• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

power vs. ability vs. mpg

  • Thread starter Thread starter enferno
  • Start date Start date Nov 26, 2006

enferno

Member
Jun 20, 2006
418
2
16
Nov 26, 2006
#1
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #1
i have a stock 289 with a '67 c4. i believe my rear-end ratio is 2.8.

i feel that my engine has a lot more power than what is being put to the asphalt.

i get to high rpm pretty quick, but i'm not going fast or accelerating quick enough to be commensurate with the engine rpm.

is this a product of a weak engine? too low of a ratio for rear end gears? transmission not what i'm looking for?

i'm looking for a setup that will achieve best mpg, and when i'm cruising in 3rd gear at 45+, the rpm seems too high to me to be getting the maximum mpg out of my car.


am i incorrect in my assumptions? any and all advice/criticism would be greatly appreciated.
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Nov 26, 2006
#2
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #2
Well you cant have it both ways...If you want your car to seem to have more power a rear gear change would accomplish that but it will hurt your MPG especailly at highway speeds. This is very basic and not exactly accurate but if you'll think of your engine as an air pump. More air=more power and less MPG. Less air=less power but better MPG. If you want to keep the RPMS down at 45+ look into changing your transmission to an AOD or a t5 which will give you an overdrive gear.
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Nov 26, 2006
#3
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #3
When my 289 was a stone stock C-Code 2bbl with 2.80 rear gears, it averaged 16mpg city and roughly 20mpg highway. This was with fresh everything (point/condenser, wires, plugs, filters, perfectly running Autolite 2100, etc).

As a 2bbl car, it ran out of breath just shy of 5000rpm.

The only difference between your A-Code and a C-Code is the 4bbl and slightly higher compression, otherwise everything else is identical. In a good state of tune, your 289 should get similar mpg to what I said mine got. If it already is getting those kinds of mpg numbers, then that's about right.

If you want your car to accelerate faster and feel like it has more power, as has already been said you mpg will go down, assuming you use traditional horsepower improvers like aftermarket cylinder heads, camshafts, headers, etc.

There are a couple small things you can do to improve both mpg and horsepower.

If you still have point/condenser, replace them with a Pertronix Ignitor or Ignitor II or any similar electronic ignition module that fits inside the distributor cap. This will improve spark energy and won't wear out like points, so you get a little bit more complete combustion which will improve both mpg and power (maybe by 1-2hp, maybe).

You can also replace your stock mechanical fan with an electric fan, this will reduce the accessory driven load on your engine, freeing up horsepower and will help mpg a little as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
690
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2026
Ryu
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
434
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
980
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 29, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?