• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Professional Products harmonic balancer

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98BLKGT
  • Start date Start date Apr 17, 2008

98BLKGT

Founding Member
Dec 23, 2001
322
1
0
Chicago area
Apr 17, 2008
#1
  • Apr 17, 2008
  • #1
When buying the PP harmonic balancer, I know I will need the .950" spacer. Do I need a new bolt when using stock size crank pulley or can I reuse the stock bolt? If I do need it, is it some standard bolt where I can get it at a local parts store?
 
F

flyinfoxbody

New Member
Jul 17, 2007
6
0
0
Apr 18, 2008
#2
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #2
I just did this yesterday The big bolt that hold the balancer to the crank will work but the bolts that hold the pulley to the balancer are too short. I went to lowes and picked up 4 grade 8 allen bolts i think they were 3/8x16 and they were 1 and a half inches long they fit perfectly the 2 inch bolts i tried were too long and bottomed out
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Apr 18, 2008
#3
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #3
If you like accurate timing, you'll buy another brand.
This is another one of those cases where you get what you pay for.
I'd use an ATI or Ford Racing.

Looks like you have a quality collection of parts on your car according to your sig, don't cheap out now.
 

98BLKGT

Founding Member
Dec 23, 2001
322
1
0
Chicago area
Apr 18, 2008
#4
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #4
2000xp8 said:
If you like accurate timing, you'll buy another brand.
This is another one of those cases where you get what you pay for.
I'd use an ATI or Ford Racing.

Looks like you have a quality collection of parts on your car according to your sig, don't cheap out now.
Click to expand...
A lot of people here like the Pro. Products balancer. Seemed like it when I did a search.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Apr 18, 2008
#5
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #5
That's because stangnet is the king of all sites when it comes to "i have it, so it must be good". I bet half the guys on this site wouldn't even know if their timing was accurate.

Almost all the time when you find a huge price difference in parts, the cheaper one is built to a lesser standard.

Your car looks to be pretty nice, i honestly wouldn't skimp on the balancer.
 
F

flyinfoxbody

New Member
Jul 17, 2007
6
0
0
Apr 18, 2008
#6
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #6
The timing marks on mine lined up perfectly with my stock one. I lined up the keyways and it was right on the money. And it fit real good anything has to be better than a stock one
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Apr 18, 2008
#7
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #7
ARP balancer bolts are cheap. I bought a cheap Summit balancer and after a year of use (3000miles) the ring became unbonded from the hub and started spinning. Took me about 3 months to figure out what the hell was wrong with my car... So don't buy a cheap damper!
 

98BLKGT

Founding Member
Dec 23, 2001
322
1
0
Chicago area
Apr 18, 2008
#8
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #8
It was too late, by the time I posted this thread I already ordered it and just had q's about the blots. Anyway, since we are on the subject of it's quality, it looks like its a solid piece and nothing can fall apart (unless over-reved). They used it on Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords too. Maybe I'm just trying to make myself feel better for buying it.

Oh, one more question, how do you lock the engine from turning while removing the bolt?

 
R

robertdale

New Member
Jan 31, 2002
382
0
0
kentucky
Apr 18, 2008
#9
  • Apr 18, 2008
  • #9
put the car in 5th gear should do it.
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
Apr 19, 2008
#10
  • Apr 19, 2008
  • #10
2000xp8 said:
If you like accurate timing, you'll buy another brand.
This is another one of those cases where you get what you pay for.
I'd use an ATI or Ford Racing.

Looks like you have a quality collection of parts on your car according to your sig, don't cheap out now.
Click to expand...

Not just the timing thing but the idea it has to do with the balance of the engine. Pretty important to me.

I also put it in 5th to lock the motor from turning, the car might try and run you over a little but the torque will get there soon if you're using a big breaker bar or torque wrench. I believe the torque is 70-90 ft lbs too.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,950
2,905
194
Middle of Maine
Apr 19, 2008
#11
  • Apr 19, 2008
  • #11
I use only the ATI balancer myself. Worked with a machine shop that did only race engines, and he said that there were only 2 things he had ever found that did not need to be "fixed" when buying out of the box parts, one was a set of $15K Chapman Racing cylinder heads for a Windsor (at $15K they better be perfect!) and after testing the ATI baslancer on at least 200 applications and none of them was off by even 1/10th of a gram, and lined up perfect with the degree wheel, he quit testing them as well and just used them straight out of the box. But that is just my experience. If it was me, I would sell the "pro" products dampener and buy an ATI.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Apr 19, 2008
#12
  • Apr 19, 2008
  • #12
Black1987Stang said:
Not just the timing thing but the idea it has to do with the balance of the engine. Pretty important to me.

I also put it in 5th to lock the motor from turning, the car might try and run you over a little but the torque will get there soon if you're using a big breaker bar or torque wrench. I believe the torque is 70-90 ft lbs too.
Click to expand...


Using a torque wrench to break bolts loose will make it inaccurate. I would put a breaker bar against the frame and bump the starter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
1966 mustang starter and pulley troubles
  • Hotrods4ray
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
345
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2026
Realmongo
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
729
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
86
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
668
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine 95 GT and 95 Cobra sensors and TB gasket
  • Sonic
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
314
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 23, 2025
WhiteCobra95
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?