• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Plenum Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter madmatt
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
S

spikeGT_99

New Member
May 3, 2004
184
0
0
Jackson, Ms
Jul 31, 2004
#21
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #21
dragon and trickflow are the worst performing plenums according to what ive seen, the only thing they got going for them is the price, as soon as i got the cash im gonna grab me an accufab, best performance and the best looking IMO
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
Jul 31, 2004
#22
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #22
I have heard that plenum and TB is a waste of $$$$$ for a NA mustang. Too much $$$ for very little performance gain.
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jul 31, 2004
#23
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #23
I did the work on this stuff a while back. You can read all about it here:

http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=30

and here:

http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=38

The HP per dollar ratio isn't that great, but it makes a good foundation for other mods.

Matt
 

hotrodredneck

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
200
0
0
Newport News Va
Jul 31, 2004
#24
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #24
I've got the Trick flow/BBK 70MM set up and I could feel a good difference when i hooked them up...Some guys in my club run the C&L but most say they should have held out for the Accufab...I am quite happy with the trickflow.
 

4.6_02_Black_GT

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
622
1
0
Charlotte NC
Jul 31, 2004
#25
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #25
Accufab TB and Plenum look the best..the polished vs unpolished.

But I went with Accufab 75mm TB but..choose the C&L upper plenum. Not as prettty but I believe its the a little better. See sig for pics
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Jul 31, 2004
#26
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #26
03trubluGT said:
The HP per dollar ratio isn't that great, but it makes a good foundation for other mods.
Click to expand...

Matt is so right. Nothing on the mod motor is cheap and free horses are few and far in between. Adding a plenum and TB helps, but it won't be like nitrous-if that's what some of you think?!?! But above 3K, it definately pulls better...much better.
It's been said a million times, but I'll repeat, an engine is more or less an air pump. There are a bunch of variables to that, but the more you can get in and out of the engine efficiently, the more power that can be made. Again, this is a general statement. That doesn't mean a 8 inch diameter intake pipe and 2 inch primary headers will work for your motor.
And most aftermarket MAFs still suck...
 
S

slangstang

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
5
0
0
Jul 31, 2004
#27
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #27
My .02

I installed the 75mm Accufab plenum & T/B about 2 weeks ago. Install was easy and I'm no mechanic. First mod on my 03 gt. I chose it as my first mod because it looked easy and I thought I would feel some gains from it. Had some vacuum leak issues initially ( weird idle problems but no stalling) so sealed everything with high temp RTV. Idle problems gone, then few days driving and WOW!. Definit SOP difference. Pulls much more cleanly in upper RPM's. Feels like 10hp though probably not. Specially notice what seems like wider power curve in 1st and 2nd. Gains especially noticable with AC off. Sounds better too. Very happy with this first mod. Gears next though not going to do those myself
 
S

sacstoy02gt

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
124
0
0
Waukesha, WI
Aug 1, 2004
#28
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #28
I went with the C&L Plenum and Accufab 75mm TB. Nice SOTP increase(no dyno #s). Both pieces are very high quality. Well worth it, and a bit cheaper than the All Accufab setup.

Obligatory Pic:

 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Aug 1, 2004
#29
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #29
The Accufab tb and plenum are high quality pieces that always dyno a little higher than the competition. It is true that the 70 mm dynoed a little higher than the 75 mm but that was on an otherwise stock Mustang. Start adding performance parts and you'll be glad that you went with the 75 mm.

I would not recommend the Dragon plenum. I bought one and returned it because of a whistling sound around 2000 rpms.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
434
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
314
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
619
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?