• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Please Post dyno Results with SLP Loudmouth

  • Thread starter Thread starter wms004
  • Start date Start date Feb 25, 2004

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Feb 25, 2004
#1
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #1
Would like to know what kind of numbers are getting put down with the catback. I know catbacks don't make that much of a difference but would like to see the whole RPM band. I'm starting to dig the sound clips

-wade
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Feb 25, 2004
#2
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #2

bump
 

stallion98gt

New Member
May 12, 2003
1,802
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 25, 2004
#3
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #3
lol...MM&FF did an install on a S/C stang..swapping the stock catback for the loudmouth and they got +11rhwp +9tq !!!!....
stang already has a BBK xpipe before dyno. that's the only numbers I Have...
the full SLP exhaust is supposed to get u +34rwhp on a stock stang according to SLP website..do the maths on a SC stang ..GO SLP !!!!..lol
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Feb 25, 2004
#4
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #4
N/A i was just wondering if was worth it. I feel like my car is choked by my catback but i have absolutly no comparison. I'll probably end up getting an accufab 75mm to match my plenum before the catback. Just gotta find the best price still.
 
B

BlkDragon

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
162
0
0
St. Louis
Feb 26, 2004
#5
  • Feb 26, 2004
  • #5
No dyno results. But, I have a feeling that there will not be much of an increase. If one wants increased power get LT's or a hi-flow catted x.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Feb 26, 2004
#6
  • Feb 26, 2004
  • #6
BlkDragon said:
No dyno results. But, I have a feeling that there will not be much of an increase. If one wants increased power get LT's or a hi-flow catted x.
Click to expand...
i've got a catted X.. wondering if the catback will compliment it more
 

Mr Plow

Member
Jul 13, 2003
148
0
16
Suffolk, Long Island
Mar 13, 2004
#7
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #7
This was my dyno run with the slp catback, pullies, c&l plenum and k&n filter
 

Attachments

  • DSC00907.webp
    36.8 KB · Views: 261

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Mar 13, 2004
#8
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #8
you will gain hp by adding the SLP cat-back to your x-pipe. i think the average is around 5rwhp.
 
0

01'TRUE BLUE GT

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
4,984
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA.
Mar 14, 2004
#9
  • Mar 14, 2004
  • #9
wms004 said:
i've got a catted X.. wondering if the catback will compliment it more
Click to expand...

Finally tired of those Flows, huh? I told you before to try a pair of the Spin Techs. Either get the Sportsmans (I love mine) or the Pro Streets if you want it even louder. Did I steer you wrong the last time?
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Mar 14, 2004
#10
  • Mar 14, 2004
  • #10
Mr Plow said:
This was my dyno run with the slp catback, pullies, c&l plenum and k&n filter
Click to expand...

That's STD number though. So it's higher than the standard SAE
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Mar 14, 2004
#11
  • Mar 14, 2004
  • #11
01'TRUE BLUE GT said:
Finally tired of those Flows, huh? I told you before to try a pair of the Spin Techs. Either get the Sportsmans (I love mine) or the Pro Streets if you want it even louder. Did I steer you wrong the last time?
Click to expand...
just playin my options.. After Adding my plenum and 75mm throttle body i'm actually pretty happy with how the car is responding, don't have that choked feel that i was blaming on the flows when it really wasn't.. I'm a little low on dough, so i'll stick with the flows for a while unless they rust or something, heh. I'd like to hear a clip of your setup tho just for kicks.

-wade
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Help with 1986 GT 5 Speed Please
  • Lcasada1999
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
232
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
360
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Y
Cams in Ca?
  • yelol2v
  • May 12, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
631
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 1, 2024
2vVert
2
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
543
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 2:38 PM
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?