• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

PCV/Catch can thread - just info

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael Yount
  • Start date Start date Oct 28, 2004

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 28, 2004
#1
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #1
Many of you know I've got catch cans on both my pcv valve vacuum line, and on the throttle body to valve cover line. They've been on the car for probably a year and a half/10k miles. During that time the oil has been changed 3 times. I've never noticed any reduction in oil level on the dipstick between changes.

Today for the first time I drained the catch cans. I got a total of about 6-8 oz. of oil out of it. This is on a car that's driven pretty easily, mild h/c/i/exhaust mods (about 275HP crank). The short block has about 65K miles on it.

I suppose I was surprised that it had trapped that much oil. The good news is that it seems to be pretty effective - I wouldn't have guessed that much oil would've accumulated.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Oct 28, 2004
#2
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #2
I would have expected more oil, but on my old motor.

Do you have any pictures or tips on how you made yours?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Oct 28, 2004
#3
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #3
Jason, awhile back Michael was kind enough to shoot some pics of the setup to me. he did a very nice 'bargain' set up.

Michael, i would surmise the amount of oil you found speaks well for your particular level of blowby and general level of upkeep.
thanks for sharing your findings - i have been meaning to rig something up myself (soup can and fuel filter).
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 29, 2004
#4
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #4
Jason - send me an email at myount@senndelaney.com and ask for catch can pics/details, and I'll respond.
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
Oct 29, 2004
#5
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #5
Whats the reason for doing this other than to catch oil and see how much blowby?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Oct 29, 2004
#6
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #6
Micheal, have you tried different locations to see the effects?

I was told by an old super gasser that the catch cam needs to be higher the valve cover or port you are tapping to prevent it from pulling oil. I was also told to mount it on the firewall.

I treid the front near the rad and it did pull more oil then when I had mine on the rear of the shock tower.

Where are your's located?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 29, 2004
#7
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #7
On mine not so much to see how much blowby - the bottom end on mine is low mileage and pretty solid. It's to keep as much oil out of the intake as possible. Keeps things a bit tidier in there, and makes O2 sensors last longer.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 29, 2004
#8
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #8
Haven't tried different locations Rick. Mine is located higher than the pvc valve on the firewall behind the passenger strut. The tube from the pvc comes straight up, makes a gently 90 degree bend towards the passenger side into a see through fuel filter - acts as a trap to knock out some of the oil, and makes a gentle downhill slope into the side of the catch can about 3/4 of the way up the side. Whatever oil the filter knocks out, it gravity feeds into the can. The vacuum connection to the can comes straight into the top of the can and runs directly to the manifold port.

Similar set up on the throttle body to valve cover nipple. I set the filter in the line from the valve cover nipple to the catch can so that when air is flowing from crankcase to throttle body (wot), I can knock out any oil before it hits the throttle body. But it's clear (no pun) looking at this filter, that there's very little oil moving through that part of the system.

Probably just means I need to spend more time with the throttle open more, and less time seeing how much gas mileage I can get.
 

Thomas302

Member
Jan 9, 2004
119
0
16
Alamogordo, NM
Oct 29, 2004
#9
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #9
What is the point of the tube from the valve cover to the throttle body? I am using motorsport valve covers with no nipple and I just plugged up the nipple on ththrottle body, and its been that way for 2 years no problems. Should I put a tube there? Just wondering. Thanks

Edit: I do have a breathered cap on my valve covers.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Oct 29, 2004
#10
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #10
Thomas302 said:
What is the point of the tube from the valve cover to the throttle body? I am using motorsport valve covers with no nipple and I just plugged up the nipple on ththrottle body, and its been that way for 2 years no problems. Should I put a tube there? Just wondering. Thanks
Click to expand...
I'm sure someone will come behind and give a better, more detailed reason, but I think the gist of it is at Wide Open Throttle, your crank case has a lot of pressure, which is then routed back up and through your valve cover to the throttle body and put back into the system, of course after the MAF, as to not read the same air twice. If you don't have that hose, you could possible run the risk of blowing seals because the pressure has to go somewhere. Some in your situation simply put a filter on top of the valve cover instead of the cap; some negative consquences are that you will most likely have an oil film all over your engine bay from it and you're letting out metered air.

Now I have a question....isn't that what the PCV is for?
 
M

matm347

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2000
2,056
0
0
Oct 29, 2004
#11
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #11
The PCV uses vacuum, since there is no vacuum at WOT, it no longer functions which is where the TB tube comes in. Even though the PCV will still allow gas to vent at WOT, it's main function is part throttle/idle.

I have my PCV capped off and vent the valve covers with a tube under the car...like they did back in the 50s n such.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 29, 2004
#12
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #12
TheUser is close, but not quite there.

Under vacuum conditions, engine vacuum sucks on the crankcase through the pcv valve. It pulls any blowby into the intake manifold. Because you don't want to create a vacuum in the crankcase, there has to be a path to LET METERED AIR INTO the crankcase. That's what the little hose between the throttle body and the valve cover nipple are for. Under high manifold vacuum, metered air travels from the throttle body to the crankcase through the valve cover nipple. Some people who remove the hose and cap off those openings hear squealing sounds under vacuum as air gets pulled into the crankcase past the front or rear seals.

