• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Prothane Motor Mounts - Taller or Shorter than stock?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khyron
  • Start date Start date Jun 6, 2009

Khyron

Member
Oct 20, 2006
68
0
6
Lincoln, NE
Jun 6, 2009
#1
  • Jun 6, 2009
  • #1
Hey all,

I have the prothane "bullet" motor mounts on my car, and am getting ready to add a Super Shaker intake. Does anyone know if the prothane motor mounts are taller or shorter than the stock mounts? If they are taller and raised the engine higher, I fear I'm going to have to put the stock mounts back in. Anyone know?

Thanks!
 
O

o0Dan0o

Founding Member
Feb 8, 2001
485
1
0
Jun 6, 2009
#2
  • Jun 6, 2009
  • #2
I have a pair on mine as well, and as far as I can tell they are the same height.
Dan
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Jun 6, 2009
#3
  • Jun 6, 2009
  • #3
i do not see any designation of them being any different than stock height.

i did fill out the contact us form and ask for you. also asked (again) for them to make a tranny mount.
 

StonePony

New Member
Jan 10, 2006
218
0
0
Jun 8, 2009
#4
  • Jun 8, 2009
  • #4
They are approximately 1/4" higher than stock. Many people have them lathed down 1/4" to make them stock height and up to 3/4" for dropping the engine 1/2".
 

Khyron

Member
Oct 20, 2006
68
0
6
Lincoln, NE
Jun 8, 2009
#5
  • Jun 8, 2009
  • #5
Well I was able to answer my own question by just comparing the Prothane mounts to the stock mounts. As you can tell from the photos, they are nearly identical in height. When measuring, the stock mount is actually 1/64th of an inch taller. So there you have it. Engine height should not be affected.


View attachment 254962

View attachment 254963
 

white07gt-cs

New Member
Dec 20, 2006
103
0
0
Jun 9, 2009
#6
  • Jun 9, 2009
  • #6
Khyron said:
Well I was able to answer my own question by just comparing the Prothane mounts to the stock mounts. As you can tell from the photos, they are nearly identical in height. When measuring, the stock mount is actually 1/64th of an inch taller. So there you have it. Engine height should not be affected.


View attachment 254862

View attachment 254863
Click to expand...
.
.
.



AH HA!! But how do we know that the table is level,, hmmmmm? JK
 

KLO

New Member
Jul 4, 2007
28
0
0
Jun 10, 2009
#7
  • Jun 10, 2009
  • #7
Khyron said:
Well I was able to answer my own question by just comparing the Prothane mounts to the stock mounts. As you can tell from the photos, they are nearly identical in height. When measuring, the stock mount is actually 1/64th of an inch taller. So there you have it. Engine height should not be affected.


View attachment 254859

View attachment 254860
Click to expand...

Now explain this to me, what happens when you put the motor weight on it? Rubber squishes more then poly. Go ahead say it......D'OH!!!! Lol. The Prothanes do raise the motor slightly. Did on mine at least when I installed my LT's
 

Khyron

Member
Oct 20, 2006
68
0
6
Lincoln, NE
Jun 10, 2009
#8
  • Jun 10, 2009
  • #8
KLO said:
Now explain this to me, what happens when you put the motor weight on it? Rubber squishes more then poly. Go ahead say it......D'OH!!!! Lol. The Prothanes do raise the motor slightly. Did on mine at least when I installed my LT's
Click to expand...

Agreed.. So now the question is, just *how much* of a difference is there with the weight of the motor on the mounts?
 

StonePony

New Member
Jan 10, 2006
218
0
0
Jun 10, 2009
#9
  • Jun 10, 2009
  • #9
They raise it 1/4". I already shared that with you. I have been through this.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Jun 15, 2009
#10
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #10
prothane never answered my question.
 

anthony05gt

Active Member
Mar 18, 2006
1,262
1
37
Maryland
Jun 15, 2009
#11
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #11
My engine was absolutely raised 1/4'' with the Prothanes. You can cut the 1/4'' off of the Prothanes without a doubt to make it the same height as stock...did it already.
 

retfr8flyr

Member
Jun 24, 2006
154
13
19
Jun 16, 2009
#12
  • Jun 16, 2009
  • #12
When I installed mine it raised the engine almost 1/2 inch and caused all kinds of fitment problems with my cold side piping. It took a couple of days to figure out it was the mounts that were causing all the problems. I ended up going with the JDM lowered mounts and everything lined up correctly.


Earl
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Jun 17, 2009
#13
  • Jun 17, 2009
  • #13
They do raise the motor ~1/4" ..
 

Khyron

Member
Oct 20, 2006
68
0
6
Lincoln, NE
Jun 18, 2009
#14
  • Jun 18, 2009
  • #14
Good news! The Super Shaker is now on the car with the full height Prothane motor mounts. It definitely is a slightly tigher fit, but nothing to worry about. The plan was to put the Super Shaker on and check the fitment. Then if needed, put the stock mounts back on. Fortunately, clearance is totally fine and everything fits great.

I imagine the extra 1/4" height is a real issue when trying to install items like long-tube headers. However for the Super Shaker, it was just fine. This made me happy because I really didn't want to put the stock mounts back in!
 

anthony05gt

Active Member
Mar 18, 2006
1,262
1
37
Maryland
Jun 22, 2009
#15
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #15
Glad to hear that. I have longtubes with the prothanes and not even close to hitting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
294
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
217
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
626
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Motor Mount Question
  • Willybill32
  • Aug 12, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
481
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2024
nickyb
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
268
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?