• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

piston question ( pics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter OinkAodeOink
  • Start date Start date Mar 19, 2004

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Mar 19, 2004
#1
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #1
In the process of test fitting the rods, pistons, and i believe i ran into a problem.
Piston comes out of the bore by .050's at TDC.
All parts are Brand New, and have not been worked on, except for the block, which was not cut. Scat 347 stroker kit, with the 5.4" rod lenght, stroker crank, clevitte77 bearings, Speedpro Moly rings, and Ross forged dished(20cc) pistons. After matching up an old Felpro, which was .039 or so, the piston still comes out farther the the gasket. The heads dont have any sort of recessed cutout for the pistons.

Does this look like a problem, or do i just need a thick gasket.
By the way, i plan on having the heads o-ringed, if that makes a diference here. Do i need to have the piston shaved down, or the heads cut out for clearence?




 

5.0fox

Member
Feb 10, 2003
410
0
17
buckley/enumclaw wa
Mar 19, 2004
#2
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #2
its allright if it sticks out a little bit if you have enough valve to piston clearance
 
3

331 cobra

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
398
0
0
Silicon Valley CA
Mar 19, 2004
#3
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #3
That's very bad.

I think you want about .035" piston to head clearance minimum. .045" would be much more safe.

When the engine heats up, the rods and pistons expand, and the force created by decelerating the piston streches the rod also. These factors will reduce that .035" clearance to about zero at high rpm.

You will be starting out with negative clearance at room tempature, zero rpm.

You need to disasemble it and measure all of the relevant dimensions: piston compression height, rod length, stroke and deck height.

Unless you got a bad part, I think the most likely cause would be the block. Was it ever decked or line honed? Both of those things can change the deck height.
 
2

2stangs69-91

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2000
78
0
0
Redding CA. USA
Mar 19, 2004
#4
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #4
If it sticks up .050 you won't be able to turn the engine over much less worry about the valve clearence is the .050 acurate or a guess? anyhow call the place you got your kit and talk to them about it something is wrong. I have had domes milled off of pistons before but never the entire top.
 
9

90stangLX302

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
76
0
0
Good ol' Bellaire Ohio
Mar 19, 2004
#5
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #5
make sure you tightened the bottom of the connecting rods up when you are checking it all out, mine were almost the same then i noticed i didnt even tighten the nuts so it was sticking up to far,... just a stupid mistake i got all worried about that i thought i would warn you about
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Mar 19, 2004
#6
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #6
.050 is no good!!! your done!! something must be wrong... the block decked?? .045-.050?? doubtful !! the combo is wrong...?? More than likely!! You can have .005 out... but .050 wont work!! Have the BLOCK O-Ringed ..not the heads!! It will save you a lot of money in the long run... a lot!!

331Cobra is right on you need at least .035 top of piston to the head!! .045 is better, if the engine is going to see 6k or better!! IF you go to Copper gaskets, you can get up to .080 thick !! and that would give you the .030 you need!! but the block should be O-ringed for copper gaskets!! If not going with the .080 gasket...... I'd call the shop and see why!!!!! fixing the problem isnt the problem..... and if the piston IS out .050.. what else is wrong???

Just me..........................

Thumper
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Mar 19, 2004
#7
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #7
well heres the deal... When i ordered the Stroker kit from Scat, i told them what i wanted specifically.. a 331(327 ci), standard bore, Forged crank/rods, and low compression pistons that would bring me to 8.58.8:1 compression.. I few weeks latter, the parts arrived after being balanced to 28oz. I get the box and see its a 347 kit, not a 331.... Atleast i think it is... And i measured the piston with a feeler guage, and it might not be .050, but its damn close ( +- .001) Here are some specs, from the invoice..

Balanced Scat 302 Ford crankshaft
Standard style, 4340 forged
3.400 stroke X 2.123/1.680 PIN
5.400 Rod Lenght, Nitrided

Scat 302 Ford H beam Rod set
5.400 Rod lenght /.927 wrist pin, bushed
2.123 Pin Diameter/ .830 Big end Width

Ford Windsor 302 Ross Piston 4.001 Bore X3.250 Stroke
5.400 Rod Lenght 1.160 CH .927 Pin Diameter


Shoot- Just realized my own problem, i think... Rod/crank are 3.400 stroke ( 347) and the pistons are 3.250 Stroke ( 331)... idiots!!!
 
3

331 cobra

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
398
0
0
Silicon Valley CA
Mar 19, 2004
#8
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #8
Yeah, they are idiots.

You need to either get a new set of 5.315" rods, and rebalence the crank with the new bob weight, get a new crank and ballence that, or get a new set of pistons and reballence the crank.

All of those options suck and I hope you don't get bit by it.

It always pays to check everything before you start assembeling and ballencing.
 
N

nitroponynj

New Member
Mar 1, 2004
27
0
0
Mar 19, 2004
#9
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #9
yu have the worng crank............
 

nitrousED

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
88
0
0
Mar 20, 2004
#10
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #10
if im not mistaken the srank should be 3.25 and rods 3.40
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Motor given to me and I’d like to rebuild it what do I need to do
  • Creomod
  • Dec 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
404
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2024
AeroCoupe
M
4.6 2v ready to go in.
  • Michael007
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2024
Mustang5L5
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
What in gods green earth happend to my N/A 2.3?
  • Piranahbite
  • Mar 24, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 1, 2024
Piranahbite
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?