• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

post the best way to build to get LOW END TORQUE!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Foxfan88
  • Start date Start date May 4, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
May 6, 2005
#21
  • May 6, 2005
  • #21
Then I guess I'm talking about low-midrange grunt as our friend above says.

Isnt HP "a sum of torque under a curve" or something of that sort? I think we are talking about the same thing.

I dont know....I go out and look at my 138,000 mile almost 15 year old motor and I cant envision it doing well being spun up to 5K+. If I tune for a lower powerband, I save the motor and allow it to do it's job without undo wear while at the same time, making the SOTP dyno happy.

I'm automatic so shift points are irrelevant. The AOD is tuned to shift around 4500 rpm.....5200 or so at WOT. My only concern is running out of gear in 3rd. I'm contemplating....going back to 4:10's
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 6, 2005
#22
  • May 6, 2005
  • #22
crazypete said:
Then I guess I'm talking about low-midrange grunt as our friend above says.

Isnt HP "a sum of torque under a curve" or something of that sort? I think we are talking about the same thing.

I dont know....I go out and look at my 138,000 mile almost 15 year old motor and I cant envision it doing well being spun up to 5K+. If I tune for a lower powerband, I save the motor and allow it to do it's job without undo wear while at the same time, making the SOTP dyno happy.

I'm automatic so shift points are irrelevant. The AOD is tuned to shift around 4500 rpm.....5200 or so at WOT. My only concern is running out of gear in 3rd. I'm contemplating....going back to 4:10's
Click to expand...

I got out and look at my 153k mile motor I spin it to 6k...

The original thread maker has a 5spd so that changes it up a bit...

But as I stated...trust me I love driveability (I get into it about that quite a bit) and low end torque...but in reality the car is going to be faster with a powerband that doesn't want to cut off past 4500-5k...relatively speaking...
 

darthcual

Member
Mar 31, 2005
985
19
18
Arlington, TX
May 6, 2005
#23
  • May 6, 2005
  • #23
Dont forget a good suspension and tires to go w/ that power cuz that will make all the difference if you want that pull. If the tires just break loose your not gonna feel that lay back in ur seat holy shmidt im goin fast feeling.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 6, 2005
#24
  • May 6, 2005
  • #24
crazypete said:
Isnt HP "a sum of torque under a curve" or something of that sort? I think we are talking about the same thing.
Click to expand...

HP = TQ x RPM/5252
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
May 6, 2005
#25
  • May 6, 2005
  • #25
The best way to get lots of power from any car is put a big aluminum spoiler (aluminum saves weight) and a LOT of decals...flames, window stickers...

 
5

5.0alltheway

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
32
0
0
carolina
May 6, 2005
#26
  • May 6, 2005
  • #26
i am runnin a stock cam w/gt40ps milled.040,good port and polish .1.7rockers,performer ,and a holley 670w/410s out back.i can burn my 245s thru 3rd just by dumping the clutch at 2500rpm,gobs of torque and low end grunt
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 6, 2005
#27
  • May 6, 2005
  • #27
If you want to build a torque monster look at tmoss' sig (he posted)....
 
B

BubStang

New Member
Jan 28, 2002
17
0
0
Spring, TX
May 6, 2005
#28
  • May 6, 2005
  • #28
Low end torque

The roller cam I just pulled from my 351W made 500ftlbs at 2800rpm and rose gently to 515ftlbs at 6500rpm. It is a custom grind from Lunati, is for sale and I have the cam card and a dyno sheet to show the curve. It has almost no overlap so would likely meet emissions requirements. Your motor might make more or less depending on the ci and head flow, but the curve would be the same. email if you are interested in seeing the card for ideas, or buying it.

Robert@psychowardracing.com
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 6, 2005
#29
  • May 6, 2005
  • #29
When he says low rpm, I think he means MUCH lower than 2800 rpm. Racer low rpm and street car low rpm are usually quite different. And that cam, as you note, would likely react quite differently (wilder) in a 302 than a 351.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 6, 2005
#30
  • May 6, 2005
  • #30
Sorry this is a bit offtopic but, Tmoss...on your website it says put "Make sure you put the beaded side of the gasket towards the head"...but I thought the raised side of the gasket went towards the intake? Or am I talking about two different things...
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 7, 2005
#31
  • May 7, 2005
  • #31
The beaded side goes on the head side - most gaskets are marked with which side is which. The Fel Pro MS93334 kit gasket has the head side marked as such.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 7, 2005
#32
  • May 7, 2005
  • #32
tmoss said:
The beaded side goes on the head side - most gaskets are marked with which side is which. The Fel Pro MS93334 kit gasket has the head side marked as such.
Click to expand...

