i have a stock 289 with a '67 c4. i believe my rear-end ratio is 2.8.
i feel that my engine has a lot more power than what is being put to the asphalt.
i get to high rpm pretty quick, but i'm not going fast or accelerating quick enough to be commensurate with the engine rpm.
is this a product of a weak engine? too low of a ratio for rear end gears? transmission not what i'm looking for?
i'm looking for a setup that will achieve best mpg, and when i'm cruising in 3rd gear at 45+, the rpm seems too high to me to be getting the maximum mpg out of my car.
am i incorrect in my assumptions? any and all advice/criticism would be greatly appreciated.
i feel that my engine has a lot more power than what is being put to the asphalt.
i get to high rpm pretty quick, but i'm not going fast or accelerating quick enough to be commensurate with the engine rpm.
is this a product of a weak engine? too low of a ratio for rear end gears? transmission not what i'm looking for?
i'm looking for a setup that will achieve best mpg, and when i'm cruising in 3rd gear at 45+, the rpm seems too high to me to be getting the maximum mpg out of my car.
am i incorrect in my assumptions? any and all advice/criticism would be greatly appreciated.