• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Post turbo swap exhaust help

  • Thread starter Thread starter thewrongguy
  • Start date Start date Jan 25, 2004
T

thewrongguy

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
272
0
0
Windsor, ON Canada
Jan 25, 2004
#1
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #1
I've got everything ready for the swap, and planned some time off work so I'll have the time to do it.

Unfortunately I haven't really given much thought to the exhaust system. My plan was to get the engine in and use the stock 2.3 exhaust system for about a month or two before doing a driveway exhaust change.

What work is involved in attaching the 2.3T exhaust to the stock exhaust system. As I said it's going to be a temporary situation and I'll consider any MacGivering.

Thanks

Jeff
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jan 25, 2004
#2
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #2
it would be considerably more work to attached the stock 2.3 exhaust and upgrade than to start with a turbo exhaust in the first place.
for connecting the NA exhaust, you would need a downpipe, and somehow get the exhaust turned to connect it to the NA exhaust. if you look under the car, it is at a wierd angle, with several cats in the way of doing anything.
Just start with a turbo exhaust, but if you can't do that, run an open downpipe, or put a muffler on your downpipe and run it. Trust me, it won't be any louder than my NA exhaust.
 

Lx89Stang05

Founding Member
Oct 18, 2002
1,005
0
0
S.E. Mass
Jan 25, 2004
#3
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #3
i would recomend removing the cats too. when i did my swap i tryed to run it with the cats on the car but. my car wouldnt rev at all. so i took them completely out, if you need cat i would suggest hiflow ones.
 
T

thewrongguy

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
272
0
0
Windsor, ON Canada
Jan 25, 2004
#4
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #4
would you suggest running the exhaust straight back on the passenger side, or dicking around to get it over to the drivers side. The only reason I ask about the drivers side is I'm a little concerned with the fuel lines and filter on the passenger side, I think the frame would seperate the fuel line and the exhaust but I'm just concerned about the fuel getting too hot.

Thanks again

Jeff
 
M

mightypoof

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
523
0
0
Glendale, AZ
Jan 25, 2004
#5
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #5
I don't think there is any problem with the fuel lines. Ive never specifically looked for them, but I do know they enter the engine bay on the drivers side. The turbo actually does a bit of muffling itself. I ran straight out of the turbo for about a week with no problems. It is probably not a great idea but what can ya do? I got pulled over once by a bicycle cop (long story) who informed me my muffler was "broken" lol....
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jan 25, 2004
#6
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #6
I agree with Bhuff but only partially.....
Definately better less work to do the exhaust with the swap. However I'm a cheap SOB so I bent a piece of exhaust pipe to connect a stock DP to an N/A Exhaust system. So you got me there.

I now have what I think is the ultimate...EPA legal exhaust.
Stinger's 3" Down pipe, 3" Connecting pipe, 3" Hi-flow cat, connecting to a Borla XR-1 15" sportsman round track muffler( ) and out the pass. side through a Mac 3" 2 piece tail pipe.
The only part of the system that's not 3" is where turbo outlet elbow is. Coming Soon.
 

conor

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
46
0
0
San Diego, CA
Jan 25, 2004
#7
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #7
Lx89Stang05 said:
i would recomend removing the cats too. when i did my swap i tryed to run it with the cats on the car but. my car wouldnt rev at all. so i took them completely out, if you need cat i would suggest hiflow ones.
Click to expand...

I think there's something else wrong with your car if it wouldn't rev with cats on. Unless you're talking about top-end-near-redline RPMs...
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Jan 26, 2004
#8
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #8
I am picking up my 2 SVO's this weekend and I already have dual 2.5 on my car out of a y pipe after the cat. Will I have to go to the downpipe also to get this to connect? What advantage will I get with 3" over 2.5" pipes
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jan 26, 2004
#9
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #9
kiddiccarus said:
I am picking up my 2 SVO's this weekend and I already have dual 2.5 on my car out of a y pipe after the cat. Will I have to go to the downpipe also to get this to connect? What advantage will I get with 3" over 2.5" pipes
Click to expand...
First I have a question.
You're picking up 2 SVOs, what does that have to do with the exhaust on your car? Are you planning on taking them apart for a turbo swap?
3" exhaust will make the turbo spool sooner. If you go with duals then make sure you have a big Y-pipe.
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Jan 26, 2004
#10
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #10
Yes one of the two will go into my 93 and the other is going to be built up for future usage. So the question pertaining to the exhaust is valid because I need to know so I can make the changes when I put in the SVO.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jan 26, 2004
#11
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #11
kiddiccarus said:
Yes one of the two will go into my 93 and the other is going to be built up for future usage. So the question pertaining to the exhaust is valid because I need to know so I can make the changes when I put in the SVO.
Click to expand...

Are you getting to SVO engines or two SVO's?

Stinger
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Jan 26, 2004
#12
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #12
Engines sorry about the confusion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
560
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
589
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
254
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
874
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?