The FEL-1250 gasket doesn't it have any markings on it I believe. I thought the flat side went against the head and the raised side (silicone looking material) goes towards the intake...that is what "everyone" else says...but not everyone is as intake savvy as you...
 

Ranchero5.0

The Voice of Reason
Jan 1, 1999
5,306
0
76
Hagerstown MD
May 7, 2005
#33
  • May 7, 2005
  • #33
Off topic, but I don't think the 1250's really care. The silicone bead was applied to allow the intake gasket to be reused. Only problem is if you don't use a coating of never seize the dang things tear apart anyway...

Another oddball thing I've found is car with gears (3.73's , 4.10's) seem to spend more time revving than pulling (if that makes any sense). The low RPM cams love to lug down with 3.55's or 3.27's, but don't seem to work as well on a geared car. The E cam hates to lug, but revs quicker on a geared car. I don't want to sound like a meathead, but I've seen stock cammed AOD cars go down the track quicker with 3.73's vs 4.10's or 4.56's. They even sound different.

So the big question should have been 'what cam style works best with a 4.10 gearset' For that I'm thinking either an E or F type cam. For 3.27's or 3.55's, a 2030. 3.55's are about the limit for an E cam with good heads. I've run an E on a stock longblock with 3.27's and even an AOD and it acted and drove almost like a stock cam (weird)

More rambling later.

Jamie
 

twolo4u2c2

5 Year Member
Apr 10, 2003
330
6
29
reading, PA
May 7, 2005
#34
  • May 7, 2005
  • #34
look at my sig......guess what my TQ is. OFF THE SCALE!!
 
B

BubStang

New Member
Jan 28, 2002
17
0
0
Spring, TX
May 7, 2005
#35
  • May 7, 2005
  • #35
Yount, mine is a street car and it is a beast leaving the red lights and stop signs. 2800 is only high rpm in a diesel. It still makes 450ftlbs just of idle, I simply used 2800 cause that is where it hits 500. Whatever the case, the profile of the cam creates a huge amount of low end torque. The cam was designed for the street, not the strip.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 7, 2005
#36
  • May 7, 2005
  • #36
BubStang - What mods do you have? Out of curiosity...
 
B

BubStang

New Member
Jan 28, 2002
17
0
0
Spring, TX
May 7, 2005
#37
  • May 7, 2005
  • #37
its a carb'd 351W with TFS-R heads, roller cam, Vic Jr intake, 10.5:1 compression with a custom AOD tranny.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 7, 2005
#38
  • May 7, 2005
  • #38
Your making 450ft. lbs off idle...and 500rpm in a N/A 351 at 2800rpm?????
 
B

BubStang

New Member
Jan 28, 2002
17
0
0
Spring, TX
May 7, 2005
#39
  • May 7, 2005
  • #39
Yep. It's actually stroked to 408ci. I told a buddy at Schexnayder Racing Engines what I wanted for a street machine and he spec'd the engine build. It's a 351W block from a 1974 Cougar bored .30 with a Eagle 4340 4" crank. SRP rods and I think JE pistons (10.5:1) with TFS-R heads, out of the box no port work. The intake with this dyno config was an Edelbrock 351 AirGap. 2" SuperComp headers, with dual catalyitic converter and Dynomax exhuast. I am in LA right now but will be back Monday and can give the spec on the cam card. It is some Lunati grind. Also with this build it had hydraulic roller lifters with stud mount rockers.

I have since taken that cam out, put in one a bit larger with more duration, replaced the hydraulic lifters with solid rollers. Replaced the AirGap intake with a Vic Jr intake and had Biggs rebuild the 750hp carb. This build made 579/565 on the dyno. Keep in mind the heads out of the box flow quite a bit as the intake valves are 2.08" and the exhuast are 1.6".

In the first build, the cam profile was the secret, I think. I still drive it on the street quite a bit in the Houston area.

I'm looking for a stronger block so I can add a power adder. These stock blocks, pre-1975 I think, can go just over 700hp without trouble.
 

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
May 8, 2005
#40
  • May 8, 2005
  • #40
get a 460 like me, but get a towing cam for it, now thats cracking the windshield kind of torque at the lowend lol.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
954
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
529
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Betty white budget build
  • Stevenmverrill
  • Jun 16, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2023
2Blue2
D
351w na build combo opinions
  • Dan gibson
  • Dec 28, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 28, 2021
Dan gibson
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?