At w.o.t., there is crankcase pressure, and atmospheric pressure in the intake manifold - no vacuum. If the crankcase pressure is greater than the manifold pressure then crankcase venting will occur through the pcv valve/line AND through the valve cover to throttle body line. You can now see that the throttle body to valve cover line is bi-directional. Under some circumstances, air moves from the t/b to the crankcase; under other circumstances air moves from the crankcase through the throttle body. At part load when there is low manifold pressure and low blowby (crankcase pressure) the differential can't overcome the small check valve in the pcv, so venting of the crankcase occurs through the valve cover to throttle body line.

That's what that hose is for. There is absolutely no performance benefit to disconnecting/capping it off - and it may be detrimental. If you have a functioning pcv hooked to manifold vacuum, I'd hook it back up. For breathered valve covers, it's unnecessary.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 29, 2004
#13
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #13
mat - "since there is no vacuum at WOT, it no longer functions"

Not quite right mat - the pcv has a lightweight non-springloaded check in it to prevent backflow. It takes very little pressure differential to open it. So, even at wide open throttle (no vacuum) if crankcase pressure exceeds atmospheric pressure by even a little bit (not uncommon), then the crankcase can vent through BOTH the pcv and the other little hose.
 

GT Trooper

Member
Feb 16, 2004
87
0
7
Redford
Oct 30, 2004
#14
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #14
Michael Yount said:
TheUser is close, but not quite there.

Under vacuum conditions, engine vacuum sucks on the crankcase through the pcv valve. It pulls any blowby into the intake manifold. Because you don't want to create a vacuum in the crankcase, there has to be a path to LET METERED AIR INTO the crankcase. That's what the little hose between the throttle body and the valve cover nipple are for. Under high manifold vacuum, metered air travels from the throttle body to the crankcase through the valve cover nipple. Some people who remove the hose and cap off those openings hear squealing sounds under vacuum as air gets pulled into the crankcase past the front or rear seals.

At w.o.t., there is crankcase pressure, and atmospheric pressure in the intake manifold - no vacuum. If the crankcase pressure is greater than the manifold pressure then crankcase venting will occur through the pcv valve/line AND through the valve cover to throttle body line. You can now see that the throttle body to valve cover line is bi-directional. Under some circumstances, air moves from the t/b to the crankcase; under other circumstances air moves from the crankcase through the throttle body. At part load when there is low manifold pressure and low blowby (crankcase pressure) the differential can't overcome the small check valve in the pcv, so venting of the crankcase occurs through the valve cover to throttle body line.

That's what that hose is for. There is absolutely no performance benefit to disconnecting/capping it off - and it may be detrimental. If you have a functioning pcv hooked to manifold vacuum, I'd hook it back up. For breathered valve covers, it's unnecessary.
Click to expand...

Michael,

Would you recommend a breathered valve cover over the throttle body to valve cover hose for better ventilation? We discussed this the other day in reference to my rear main seal leak.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 30, 2004
#15
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #15
On a naturally aspirated car, if you breather the valve cover with a working pcv set up on an efi car, then under vacuum conditions some unmetered air enters the intake via the breather/crankcase/pcv route. This seems to cause some cars/computers problems, and others don't notice any difference at all (see thomas 302 above).

For that reason I WOULD NOT recommend the breathered valve cover over the t/b connection on a naturally aspirated car - there's no performance benefit, and it could cause drivability issues - you won't know what it's gonna do to yours unless you try it. Besides that, it's tampering with the emissions system, which is illegal, although that doesn't seem to stop it from happening regularly.
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
Oct 30, 2004
#16
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #16
Ok i'm following most of this, but what changes if you have forced induction, like a blower for instance?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 30, 2004
#17
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #17
It gets complex in a hurry if you have boost. Your pcv valve has to be able to withstand the pressure without allowing backflow. The line between the t/b and valve cover has to dealt with as it will allow boost to the crankcase - and that'll blow some oil in a hurry.

Most folks simply say screw it, get a pcv valve off of a factory supercharged or turbocharged car, and put a breather on the valve cover to vent the crankcase when manifold pressure exceeds crankcase pressure. Some folks don't bother with the pcv and just vent the crankcase with breathers. Some route the vent lines to a remote mounted catch can and vent the can. Some vent the can to the suction side of the supercharger - but if you're blowing through the maf, you can accumulate oil on the maf hot wire. Lots to think about when boost arrives..... no pun.
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
Oct 30, 2004
#18
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #18
yea this is all very confusing to me and its something i have to tackle in the spring, so i guess i should start reading up on it more.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Oct 30, 2004
#19
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #19
intrcptrstng said:
yea this is all very confusing to me and its something i have to tackle in the spring, so i guess i should start reading up on it more.
Click to expand...
the turbo stang forums should have more info (not all of us have forced induction).

good luck.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 30, 2004
#20
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #20
To help with the confusion all you have to ask yourself is 'where is the pressure higher and where is it lower'? The flow will go from higher pressure to lower pressure every time. Any time you connect a hose or check valve as a part of all this, just keep that in mind, and you'll work your way through it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
337
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
B
Engine Another no start after washing engine bay
  • bruno
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
486
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
249
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
214
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Engine Gas in my oil
  • limp
  • Jun 15, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 16, 2026
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?