• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Performance Products Typhoon...

  • Thread starter Thread starter FineLineMtrsprts
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2007
F

FineLineMtrsprts

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
359
0
16
Inwood, West Virginia
Jul 10, 2007
#1
  • Jul 10, 2007
  • #1
Anyone using the Performance Products Typhoon intake on a 94-95GT. If so let me know what you think. Ive seen it in a test or twoin MM&FF on FoxBody 5.0's and its always done "fairly well" but for the price it seemed hard to beat. If anyone has any input just let me know.

Thanks,

Vince
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jul 11, 2007
#2
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #2
i am currently using a typhoon lower and upper. i haven't dynoed it yet and i may go to a victor efi intake instead if i don't like the torque curve. i don't really care though if it doesn't flow that great above 5000 rpm because i almost never drive in that range anyway. i am building a 100% street car. i want torque from 2500-4500

the upper is the same for both a 351 and a 302
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 11, 2007
#3
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #3
BlackVert said:
i am currently using a typhoon lower and upper. i haven't dynoed it yet and i may go to a victor efi intake instead if i don't like the torque curve. i don't really care though if it doesn't flow that great above 5000 rpm because i almost never drive in that range anyway. i am building a 100% street car. i want torque from 2500-4500

the upper is the same for both a 351 and a 302
Click to expand...


Hehe, ditto here, I am using it on my new engine. I'll find out. Should be more than fine for a 302 though if we are using it on 400+c.i.!

Also, mine is going to be ported but it doesn't have to be.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jul 11, 2007
#4
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #4
Pokageek said:
Hehe, ditto here, I am using it on my new engine. I'll find out. Should be more than fine for a 302 though if we are using it on 400+c.i.!

Also, mine is going to be ported but it doesn't have to be.
Click to expand...

did you send yours to tmoss?
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 11, 2007
#5
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #5
BlackVert said:
did you send yours to tmoss?
Click to expand...

No my engine guy is doing mine. The typhoon always has to be at least port matched because it is a cheaper version of the edelbr and comes out of the box kinda unmatched.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jul 11, 2007
#6
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #6
i noticed my upper <--> lower had been gasget matched when i took my upper off to install the 42#ers. i dunno about the lower <--> heads tho
 
F

FineLineMtrsprts

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
359
0
16
Inwood, West Virginia
Jul 11, 2007
#7
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #7
OK cool thanks guys...its most def. soemthing to consider if this deal works out and i get this 95gt.
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Jul 11, 2007
#8
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #8
i put one on my car with stock heads, cam etc. my bolt ons were cat back and o/r x pipe, cai, pullies, msd box. along with the typoon i added 65mm tb, 24lb injectors and 76mm c&l mass air. i noticed a huge change in power starting about 2000 and the car pulls much harder up to 6000rpm. i got it used on ebay for like 250 bucks.
 
F

FineLineMtrsprts

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
359
0
16
Inwood, West Virginia
Jul 11, 2007
#9
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #9
What year is your car fastgt and how does your ecu handle those mods?
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 11, 2007
#10
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #10
BlackVert said:
i noticed my upper <--> lower had been gasget matched when i took my upper off to install the 42#ers. i dunno about the lower <--> heads tho
Click to expand...

You may want to ask yor builder..he may have port matched it for you. I saw on a car show pulling it out of the box..it was FAR from perfect ALL around BIG time.
 

slvrbullit302

New Member
Jan 6, 2004
986
1
0
Alabama
Jul 12, 2007
#11
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #11
The uppers and lower ports are port matched out of the box, but the lower to head side needs port matching.
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Jul 12, 2007
#12
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #12
FineLineMtrsprts said:
What year is your car fastgt and how does your ecu handle those mods?
Click to expand...

its a 94gt, completely stock engine and heads with 135,000 miles. the car runs great. i did have to play with the idle on the throttle body a little bit to get it to idle right. other than that it runs good. i could use an adjustable fuel pressure regulator on it. the plugs read a little rich.
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Jul 12, 2007
#13
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #13
i put the manifold on out of the box. didnt touch anything.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 12, 2007
#14
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #14
fastgtfairlane said:
i put the manifold on out of the box. didnt touch anything.
Click to expand...


Then you are missing some flow.
 
T

tah94stang

New Member
Nov 21, 2004
5
0
0
Valrico, Florida
Jul 12, 2007
#15
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #15
I have just had my Typhoon Intake installed and I love the difference it made. I had it installed and then dynoed. Has helped with the dragging feeling I always seemed to have with the stock intake. Gave the car more umph.
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Jul 12, 2007
#16
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #16
Pokageek said:
Then you are missing some flow.
Click to expand...

i bought it used. it matched the gaskets pretty well. it may have been massaged by the old owner.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jul 12, 2007
#17
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #17
fastgtfairlane said:
i put the manifold on out of the box. didnt touch anything.
Click to expand...

"out of the box" made it sound (to me at least) like you had bought it new. sounds like it sounded that way to keith too
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 13, 2007
#18
  • Jul 13, 2007
  • #18
fastgtfairlane said:
i bought it used. it matched the gaskets pretty well. it may have been massaged by the old owner.
Click to expand...


Yep, the old owner cleaned it up.
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Jul 13, 2007
#19
  • Jul 13, 2007
  • #19
he probably did. ive been pretty satisfied with that manifold setup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
957
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
1
Electrical 1985 mustang gt Led conversion trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Jan 5, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
640
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2026
1985fox
1
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
842
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?