• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Piston in the Hole WAY to Much?!?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hickfied
  • Start date Start date Nov 22, 2006

Hickfied

Member
Nov 9, 2005
413
0
16
Morganton, NC
Nov 22, 2006
#1
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #1
I just stripped this 357 down, and found this!



Is that not in the hole way too much? I can't find my feeler gauges... But the engine ran fine for 9.5k mikes, with a stock type head gasket.

I just bought some .039 ROL head gaskets... And I do not want to ping!
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Nov 22, 2006
#2
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #2
they arent going to come completely to the top of the deck... I know stock 5.0's dont. and if you think its sitting low then that would mean the compression is lower and wont ping as easily.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Nov 22, 2006
#3
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #3
that doesn't seem to low to me. I would be worried about all that carbon. Looks like you are running 2 rich. What kinda timing are you running and what fuel are you using?
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Nov 22, 2006
#4
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #4
onefstsnake said:
they arent going to come completely to the top of the deck... I know stock 5.0's dont. and if you think its sitting low then that would mean the compression is lower and wont ping as easily.
Click to expand...


WRONG...its not the compression that makes it ping....its when the timing is way off, or there is something causing a spike in pressure. And, the more your piston is in the hole, the MORE likely of ping because it's not at zero deck height. The corners of the cylinder bore cause pressure spikes creating detonation. This is why when you build a motor, you want to be at zero deck, and to lower compression we have step dish pistons.

If this is a mild-power engine, i wouldn't worry about if it was running fine. How much in the hole is it?
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 22, 2006
#5
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #5
looks fine to me. And there is going to be a certain amount of carbon
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Nov 22, 2006
#6
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #6
Modular2v said:
looks fine to me. And there is going to be a certain amount of carbon
Click to expand...
maybe i'm just used to looking at my engine. My pistons are very clean. I bet it is the nitrous that keeps em looking that way.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 22, 2006
#7
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #7
86bluecobra said:
maybe i'm just used to looking at my engine. My pistons are very clean. I bet it is the nitrous that keeps em looking that way.
Click to expand...
mine were very clean too......must be the sauce
 

Hickfied

Member
Nov 9, 2005
413
0
16
Morganton, NC
Nov 22, 2006
#8
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #8
I bought the engine off my ex g/f's dad. He ran a 750 carb on a stock 69 357 w/ a mild cam. I guess he was always running way to rich lol. I was hoping to be spraying atleast a 200shot with 4340 internals. I am gonna hve to find my feeler gauges... Because I just bought a .039 head gasket... That leaves me with .011 to be in the hole... Eh... Not looking good for me.
 

302RollinHard

New Member
Sep 26, 2005
0
0
0
Columbus, OH
Nov 22, 2006
#9
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #9
My 357 is .020" in the hole, which is within spec. optimal, no, but will it really hurt things? I don't really think so. Look at it this way....lets you have just a touch more piston to valve clearance....
 

Hickfied

Member
Nov 9, 2005
413
0
16
Morganton, NC
Nov 22, 2006
#10
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #10
I just don't want to fubar my quench when i'm spraying a 200 shot.
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Nov 22, 2006
#11
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #11
oh god nitrous and that much quench? lol To be honest .011 is not THAT bad for NA, but i have no idea with a 200 shot! as rick91gt
i didnt even see you were using nitrous, that thing will ping like a SOB when you get on it.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Nov 23, 2006
#12
  • Nov 23, 2006
  • #12
STOP guessing.. go and borrow a mic and check it out!! you will NEVER know your compression with out knowing the Deck!! 200 shot will rock!! .010 and .015 used to be pretty common!! .020 is also do able!! but MIC the suckers!! and then you'll know!! and it is always good to mic BOTH sides of the engine!! we have seen blocks as much as .030 differance between the sides!! Just a thought!!

Just me...........................

Thumper
 

Hickfied

Member
Nov 9, 2005
413
0
16
Morganton, NC
Nov 23, 2006
#13
  • Nov 23, 2006
  • #13
Yea, I was planning on micing it once I get it cleaned up, and the stores open back up

I have to tear this thing down to be decked... Imma just go 408
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Nov 23, 2006
#14
  • Nov 23, 2006
  • #14
well building a 408 would be nice.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 24, 2006
#15
  • Nov 24, 2006
  • #15
onefstsnake said:
they arent going to come completely to the top of the deck... I know stock 5.0's dont.
Click to expand...

my stock short block had zero deck through negative .009" deck (out of the hole).............
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Nov 24, 2006
#16
  • Nov 24, 2006
  • #16
The way to deck the block is with the four pistons in the 4 holes they belong in.. then mic the deck of each piston... then remove the amout of deck so each piston is equal in the bores and the deck is also equal!! Having the block "Squared " is another way, and will get real close.. the best way for any engine is with the 4 cornors in the block!! Then you "Have .005 in or -009 out..

Just me...............................

Thumper
 

mstngjoe

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
428
0
0
Oregon
Nov 24, 2006
#17
  • Nov 24, 2006
  • #17
My shop uses a BHJ Block-Tru to ensure the decks are perfectly flat front to back and square with the crankshaft centerline.

And relative to what TMoss said about his piston being out of the hole....I just pulled down a bone stock '89 5.0 that had the pistons .006 above the deck. Unfortunately, I didn't measure the head gasket before I tossed it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
809
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
399
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
S
  • Locked
Drivetrain Adjustable clutch cable questions
  • Scott_S
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
425
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
T
Convertible A-pillar weatherstrip issues
  • thiefofcheese
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
348
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?