• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Professional Products Harmonic Balancer

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangman1974
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2005
M

mustangman1974

Member
Jan 17, 2004
463
0
16
Jul 26, 2005
#1
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #1
I have noticed this company actually makes a 50oz with the old 65-66 harmonic depth for v-belt alignment. Has anyone used these harmonic balances before? I am finalizing my motor for my mustang and would really not have to fab brackets for the accessories. I was plannign on using the windsor-fox, or ford balancer, but this one look slike it will save me hours on fabing. My motor shoudl make around 385hps when complete so it not to mild.

What does anyone think about these balancers?
 
G

grego37

New Member
May 12, 2004
576
0
0
Fresno CA
Jul 26, 2005
#2
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #2
ive never heard of them.
but then again, it was 10yrs ago when I was piecing together my parts.
 
M

meganjoe

New Member
Sep 27, 2002
35
0
0
The Poconos
Jul 26, 2005
#3
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #3
yes i have one on my 5.0...i originally had a 289 then swapped in the 5.0... the interchangable weights came in handy when i went from 28 to 50 oz...i also believe it was under 100 bucks...Joe
 

TampaStang

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
67
0
0
Tampa, FL
Jul 26, 2005
#4
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #4
Got one on my 5.0 so I could use the old belts..
 

347Fastback

Member
Nov 30, 2003
340
0
17
Central Coast
Jul 26, 2005
#5
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #5
Got one on my 331 and it works fine... They are good deals on ebay for this particular balancer....
 
M

mustangman1974

Member
Jan 17, 2004
463
0
16
Jul 26, 2005
#6
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #6
Those of you with it how often do you drive your rides?

Mine will be a daily driver. I currently have the stock balancer with modified brackets and an underdrive crank pulley for a 70 302 on it.

Also has anyone used the Ford balance drilled for both 3 and 4 bolt pulleys? I have looked and it states its 3.5 in wide. The stock for perfect alignment is 2.78-3 I believe.
 
0

06cobra

Member
Feb 12, 2004
146
0
16
Jul 27, 2005
#7
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #7
Anything by Professional Products. SUX big time.. quality, fit etc is very low. Very disappointed by the entire line.

The intakes are the WORST garbage I've ever seen.

and yes I'm holding back LOL
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jul 27, 2005
#8
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #8
this is what i have in chrome.

ebay link:http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&category=33616&item=7987612545

i did have to have the inner diameter ground down for the crank but it said i needed to in the directions.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jul 27, 2005
#9
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #9
06cobra said:
Anything by Professional Products. SUX big time.. quality, fit etc is very low. Very disappointed by the entire line.

The intakes are the WORST garbage I've ever seen.

and yes I'm holding back LOL
Click to expand...

That may be, but do you actually have experience with the whole product lin....or just an intake? Maybe give some specifics before condemning the whole company.

I have a PP damper that I needed for the same reason as eveyone else(5.0-->classic), but I have yet to use it. It looks decent, but I knew the possibility of it being junk before I bought it(~$78 eBay). It just nodular iron, so its like a stock replacement, but about $30 less than a parts store.I also compared it to my old 1968 part and the dimensions were the same.
 
0

06cobra

Member
Feb 12, 2004
146
0
16
Jul 27, 2005
#10
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #10
We have experience with the whole product line.

Offshore Junk, plain and simple. They are catching up with their foundry and casting procedures etc. But as of this date.the metal composition is terrible, product finish is horrible. For bone stock replacement MAY be ok, but I wouldn't trust it. If dampener lets go, it can make one heck of a mess.

As for the intakes, the darn things look like they've been put together with a puddy knife. Definitely 2 Thumbs down for the entire line. Cheap low quality rip offs is the name of the game. They are great at that game.

EDIT: Power Bond, ATI and others do make Dampeners that work in the Vbelt config. In either 28oz or 50oz
 
D

DKWilkins

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
12
0
0
Dublin, GA
Jul 27, 2005
#11
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #11
I used a harmonic balancer by Fluidamper on my Mach 1. I'm very pleased with it.....

fwiw....
 

ARPM

Member
Jul 8, 2004
116
0
16
PUERTO RICO
Aug 3, 2005
#12
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #12
Since this is a topic of Dampers, Does anyone knows were can i get a chromed 28oz 3 bolt damper for my 68 302? Used or New?

:OT:
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Aug 3, 2005
#13
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #13
06cobra said:
Anything by Professional Products. SUX big time.. quality, fit etc is very low. Very disappointed by the entire line.

The intakes are the WORST garbage I've ever seen.

and yes I'm holding back LOL
Click to expand...

You're the only person I've seen with negative, specifically about the intakes. Most people simply complain that it's not "buying american" (true enough) but wow you really take them to task. Personally, my experiencewith the intakes specifically, though *I* do not personally own one) is that they were good Edelbrock rip offs.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Aug 4, 2005
#14
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #14
I personally own the Pro Products SFI damper and the polished aluminum Typhoon Intake. The only fitment problem was the clearance around the distributor to the clip on the dizzy that snaps the cap on. I had to grind the top edge a little to be able to move the dizzy to advance my timing. Fittment is exactly like the Edelbrock that i had on it before except for that minor trimming that needed to be done. The damper was dead on according to my machine shop when the rotating assembly was balance. Maybe you got a bad one?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Aug 4, 2005
#15
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #15
i bought a PP balancer for my 475hp NA 331. Havent had a chance to use it yet, but my engine builder says that it looks a helluva lot better than ones he has seen come from the parts store.

I also have a polished hurricane PP intake. I test fitted it on my old engine and there was nothing wrong. There is a little bit of smoothing that could be done to the inside of the intake, the runners could be opened up a bit, and the polishing just needs to be touched up. Nothing major at all. For $175 shipped...new, and polished, I couldnt beat it. It was hard to find the equivalent Vic Jr carb intake used and not polished for that price.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Aug 4, 2005
#16
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #16
I have a CAT balancer. It has held up for a few years with constant abuse.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Aug 4, 2005
#17
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #17
I have a balancer with the interchangable weights, and it also is drilled for both 3 an4-bolt pulleys. I'll take a look when I get home and see what brand it is.
 
M

mustangman1974

Member
Jan 17, 2004
463
0
16
Aug 4, 2005
#18
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #18
Well I actually did more research on the harmonic balancer. It looked good. I finally recieved an email from my connection at Ford and found out that ProStreet makes ford SVO's balancers. I purchased one drilled for 4-3 bolt pulleys. So far it looks ok, however it is 1/8 in bigger so I have to grind my bosses on the front cover to get it to work.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Aug 4, 2005
#19
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #19
A little grindin gitsn't unheard of. I had to grind my water pump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
781
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
W
1966 mustang 289 Balance mystery
  • Wardy
  • Aug 15, 2019
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
10
Views
7K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Aug 20, 2019
Wardy
W
Engine Romac Balancer question
  • Justin87
  • Oct 6, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 8, 2019
08GT500
Foxtoberfest 2022
  • FastDriver
  • Sep 6, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2022
Ford Moore
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?