• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Pi intake swap numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98bluevert
  • Start date Start date May 20, 2007

98bluevert

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
130
0
0
Mattoon, IL
May 20, 2007
#1
  • May 20, 2007
  • #1
Ok i was wounder what the swap numbers are under the curve for a npi intake to a pi intake. i know its like 17 peak rwhp. but does anyone have a dyno graph or just numbers all the way through the curve for the difference?

Also what about those adapter plates i have read about. peak to peak its only a couple of ponies but again what about under the curve? Does the mismatch mess anything up through the powerband?
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
May 20, 2007
#2
  • May 20, 2007
  • #2
I don't have my graph loaded but from all indications it helps from the mid to top range of the curve. I installed mine with some homemade adapter plates a guy designed so the professional plates would be a tick better I guess.

The real result was the 3 tenths and 4 MPH I gained at the track with the PI intake.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
May 21, 2007
#3
  • May 21, 2007
  • #3
Actually the gain was 17 RWHP, 31 RWHP at the peak difference.
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
May 22, 2007
#4
  • May 22, 2007
  • #4
This is a comparison chart of the pre and post PI intake swap on my stang and also the addition of an FRPP catback. Red color is the NPI intake and the blue is with the PI intake. You can see it definately changed the torque curve considerably (peak is down, but makes more in the upper ranges) and allowed engine to keep making hp over 4.2k rpm all the way to 5k rpm.

Note that I don't have the adapter plates or tune as of yet. I probably won't go back in and put the plates on, but will be getting a tune eventually.


 

Dusstbuster

I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec
May 31, 2004
1,462
33
64
Moorhead, Minnesota
May 22, 2007
#5
  • May 22, 2007
  • #5
LI98GTStang said:
This is a comparison chart of the pre and post PI intake swap on my stang and also the addition of an FRPP catback. Red color is the NPI intake and the blue is with the PI intake. You can see it definately changed the torque curve considerably (peak is down, but makes more in the upper ranges) and allowed engine to keep making hp over 4.2k rpm all the way to 5k rpm.

Note that I don't have the adapter plates or tune as of yet. I probably won't go back in and put the plates on, but will be getting a tune eventually.


Click to expand...



How...just...how....??!?!?!?


I hate my car, and you...
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
May 22, 2007
#6
  • May 22, 2007
  • #6
Dusstbuster said:
How...just...how....??!?!?!?


I hate my car, and you...
Click to expand...


We do have very similiar mods . My guess, that the difference can be explained by being that they were measured on different dynos, pulleys, 5sp vs. Auto and a little more agressive stock chip on my '98. Do you have 1/4 mile times? Either way, the PI intake is well worth the time and money.
 

Dusstbuster

I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec
May 31, 2004
1,462
33
64
Moorhead, Minnesota
May 22, 2007
#7
  • May 22, 2007
  • #7
LI98GTStang said:
We do have very similiar mods . My guess, that the difference can be explained by being that they were measured on different dynos, pulleys, 5sp vs. Auto and a little more agressive stock chip on my '98. Do you have 1/4 mile times? Either way, the PI intake is well worth the time and money.
Click to expand...

Mine was on a Dynojet chassis dynamometer model 248c tuned by Andy at Dynotuneusa.com. The biggest difference I see is the 5spd vs auto and I guess pulleys, otherwise my car is chipped so the tune shouldn't matter I wouldn't think. Either way yes, PI swap stuff is WELL worth it.

No 1/4 mile times yet, I have never been to the track but will be this summer, so my times will suck more than likely
 

98bluevert

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
130
0
0
Mattoon, IL
May 22, 2007
#8
  • May 22, 2007
  • #8
i know its worth it (so are the cams)but do the adapter plates make a difference under the curve. smooth anything out maybe more power under the curve because of it, or are they just a waste of money. so should i just use PI gaskets and rtv around the coolant passage.
 

Dusstbuster

I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec
May 31, 2004
1,462
33
64
Moorhead, Minnesota
May 22, 2007
#9
  • May 22, 2007
  • #9
I'd say they probably aren't worth the $100 most places charge for them. If you can find some for fairly cheap then get them, otherwise I think they're too expensive for minimal gains.
 

screamin gt

5 Year Member
Apr 9, 2007
393
6
28
central CT
May 23, 2007
#10
  • May 23, 2007
  • #10
I've got one on ebay for $10 right now. took off my 99

if you use it on a 96-98 don't you need to swap the heads too? or is that the adapter plates your talking about?
 

Dusstbuster

I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec
May 31, 2004
1,462
33
64
Moorhead, Minnesota
May 23, 2007
#11
  • May 23, 2007
  • #11
screamin gt said:
I've got one on ebay for $10 right now. took off my 99

if you use it on a 96-98 don't you need to swap the heads too? or is that the adapter plates your talking about?
Click to expand...

No, you don't need PI heads nor do you really need adapter plates. The adapter plates allow a smoother flow of air but you still see significant gains over NPI cams/manifold/head vs PI manifold/cams & NPI heads.

The big reason full PI swaps net 10-20 more HP than just PI Cams/Manifold is the bump in compression. It flows slightly better, but nothing overly spectacular. The one nice thing about PI heads is the wider variety of more aggressive cams you can choose from though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
542
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
603
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
S
KNOCK WITH CLUTCH OUT
  • Scwhitten
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
234
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
C
5r55s auto to TR3650 Manual swap 4.0 V6
  • Ceskz
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Mar 27, 2025
89ripper
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
402
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?