• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Power Itch , Experienced Guys Step In

  • Thread starter Thread starter TOOLOW91
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 29, 2013
#1
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #1
NIKwoaC I need your cam expertise here as well

everything I had listed below was with a stock crank .


So I have my my old stuff from my motor first off the cam .

Lunati RRN1 218-228 - What do you think about this thing on the street with 3.55 gears (had stock gears when I had the motor in) ?

Pistons and rods . I have Ross racing flat top .030 over pistons and eagle H beam forged 5.400 rods . I want to order a bearing kit and a SCAT stroker crank .

With my old motor I have edlebrock performers with 2.02 valves and springs for the cam I have .

Would this combo work 331 with these heads and cam ? How would drivability be ? Should I sell the cam in favor for let's say a comp xe270?


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 29, 2013
#2
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #2
Basically I am trying not to spend money if I have the parts to do it here and only need a crank, machined block . bearings and a balance .


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 
R

reldla1996

Member
May 4, 2011
356
22
19
Dayton, Ohio
Jul 29, 2013
#3
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #3
If you get a stroker crank, you will need different pistons that match the stroke on your crank, so you will need new pistons as well.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 29, 2013
#4
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #4
Quote my post on this so I remember to come back to this later tonight. Leaving work now, no time to think.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 29, 2013
#5
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #5
NIKwoaC said:
Quote my post on this so I remember to come back to this later tonight. Leaving work now, no time to think.
Click to expand...
will do thanks pal


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 29, 2013
#6
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #6
reldla1996 said:
If you get a stroker crank, you will need different pistons that match the stroke on your crank, so you will need new pistons as well.
Click to expand...
even if they were on a 5.400 rod just stock crank it's gonna affect the stroke enough to warrant the piston being changed ?


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 
R

reldla1996

Member
May 4, 2011
356
22
19
Dayton, Ohio
Jul 29, 2013
#7
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #7
The stock stroke is 3.00, and the 331 stroke is 3.25, so that means if you use pistons and rods designed for the stock stroke, the pistons will stick out of the block by roughly 0.125" with the 331 crank, which means the pistons must be changed. Sorry.....
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 29, 2013
#8
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #8
hey no need to apologize I am here asking what is and what isn't this way I no what I have and what will be cost effective no need to spend on stuff I have


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 29, 2013
#9
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #9
reldla1996 said:
The stock stroke is 3.00, and the 331 stroke is 3.25, so that means if you use pistons and rods designed for the stock stroke, the pistons will stick out of the block by roughly 0.125" with the 331 crank, which means the pistons must be changed. Sorry.....
Click to expand...
I just re read this , I thought I explained my motor that I had had a 5.400 rod in it which is a 331 rod . that's why I want to no If it would work unless what you are saying is the skirt and pin placement is diff but I can't see how I always thought it was a .30 over piston and a 5.400 rod and 3.25 crank you would be at 331 specs


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 29, 2013
#10
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #10
What reldla1996 is getting at, is what's called piston "compression height". Compression height is the theoretical nominal distance from the center line of the wrist pin to the top of the piston. Ideally, compression height is the distance left after you subtract half of your crank stroke and your rod length from your block's deck height. SO, for a 302 with a 5.4" rod, you've got 1.5" for half of your stroke, plus 5.4= 6.9. Deck height is 8.2, so 8.2-6.9=1.3. So your current pistons are probably around 1.3" compression height (any difference is what's called "deck clearance", so if your pistons are actually 1.280, you've got .020 deck clearance or "they're .020 in the hole".)

A 331 uses a 3.25" crank, so half would be 1.625. 8.2-(1.625+5.4)=1.175, so a 1.3" piston would hang a full 1/8 of an inch outside the block, and smash into your cylinder heads.

