• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

pros and cons of 5.0 vs 4.6

  • Thread starter Thread starter blzn04fx4
  • Start date Start date Jun 4, 2010

blzn04fx4

New Member
Jun 2, 2010
50
0
0
iowa
Jun 4, 2010
#1
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #1
wanna know what the best of both worlds is and the negatives. ive always been more fond of the 5.0 but just throw it all out there whatever you guys think.
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Jun 4, 2010
#2
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #2
I'm pretty sure this is searchable, but you'll get some biased opinions in this section

Our 5.0 has low end torque that is a little harder to find with the modular mill, and generally we will say that the 302 is easier to work on, but I think that has alot to do with old school mentality. New tuners find the 4.6's just as simple to work on due to their computer smarts. Some will say that pushrod parts are cheaper, but that gap is closing every year with the mod motors becoming more and more common

The 4.6 2V was kind of a dog in the first few years, but has come along in the latter years of production before the 3V, and will respond nicely to boost, albeit not so much as a 3 or 4 valve.

The best argument for us 5.0 enthusiasts used to be the sound....nothing beats the growl of a pissed off 302 based set up when you get onto the loud pedal.

That said, some of the 4V Cobra's have a "make me happy in the pants" scream at WOT...gets me every time

I'm sure others will add. That's just my .02
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jun 4, 2010
#3
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #3
Personally if i was looking to buy a mustang right now i would get a 96-98 cobra (that is if a 03 mach 1 or 03/04 cobra was out of my reach $ wise).


The 5.0 is getting really outdated. I want to know how easy a swap will be for the new 5.0 into the 4.6 sn95 mustangs. (if easy at all).



But honestly, i say buy a cheap 94-98 body and throw a LSX in it. Ford just cant compete with the LSX platform for the $ spent.
 

blzn04fx4

New Member
Jun 2, 2010
50
0
0
iowa
Jun 4, 2010
#4
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #4
whats the LSX platform. and thought about trading my truck for a mach 1. i really like styling on them. but where i live i need a truck. but i dont know i have quite a few options just so hard to make one. ive always liked the 5.0 and was really skeptical on the 4.6 especially from 96-99 or so. but the ole lady doesnt wanna see me get rid of the truck but i would love to pick up a mach 1.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jun 5, 2010
#5
  • Jun 5, 2010
  • #5
blzn04fx4 said:
whats the LSX platform. and thought about trading my truck for a mach 1. i really like styling on them. but where i live i need a truck. but i dont know i have quite a few options just so hard to make one. ive always liked the 5.0 and was really skeptical on the 4.6 especially from 96-99 or so. but the ole lady doesnt wanna see me get rid of the truck but i would love to pick up a mach 1.
Click to expand...

Its the engine platform that GM uses. LS1, LS2, LS3, and then a butt load of car/truck engines that are identical pretty much but go under a different name.


Anywho, its looked down upon on many ford sites by the "i bleed ford blue" crowd. But i like american power. I like the mustang body...and just think the engines fall short.

Anyhow, now a days i think if i was shopping i'd opt for a 96-98 cobra...slap a blower on it and call it good.
 
Reactions: PDHSB

whitesqual

Active Member
Sep 3, 2008
235
1
28
Coeur D'alene, ID
Jun 5, 2010
#6
  • Jun 5, 2010
  • #6
The 5.0 has a better aftermarket, more parts available and cheaper.
The 4.6 block can handle much more power than the 5.0
 

GTA_V6_Mustang

Active Member
Nov 29, 2004
1,326
3
39
Miami, FL
Jun 6, 2010
#7
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #7
whitesqual said:
The 5.0 has a better aftermarket, more parts available and cheaper.
The 4.6 block can handle much more power than the 5.0
Click to expand...

actually thats only true with the 4v 4.6 shortblock not the 2v shortblock
 

whitesqual

Active Member
Sep 3, 2008
235
1
28
Coeur D'alene, ID
Jun 6, 2010
#8
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #8
GTA_V6_Mustang said:
actually thats only true with the 4v 4.6 shortblock not the 2v shortblock
Click to expand...

The 2v block is much stronger than the 5.0. The 4.6 block itself can handle upwards of 1000hp. It is true that the Teksid blocks found in the 96-98 cobras are significantly stronger still. They can handle somewhere in the neighborhood of 1500hp. (the newer cobras were somewhere in between) But you are right the SHORT BLOCK out of a 4.6 can not handle any more than a 5.0 due to weak internals! (unless we are talking termis, their shortblock can handle much more!) Where the 5.0 block is the weak point. In my post I was referring to the block only, not the short block.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Jun 6, 2010
#9
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #9
The 5.0 motor is an old school big bore engine. Big bore engines are easier to make power with. Unfortunately the block is much more limited on strength. It can't handle the same power as the 4.6. It also has a 2 bolt main which makes it more likely to get crank walk. The 4.6 was designed basically as a truck motor. It's a small bore engine with a lot more stroke and deck height. It can handle more RPM because it has OHC and deeper block skirts, which cut down on crank motion and vibration. The small bore keeps the detonation down which is why those engines generally work better with boost than a 5.0. Usually a small bore hurts head flow a lot because of valve size and shrowding, but with 4V heads, it's really not an issue.

The LSX engines are so succesful becuase it's a big bore engine matched with deeper squirts and a more modern head design. You get that same big bore power without giving up block strength or RPM. Unfortunately, they are also pushrod engines which hurts performance. However, for most street applications it's not even an issue.

Kurt
 

GTA_V6_Mustang

Active Member
Nov 29, 2004
1,326
3
39
Miami, FL
Jun 6, 2010
#10
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #10
whitesqual said:
The 2v block is much stronger than the 5.0. The 4.6 block itself can handle upwards of 1000hp. It is true that the Teksid blocks found in the 96-98 cobras are significantly stronger still. They can handle somewhere in the neighborhood of 1500hp. (the newer cobras were somewhere in between) But you are right the SHORT BLOCK out of a 4.6 can not handle any more than a 5.0 due to weak internals! (unless we are talking termis, their shortblock can handle much more!) Where the 5.0 block is the weak point. In my post I was referring to the block only, not the short block.
Click to expand...

gotcha thats why I specifically stated shortblock but all good.
 

whitesqual

Active Member
Sep 3, 2008
235
1
28
Coeur D'alene, ID
Jun 7, 2010
#11
  • Jun 7, 2010
  • #11
revhead347 said:
,,,,, deeper squirts,,,,,,

Kurt
Click to expand...

deeper squirts!
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jun 7, 2010
#12
  • Jun 7, 2010
  • #12
if you posted this same thread in the mod motor forum you would get the sway for the 4.6, here you'll get 5.0.

i think it really depends on your end goals. If you want a simple to mod to death car then 5.0. If you want something to just drive around and mod a bit then 4.6. They both have a potential for big power with the right budget.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Sticky
Free Beta Access: Tool I Built to Hunt Fox Bodies Faster
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
516
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2026
FastDriver
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
837
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
945
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
No spark. 1990 foxbody 5.0 gt
  • Boogi
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2025
Boogi
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?