dec 15, 2012
#5
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #5
If you don't have a lot of blowby, the full PCV sounds good. As you noted, it sounds like you just need to add a line from the inlet to a VC.


Your PCV restoration idea sounds fine to me. One has to wonder why the breather was installed in the first place however.

As an aside, you might wanna ensure the breather (mesh screen) is under the PCV valve and grommet.
 
P

paczowski123

Member
Nov 28, 2012
76
2
9
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 15, 2012
#6
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #6
Yes the screen and PCV valve are all there and the valve moves freely. I know eforehand I got the car it was a drag car so it could of had forced induction on it. But who knows maybe they are covering a problem by not letting it functio . I sure hope not though :/ I know when I gt it it has just had new rings and crank bearings installed so I sure hope there's no issues. The motor that was see to race was also not whats in there at the moment, as he showed me the block that came out. But then again people can tell you anything
 

flyinhigh90

Member
Nov 23, 2012
107
1
19
San Bernardino
Dec 15, 2012
#7
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #7
i dont see it nothing wrong with the car having a lil extra breathing room ..u should be ok
 
P

paczowski123

Member
Nov 28, 2012
76
2
9
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 15, 2012
#8
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #8
But I like keeping vehicle systems functioning as they should in most cases. Other than some that can be removed and not cause adverse running conditions. I will hook the PCV up and run it a little while and if it causes problems ill out the breather back on lol
 

Boydster

5 Year Member
Apr 10, 2011
301
20
39
Maryville, Tenn
Dec 15, 2012
#9
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #9
paczowski123 said:
The car I have recently purchased has a valve cover breather on the passenger side cover, but also still has the PCV intact. Or Atleast it seems in tact there is a hose from the upper intake to the lower with a check valve etc. my question is should I be running both of these since my car is NA? I want whatever is best, would it be better to run a hose from the BC to the throttle body? Or is it ok how it is?
Click to expand...

Maybe I'm not reading this right, but isn't what you describe the stock system? A breather hose from the passenger valve cover oil filler to the throttle body, and a vac hose from the upper intake to the rear of the lower intake with the PCV valve in it... isn't this a stock system?
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
204
94
Arkansas
Dec 15, 2012
#10
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #10
Uh... Maybe the PO liked that specific valve cover and decided to run it. Ain't gonna have a gaping hole in your valve cover, are ya?
I've got tall Ford Racing valve covers on mine and a breather in one of them and I'm still using the regular PCV set up from the upper down to the lower.

Also, one second you say that the factory PCV system is intact, and then another you say " I will hook the PCV up and run it a little while" so which is it? Or are you asking which is a better system:
Factory PCV set up VS. valve cover PCV set up? Because both will get the job done.
 
P

paczowski123

Member
Nov 28, 2012
76
2
9
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 15, 2012
#11
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #11
What I meant was removing the valve cover breather and run ing a hose to make the PCV system complete as it was designed from the factory because right now I have the PCV hose from the upper to the lower and then a breather on the pass valve cover. If that will be the best option for running conditions. There will be no gaping hole as the oil filler neck has a port off the side where the breather is, so is just remove the breather off that port Nd run a hose from there to the TB like stock. They are aftermarket polished tall valve covers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved PCV Tube and Valve Cover Breather Hole Locations
  • MDrisc
  • Sep 11, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 22, 2024
MDrisc
M
Engine Crankcase vent tube “relocation”?
  • Mcmahst
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
619
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
A
Engine Genius installed oil filler above rocker arm…
  • afjLX
  • Mar 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
512
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2025
nicholase
H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
503
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
272
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 22, 2026
Blackhawkxx
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?