• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

porting heads while bolted on?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94v6GT
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2007
9

94v6GT

New Member
May 13, 2006
141
0
0
Oct 1, 2007
#1
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #1
anyone ever port the intake side of the heads with them still attached? im thinking about doing it during an intake swap? since the ports would be easily accesible during the swap.
-Pros? Cons? even possible?
 

Zero_chance

Founding Member
May 29, 2001
1,243
7
59
Maricopa, AZ
Oct 1, 2007
#2
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #2
Id have to say it wouldnt be recommended due to the fact that youre bound to get metal chips in the engine that way. Me personally, if I had the intake off already, Id just go ahead and remove the heads. Youre 80% there anyways, might as well go all the way ya know? On my other car I started with the intake off to replace the leaking seals and the next thing I know it was down to the bare block... If youre going to do things, you might as well do them right the first time.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 1, 2007
#3
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #3
I would say a big NO

Your bound to get shavings all in the cylinder, thru an open valve.

You could port the intake, but are you forgetting the restrictive exhaust ports?

It could technically be done, but you would have to take very precaution. Plug all ports/holes/lifter valley, and insure not to get any shavings into the runners.

Not worth it at all in my opinion. It's a dangerous gamble for a minimum result.

Stick with the intake swap
 

sleeperstang199

New Member
Jun 21, 2007
78
0
0
harrisburg, Pa
Oct 1, 2007
#4
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #4
agreed. you will most likely get metal in the cylinders no matter how careful you are. i also agree that if your doing the intake just get a head gasket kit and pull the heads. then you can really do a good job and port and polish both the intake and exhaust.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 1, 2007
#5
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #5
Besides all the reasons above

Work in the bowl is where its at with the iron Ford heads

So that would be another ... NO

Now ... Lets get away from all that Negative ... NO ... Stuff

You are not thinking like the masses
and
You are also thinking outside of the box

Thats the kind of Positive thinking that will take you far :Word:

Grady
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Oct 2, 2007
#6
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #6
94v6GT said:
anyone ever port the intake side of the heads with them still attached? im thinking about doing it during an intake swap? since the ports would be easily accesible during the swap.
-Pros? Cons? even possible?
Click to expand...

I ported my own intake manifold and stock heads, and I can tell you there's no way you can port the heads while they're still attached to the block without debris getting into the cylinders. Remove the heads to do the job properly.
Porting the intake alone (mainly the no.1 and no.5 runners) won't do much; it's the heads that really need work especially on the exhaust side. The intake side merely needs pocket porting and bowl blending, and you can grind a little off the pushrod bosses (be careful not to remove too much). The exhaust side's where you'll see the greatest airflow gains. The same pocket porting and bowl blending applies on the exhaust side but in addition, you'll need to grind away the thermactor bosses.
You'll find these articles every useful:

http://www.diyporting.com/intake_manifold.html
http://www.diyporting.com/E7OV.html
http://www.diyporting.com/E7p2.html
http://www.diyporting.com/E7p3.html
http://www.diyporting.com/E7P4.html
http://www.diyporting.com/E7breakthro.html

Some people might say it's a waste of time porting the stock intake and heads but I disagree. You can gain an easy 20-25hp and as long as you don't go wild, you can also gain 20-25lbft of torque right across the rpm range (yes, even at low revs). No other head/intake combo can match the ported stock items for torque below 4000rpm so if that's where you like to have your cake, swing your Dremel into action so you can eat it.
 
S

Sirone

New Member
Nov 12, 2006
63
0
0
Oct 2, 2007
#7
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #7
All i can say is that would be a half ass job.
 
9

94v6GT

New Member
May 13, 2006
141
0
0
Oct 2, 2007
#8
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #8
thanks for all the input. i wanted to run that by everyone real quick. i was jus thinking a may be a quick/easy way to pick up some horses. but you guys are right, the possible performance gain doesnt out weigh the risk of potential damage.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Oct 2, 2007
#9
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #9
94v6GT said:
thanks for all the input. i wanted to run that by everyone real quick. i was jus thinking a may be a quick/easy way to pick up some horses. but you guys are right, the possible performance gain doesnt out weigh the risk of potential damage.
Click to expand...

If you remove the heads and intake as I did and port them properly, the performance gain IS worth the effort. I was delighted with the results after 10 hours spent porting my intake (2 hours) and heads (8 hours). That came to roughly 2hp per hour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
1991 GT cigarette lighter/port not working (horn is working)
  • MartinM
  • Aug 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
183
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
MartinM
M
X
Engine 5.0 Head Gaskets installed wrong block coolant passages???
  • Xam Sirrah
  • Jul 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
583
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 22, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
513
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
828
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?