Pro-M blow through maf issue

HOOKERBEAR

Member

Aug 6, 2011

33

0

7

Utah

Jan 8, 2012

#1

• Jan 8, 2012

• #1

I have a Pro-M blow through MAF for my Mustang and its not reporting proper outputs, idle it reports .27-.29 as high as it reported when revved it barely reported higher than 1. Is this common for Pro-M MAF's? Has anyone else had this issue? Is there any way to combat this issue or do I just need to get a new one?

 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor

Admin Dude

Jan 4, 1985

42,942

21,125

234

Box behind Walmart

Jan 8, 2012

#2

• Jan 8, 2012

• #2

Did it read correctly at any time before this?

I'm not completely understanding you statement above.

What were the readings at:

Idle
Reved
Cruize

What are you feeding through the meter? What power adder? Intercooled?

 

HOOKERBEAR

Member

Aug 6, 2011

33

0

7

Utah

Jan 8, 2012

#3

• Jan 8, 2012

• #3

I'm not sure if it ever read correctly, my computer keeps spitting out a code 66. Ide it reads anywhere from .27-.29 revved its reads up to 1 territory. I've never tried it at cruise. The engine is turbocharged and intercooled. The engine is chipped, without the chip the engine revvs fine with the chip if you get too deep in it seems like it boggs down. Chip on or off the computer spits out a 66 and output voltages seem way lower than they should be (they're supposed to be 0-5v aren't they?).

 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor

Admin Dude

Jan 4, 1985

42,942

21,125

234

Box behind Walmart

Jan 8, 2012

#4

• Jan 8, 2012

• #4

66 MAF voltage low. Short of a pretty decent leak somewhere, I'd say that your MAF is probably bad.

Might consider getting it recal'd.

 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master

Nov 29, 1999

9,692

95

99

PA

Jan 9, 2012

#5

• Jan 9, 2012

• #5

Call Pro-M and talk to Sean.... Ive had great luck with the blow through Pro tubes from them

 

HOOKERBEAR

Member

Aug 6, 2011

33

0

7

Utah

Jan 9, 2012

#6

• Jan 9, 2012

• #6

Someone told me its possible to have low voltages because of wiring. I had to extend my wires and I did so with shrinkable butt connectors. That same someone told me that butt connectors can cause problems with voltage, do you think that would make a difference?

 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master

Nov 29, 1999

9,692

95

99

PA

Jan 9, 2012

#7

• Jan 9, 2012

• #7

I typically solider all of those connections, did you use the same gauge wire?

 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor

Admin Dude

Jan 4, 1985

42,942

21,125

234

Box behind Walmart

Jan 9, 2012

#8

• Jan 9, 2012

• #8

HOOKERBEAR said:

Someone told me its possible to have low voltages because of wiring. I had to extend my wires and I did so with shrinkable butt connectors. That same someone told me that butt connectors can cause problems with voltage, do you think that would make a difference?

Click to expand...

Rick 91GT said:

I typically solider all of those connections, did you use the same gauge wire?

Click to expand...

IMO, This is a MUST. There's too much potential for gremlins with hack wiring and connectors.

 

HOOKERBEAR

Member

Aug 6, 2011

33

0

7

Utah

Jan 11, 2012

#9

• Jan 11, 2012

• #9

Yes, I used the same gauge wire. I cut the butt connectors off and soldiered the wires. I'm seeing better numbers because of it however I'm uncertain if they are still where they need to be. Idle I'm seeing .49-.50 revved around 1.2 higher rev is in 2.1 territory. Is that where it needs to be?

 

HOOKERBEAR

Member

Aug 6, 2011

33

0

7

Utah

Jan 16, 2012

#10

• Jan 16, 2012

• #10

Still getting a 66. Is there anything else I can do to get the voltages where they need to be? Could it be a calibration problem with the sensor itself?