• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Porting TW heads worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CManT1914
  • Start date Start date Jun 27, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
T

TMC

Founding Member
Jan 17, 1999
1,426
0
36
Chicago
Jun 28, 2005
#21
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #21
You can change the cam without pulling the heads.

Porting the heads is expensive so why go through that, plus the wait to get them done, rather than using what you have now. So maybe the numbers are not as high as you would like them to be??? If you really are looking to make those numbers happen then it would cost less to sell the TFS cam and pick up a different one and some valve springs. The right cam could be worth 20+/-hp over the TFS cam even with unported heads. You could deal with the intake and exhaust for now and change that as money permits.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 28, 2005
#22
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #22
Chris

You've gotten a lot of good advice from peeps who, IMHO know what their talkin about.

Lower your expectations just a tad and use some of the parts you've got and you'll have a lot of fun...Just wait and see.

You can always step things up a bit when money allows.

290rwhp give or take a little doesn't suck, lol..........................
especially if you got a little power under the curve.

Later
Grady
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 28, 2005
#23
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #23
CManT1914 said:
Ooh!! I found some info on Grn92LX's car. He said he put down 303hp and 339tq with box-stock stuff, and ran a 12.88 @ 107 (on DR's but still). Hope is rekindled! I really only wanted to run some 12's, and I figured I would need 300+ at the wheels to do so (especially since I weigh in near 3600 lbs).

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=470060&highlight=trickflow+dyno
Click to expand...

That I did

Now, put 1 5/8" longtubes on, 75mm tb and install the tfs 1 cam on a 108* centerline and see what happens. Use an rpm manifold instead of the street heat. I ended up swapping the tfs 1 for an fti cam and to be honest I wish I never made that swap. 93hatch on corral made 315rwhp with ported old school edelbrocks, rpm manifold and a tfs 1 cam on a 108* centerline as recommended by buddy rawls. Doesn't matter now, i'm building this now:
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jun 28, 2005
#24
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #24
Grn92LX said:
That I did

Now, put 1 5/8" longtubes on, 75mm tb and install the tfs 1 cam on a 108* centerline and see what happens. Use an rpm manifold instead of the street heat. I ended up swapping the tfs 1 for an fti cam and to be honest I wish I never made that swap. 93hatch on corral made 315rwhp with ported old school edelbrocks, rpm manifold and a tfs 1 cam on a 108* centerline as recommended by buddy rawls. Doesn't matter now, i'm building this now:
Click to expand...

Why do you wish you hadn't swapped to an FTI cam? From the very beginning all I really was expecting was a good 300 (okay okay, I was wanting a little more) to the wheels. I figured if the TFS package boasted 350 flywheel, given the obligiatory 15% drivetrain loss, that would come in at JUST under 300 (like 298 or so). So I figured with my full exhaust, the few bolt-ons I have, and my fuel system (still waiting on a fuel pump) I could see at least 300. Now I know that while it is possible, I won't get my hopes up in case I don't see it. Is that pic of your 347? I was looking at it for a minute thinking, "what's wrong with that motor? the top half of the block is gone!" Then I realized it was upside down, and that the "top half" was actually where the oil pan sits. lol Looking good!
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jun 28, 2005
#25
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #25
CManT1914 said:
280? I really don't see my parts as only putting out 280rwhp. With the port job on the Cobra, it should (I say SHOULD, because looking at the out-of-the-box flow ratings, the 95 Cobra isn't much below the Eddy at all, and the Eddy is a real good intake) flow pretty good. I know it helped out a BUNCH on my setup now, and it helps it pull a LOT harder up top. I know the cam doesn't have insane lift either, but come on, with some 1.7's (although I'm only putting those on the intakes for now, I might buy a full set of 1.7's later on) it will still have some good flow.



Yea! As far as I know, TFS still advertises that with these heads, Stage 1 cam, and their intake (which we all know isn't the greatest) you're supposed to be putting out 350 or so at the flywheel. Now I'm a little skeptical of that, I mean to go from 215 to 350 with just H/C/I? But I don't see how I couldn't be pushing that with my other mods (TB, MAF, Powerpipe, fuel system). Maybe I'm just grasping at false hope, lol. What about without the port job? I meant to bring my heads with me today so I could run by the machine shop on my lunch break, but I need a haircut more than I need a port job, lol.



224/238??!! I should be pushing that already! lol. This isn't very encouraging guys!! I just wanted a good 325 to the wheels, I asked, people suggested the Stage 1 cam, the TW heads are supposed to flow nearly as much as the 185's, and now I'm hearing I might not even break 300!! GAH!!!

