• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

"performance balancers"

  • Thread starter Thread starter allcarfan
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2004

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 1, 2004
#1
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #1
Ok,

im building my new engine. I have a low mileage stock-style balancer/dampner I can use...or I can fork out $180 for an SFI approved balancer/dampner. What the heck is the difference and does it warrant the extra cost?
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jun 1, 2004
#2
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #2
I spoke to a guy at the SEMA convention one year who worked for Albert & Childs, the rod manufacturing guys, and he said they really aren't worth the money. He also indicated that they can cause problems by masking imbalances and creating weird harmonics.

All in all, I think the stockers work just fine, regardless.
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Jun 1, 2004
#3
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #3
I've heard that the fluid balancers can leak, but don't know personally.
I've seen 2 stock balancers come apart at high RPM at the track--not pretty.
Whichever balancer you use, be sure to give it to the machinist doing the balancing of the lower rotating assy, also the flywheel.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jun 1, 2004
#4
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #4
The SFI balancer is certified for a certain RPM not to come apart. Some NHRA classes require this written certification and require proof. It is not a two piece balancer like your stock OEM unit. It will not slip on the rubber isolator or come off during high RPM's. If you are going to run on the track a lot I would spend the extra $$$$.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
432
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
981
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
616
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
A
79 mustang pace car spoiler.
  • Anglosaxon83
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
137
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 21, 2026
Anglosaxon83
A
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
198
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?