If you're worried about budget, just build yourself a nice 331/347 with your current parts and enjoy it for what it is. Down the road, when you're ready to upgrade, look into a custom ground cam, and maybe some intake/cylinder head porting. On that topic, you didn't mention what intake you have. Exhaust?
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 29, 2013
#11
  • Jul 29, 2013
  • #11
NIKwoaC said:
What reldla1996 is getting at, is what's called piston "compression height". Compression height is the theoretical nominal distance from the center line of the wrist pin to the top of the piston. Ideally, compression height is the distance left after you subtract half of your crank stroke and your rod length from your block's deck height. SO, for a 302 with a 5.4" rod, you've got 1.5" for half of your stroke, plus 5.4= 6.9. Deck height is 8.2, so 8.2-6.9=1.3. So your current pistons are probably around 1.3" compression height (any difference is what's called "deck clearance", so if your pistons are actually 1.280, you've got .020 deck clearance or "they're .020 in the hole".)

A 331 uses a 3.25" crank, so half would be 1.625. 8.2-(1.625+5.4)=1.175, so a 1.3" piston would hang a full 1/8 of an inch outside the block, and smash into your cylinder heads.

If you're worried about budget, just build yourself a nice 331/347 with your current parts and enjoy it for what it is. Down the road, when you're ready to upgrade, look into a custom ground cam, and maybe some intake/cylinder head porting. On that topic, you didn't mention what intake you have. Exhaust?
Click to expand...
Nik , I have shortys , x pipe , 2.5 all the way back in 2 chamber flow masters . intake is just a truck exp intake . so I realistically need too pick up another set of pistons . I read about compression height right before you posted thanks dude ... so what would be ideal with it all ? should I dump what I have and start fresh ?


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 30, 2013
#12
  • Jul 30, 2013
  • #12
You will definitely want a bigger intake if you're going stroker.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 30, 2013
#13
  • Jul 30, 2013
  • #13
NIKwoaC said:
You will definitely want a bigger intake if you're going stroker.
Click to expand...
Figured , thanks for your help dude


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Jul 30, 2013
#14
  • Jul 30, 2013
  • #14
NIKwoaC

Brainstorm number 1000000 - What about this cam , 1.6rr with twisted wedge heads on a stock bottom end ? too much duration to even bother or is it worth a shot


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 31, 2013
#15
  • Jul 31, 2013
  • #15
You could try it. I'd build a bigger engine first, though.
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 4, 2013
#16
  • Aug 4, 2013
  • #16
Why do you need a crank? Or think you need a crank? If you currently have a 331 and just need a rebuild all you'll need is proper bearings, rings and some machining.

Did you hurt the current 331?

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Aug 4, 2013
#17
  • Aug 4, 2013
  • #17
Rick 91GT said:
Why do you need a crank? Or think you need a crank? If you currently have a 331 and just need a rebuild all you'll need is proper bearings, rings and some machining.

Did you hurt the current 331?

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Rick the old motor I had was a stock crank , 5.400 rods , and custom Ross pistons and it broke the crank and the first journal a year ago .. i still have the rods and pistons and was trying to get away with a budget build .

The motor I bought was second hand already built and the price I couldn't pass on it but in the long run it bit me ...


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Aug 4, 2013
#18
  • Aug 4, 2013
  • #18




Motor was

Lunati RRN1 218-228
Edlebrock performers with 1.7rr
gt40 upper and lower with 24s
5.400 eagle rods
Ross pistons
stock crank (was originally told it was eagle lol )
I paid 1500 and leaned a big lesson no more second hand motors


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 4, 2013
#19
  • Aug 4, 2013
  • #19
So are the pistons like 1.3" CH? Basically it was a long rod 302/306 depending on your bore.

Might be cheaper to just buy a stroker kit or stroker short block depending on exactly what rod it is.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Aug 4, 2013
#20
  • Aug 4, 2013
  • #20
Rick 91GT said:
So are the pistons like 1.3" CH? Basically it was a long rod 302/306 depending on your bore.

Might be cheaper to just buy a stroker kit or stroker short block depending on exactly what rod it is.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
That's it sir ! 1.3 so useless to do anything with , block was garbage so it's gone , I was basically trying to see if. anything I had was worth while or Shojld I just start fresh


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
191
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
A
Engine 04 GT timing chain issue
  • AwesomeX1103
  • Sep 3, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
372
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 5, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
802
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
634
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Progress Thread 351w Build, 67 Coupe
  • redstang67
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
339
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?