Okay I'm better now.
Click to expand...

obviously that was 324/338

with that cam, you might not brake 300.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jun 28, 2005
#26
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #26
95snoozer said:
obviously that was 324/338

with that cam, you might not brake 300.
Click to expand...

Gah.... I should known that. Although I have heard horror stories of people not matching parts up right, and getting HORRIBLE results from it. Oh well.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jun 28, 2005
#27
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #27
i say you stick a real intake on there and a comp xe274 something of that size that will clear.

RPM intake should get you there... port the lower of the intake, and port match.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jun 28, 2005
#28
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #28
how ported is your intake? you might not brake 315 with it but you will haev enormous torque with the right cam... if thast the way you want to go. in a heavy vert i sure would want some midrange i can tell you that dynoing low and going fast is way better than being a dyno queen.

look at the fellow cobra intake fti cam car
or you might look into a ported performer intake that has flow numbers closer to your heads. i know the afm stage II ported flows 265 cfm, at least my friend's did on the car i mentioned. that combo would be great in a vert.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 28, 2005
#29
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #29
CManT1914 said:
Why do you wish you hadn't swapped to an FTI cam? From the very beginning all I really was expecting was a good 300 (okay okay, I was wanting a little more) to the wheels. I figured if the TFS package boasted 350 flywheel, given the obligiatory 15% drivetrain loss, that would come in at JUST under 300 (like 298 or so). So I figured with my full exhaust, the few bolt-ons I have, and my fuel system (still waiting on a fuel pump) I could see at least 300. Now I know that while it is possible, I won't get my hopes up in case I don't see it. Is that pic of your 347? I was looking at it for a minute thinking, "what's wrong with that motor? the top half of the block is gone!" Then I realized it was upside down, and that the "top half" was actually where the oil pan sits. lol Looking good!
Click to expand...

Because it wasn't cost effective. I ended up with some lean issues. I should have kept the tfs cam and just added longtubes, a bigger tb and kept my NOS 5115 kit and had fun.

Yes, thats my 347
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Jun 28, 2005
#30
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #30
CManT1914 said:
Gah.... I should known that. Although I have heard horror stories of people not matching parts up right, and getting HORRIBLE results from it. Oh well.
Click to expand...

Ok I have the trickflow Kit. I ran a 13.2 @106.6 my first time out at the track with a 2.0 60' time on street tires. I still have the stock Throttlebody which is definitely holding me back. I also run Shorty headers. My car makes tons of power, nothing wrong with the trickflow combo that they put together for you.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Jun 29, 2005
#31
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #31
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=559655

he just made 331 at the wheels with a 302 + the kit.
 

95WhiteVenom

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
624
0
16
Alabama
Jun 29, 2005
#32
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #32
Well Chris you can't make everyone happy. Look I have personally seen a heavy ass vert. with basically your set-up. I'm not sure about some of your other supporting parts but anyway here is the jist of it. That vert. was a dude I met at the track one night. TFS heads, Extrude Honed Cobra, and TFS Stage 1. He mainly got the tfs cam cause he said he wanted a off the shelf cam and said he liked the idle. So after talking to him I saw the dyno sheet. This is non ported heads mind you and he was 308RWHP i have since forgotten the torque (dangit!). Anyway that cam will do great but if you port those heads the power range will be a lil higher in the rpms. Therefor this cam may fall of in power on the upper end. I would wait to port them and when you do decide to port them get another cam. Its hard to down talk this cam cause I have one sitting in my room still in the box, but I know you want the truth.
my guess unported heads with your combo so far your gonna be tapping on the 300hp door so to speak.
Don't worry about that intake it will flow great and will love the combo. I however must tell you this If I were you (and this is me not knowing if you have one or not) I would get a fluidyne before installing the H/C/I. IMHO
Good luck and hope you get everything on and running good.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jun 29, 2005
#33
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #33
Grn92LX said:
Because it wasn't cost effective. I ended up with some lean issues. I should have kept the tfs cam and just added longtubes, a bigger tb and kept my NOS 5115 kit and had fun.

Yes, thats my 347
Click to expand...



mackey said:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=559655

he just made 331 at the wheels with a 302 + the kit.
Click to expand...

You're my hero Mackey! Although unless I read it wrong, it was 311/337 at the wheels, but STILL! Thanks a bunch!

