• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

PI Intake mod info

  • Thread starter Thread starter mijo_latino
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2006
M

mijo_latino

Active Member
Apr 16, 2004
179
1
29
Canton, Michigan
Dec 18, 2006
#1
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #1
I thought this might be useful to clear up some of the fuzziness surrounding the PI vs non-pi gaskets when doing the PI intake mod.

non-pi---->http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=495410

As you can see, you really have to gob up all along the sides of the gaskets to get a seal. The good thing going this route, is that if you do get a leak, it will only be an intake leak. Meaning your car will throw a code(both banks lean). The bad is that its risker that you won't get a seal(didn't wait the 24 hour curing time, or missed a spot) and have to tear everything apart and start over. I really don't think that you can go this route with forced induction as the seal would give.

Also, My seal with this method lasted almost exaclty 2 years. It finally gave way and now im here.




PI----/\----

With the PI gaskets, all areas seal up fine except 2 spots, one on each side of the manifold.. That is the coolent passage in the bottom two pics.
The good is that you only have to seal about an inch of the gasket, and you will not have any intake leak problems. The bad is that if the seal fails, you will leak coolent onto the block and will have to fix it right away. You will definetly notice this as you will get coolent odor and steam like you blew a hose. I think this method would easily hold up to forced induction as there is a solid seal on the intake side of things.

This time round I went with the PI gaskets as I see less likely to fail. I want to add that some people see that if the coolent seal fails, it will some how go into the intake port next to it. I hope this pic clarifies that there is a full seal around that port(your not trying to seal with RTV) and extremely unlikely that will happen because of this route.

Hopefully you got a little better understanding on why there is a choice on which gaskets to go with. Either will work, you make the call.





p.s. if any info is wrong or misleading, go ahead and correct me as I'm dead inside
 

Attachments

  • helpfulpic.webp
    62.2 KB · Views: 955

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Dec 18, 2006
#2
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #2
Well, it's been a few years since my PI intake install and had gone, as you did initially, with the NPI gasket for fear of the coolant leak for the most part. No issues for me so far, but appreciate you sharing the info. If I have to take the intake off for any reason, I will be putting the PI gaskets back on. Good job.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Dec 19, 2006
#3
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #3
The PI Gasket method is much easier to do.
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Dec 19, 2006
#4
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #4
DropTopPony said:
The PI Gasket method is much easier to do.
Click to expand...
I used the PI intake gasket method and everything turned
out just fine.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Dec 19, 2006
#5
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #5
Excellent post...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
170
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
607
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
615
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
298
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 22, 2026
Blackhawkxx
2001 Mustang GT -- Valve Assembly Pressure Regulator Solution Found!
  • SN95_fanx54
  • Aug 17, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?