95WhiteVenom said:
Well Chris you can't make everyone happy. Look I have personally seen a heavy ass vert. with basically your set-up. I'm not sure about some of your other supporting parts but anyway here is the jist of it. That vert. was a dude I met at the track one night. TFS heads, Extrude Honed Cobra, and TFS Stage 1. He mainly got the tfs cam cause he said he wanted a off the shelf cam and said he liked the idle. So after talking to him I saw the dyno sheet. This is non ported heads mind you and he was 308RWHP i have since forgotten the torque (dangit!). Anyway that cam will do great but if you port those heads the power range will be a lil higher in the rpms. Therefor this cam may fall of in power on the upper end. I would wait to port them and when you do decide to port them get another cam. Its hard to down talk this cam cause I have one sitting in my room still in the box, but I know you want the truth.
my guess unported heads with your combo so far your gonna be tapping on the 300hp door so to speak.
Don't worry about that intake it will flow great and will love the combo. I however must tell you this If I were you (and this is me not knowing if you have one or not) I would get a fluidyne before installing the H/C/I. IMHO
Good luck and hope you get everything on and running good.
Click to expand...

Are you calling me fat Chris? lol, or just my car? I've been reading about a LOT of TFS combos pushing over 300 the the tire. It's very reassuring. Either way, like Grady said earlier, even 290 is a lot of fun to drive. I'll be happy either way, I just like the thought of being able to say that my car pushes over 300 to the wheels, call me a dork if you want, lol. Why the fluidyne? I never see temps over 195 with my low-speed fan on now, and with my high-speed fan on, it doens't go over 180. Matter of fact, when I'm sitting still it dips a hair below, and that's on the real hot days like today too.

Thanks again!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 29, 2005
#34
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #34
mackey said:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=559655

he just made 331 at the wheels with a 302 + the kit.
Click to expand...

Impressive values, those et's and rwhp numbers, they are

However.............

Is there a chart that shows his pull. I did not see one.

rwhp & low et's alone don't mean everything to me when talking Street Cars......even more so, if I had a Heavy Vert.

Just my opinion......but its mine

Later
Grady
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jun 29, 2005
#35
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #35
final5-0 said:
Impressive values, those et's and rwhp numbers, they are

However.............

Is there a chart that shows his pull. I did not see one.

rwhp & low et's alone don't mean everything to me when talking Street Cars......even more so, if I had a Heavy Vert.

Just my opinion......but its mine

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

Here's his dyno sheet:

 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 29, 2005
#36
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #36
Several things about that dyno sheet.

Looks like the 331 value is tq, not hp, and the hp looks to be about 310.

Its a Mustang Dyno which would not give results more like what we are usued to seeing on a Dyno Jet.

It would be nice to be able to read the rpm values.

I'm sure the car runs strong and I've heard the Mustang Dyno usually gives resusts that are lower than a Dyno Jet.

Later
Grady
 

cavscout371

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
277
0
0
Jun 30, 2005
#37
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #37
I'll see if I cant find a dyno around here somewhere and throw the car on I got to get a new balancer first its making me extremely nervous cars shaking doing 45 1200 r's I'm not going to even through the bottle on till I hit about a 1000 miles on the breakin and get some kind of tune though.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 30, 2005
#38
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #38
cavscout371 said:
I'll see if I cant find a dyno around here somewhere and throw the car on I got to get a new balancer first its making me extremely nervous cars shaking doing 45 1200 r's I'm not going to even through the bottle on till I hit about a 1000 miles on the breakin and get some kind of tune though.
Click to expand...

If you got a bad HB, don't take any chances of doing damage to the motor.

Be Afraid..........................Be VERY Afraid!!!

Later
Grady
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jun 30, 2005
#39
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #39
Speaking of harmonic balancers, I know when they go bad, the rubber starts coming out. Well I've checked mine several times, and there's no rubber coming out from behind it. But I can reach my fingers around behind it, and I can't even feel any rubber anywhere on the backside of it. Would I be able to feel it just by reaching around, or is it like inside the balancer?

Another question. How would my Cobra intake flow compared to a Street Heat, and compared to a Track heat? I might have a line on either one, so I might swap if it's worth it. Any ideas?
 

cavscout371

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
277
0
0
Jun 30, 2005
#40
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #40
final5-0 said:
If you got a bad HB, don't take any chances of doing damage to the motor.

Be Afraid..........................Be VERY Afraid!!!

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

I am I havent drove it in a week waiting till tommorow to get paid so I can buy one. The nickel and dime chit is killing me .
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
What's it Worth? ⚠️ I have a brand new set of original KPI/Trick-Flow High Port Cylinder Heads, Stage 2 Ported
  • GhstRider68
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
14
Views
648
What is it Worth?!?!? Sep 8, 2025
GhstRider68
G
B
Screamin Demons Worth It N/A?
  • Blackout67
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
249
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
G
Anyone Extrude Hone or Flow Bench Speed Pro Heads?
  • giddyup306v1.1
  • Mar 1, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
10
Views
518
Fox Engine Swaparoo Mar 29, 2026
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
769
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?