• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Quad Shock Debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangzroastrice
  • Start date Start date Jun 2, 2004

stangzroastrice

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
278
0
16
Belmar, NJ (Jersey Shore)
Jun 2, 2004
#1
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #1
ok, i put in new senstratic shocks, pro3i non adjustable tubular upper control arms, and non adjustable lakewood lower control arms, all with polyurethane bushings. My question is, do i really need these quad shocks? this is going to be my daily driver so i don't want it to handle like **** or anything because yeah i'm focusing more on straight line but also want to make sure my cornering or anything doesn't get ****ed up by taking these out. also i dont want a **** load of wheel hop either so thats another factor to consider. any suggestions as to whether ill need to keep these in or not? let me know !!! thanks
 

TwinTurbo93

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2002
153
0
0
Orlando
Jun 2, 2004
#2
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #2
Take out the quad shocks, as soon as you replaced you upper and lower control arms you made them obsolete.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jun 2, 2004
#3
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #3
Take them out, but don't throw them away- many people have thought what TT93 said and found out they were wrong. There's more to it than that, and unless you want to run huge slicks, they aren't hurting anything.
 
C

custom89stang

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
705
0
0
Seattle, WA
Jun 2, 2004
#4
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #4
I am getting new KYB shocks/struts/ and QUADS on this saturday making way for the rims i am getting, if i put 275's on the rear of my rim (17X8.5) should i just have the guy flip the quad shocks when hes putting the new ones in? or do you think 275's will fit on a KYB normally? in an 89 wheel well?
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jun 2, 2004
#5
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #5
Can't hurt to flip 'em either way, can it? May as well!
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 2, 2004
#6
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #6
IMO, any decent upper and lower control arm setup shouldn't need the quad shocks anymore. I could see them causing binding in the rear suspension as well, they weren't really designed for the movement of aftermarket pieces.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jun 2, 2004
#7
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #7
Quad shocks were put there to dampen any excessive movment that causes wheel hop, and these excessive movements were cause by the weak UCA&LCA's the factory installed. More stabalizers/dampeners than actually shocks. If you have aftermarket UCA and LCA's then you really don't need them because you fixed what they were designed to fix.

What I don't understand is the "get rid of them asap" attitude as though the do something bad. If you run bigger tires just flip them.
 

stangzroastrice

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
278
0
16
Belmar, NJ (Jersey Shore)
Jun 2, 2004
#8
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #8
ok sweet, i won't throw them away but i'll take them off. thanks for the help guys
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 2, 2004
#9
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #9
it's a common misunderstanding to believe that good aftermarket control arms will solve the wheel hop issue. this is simply NOT the case most of the time.

Generally, most will remove them and never have a problem, however, there is another percentage of us who launch, hard.

I can launch with my pro3i arms at 2k all day long with no quads, but as soon as I start launching real hard, my arms hop all over the road. My buddy tony with aftermarket arms thought his problem was solved and went so far as to tell me something was wrong with my car if I had wheel hop still. THEN he went to the strip and tried a few HARD launches and got massive wheel hop.

Remove em, but don't throw them away. if you are into racing pretty hardcore, you're gonna need em again.

Leaving them on will NOT result in any binding issues. Lateral movement of the axle and binding issues are concentrated on the rear upper/lower control arms, and the quads will not effect that.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 3, 2004
#10
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #10
v8only said:
it's a common misunderstanding to believe that good aftermarket control arms will solve the wheel hop issue. this is simply NOT the case most of the time.

Generally, most will remove them and never have a problem, however, there is another percentage of us who launch, hard.

I can launch with my pro3i arms at 2k all day long with no quads, but as soon as I start launching real hard, my arms hop all over the road. My buddy tony with aftermarket arms thought his problem was solved and went so far as to tell me something was wrong with my car if I had wheel hop still. THEN he went to the strip and tried a few HARD launches and got massive wheel hop.

Remove em, but don't throw them away. if you are into racing pretty hardcore, you're gonna need em again.

Leaving them on will NOT result in any binding issues. Lateral movement of the axle and binding issues are concentrated on the rear upper/lower control arms, and the quads will not effect that.
Click to expand...

It was my opinion, so I'll ask: what is it that makes you think because your Pro3i arms don't eliminate wheel hop that other's don't either -- and that it's a common misconception? Part of the idea of aftermarket control arms is to eliminate that problem. I've seen the same DESIGN arms that launch "hard" and never have wheel hop -- hard enough to break parts, hard enough to break part of the arms even -- still no wheel hop. If that's the case, I would tend to think the wheel hop problem lies in those particular arms you have.

Like I said, it was only my opinion -- but check out some other cars that launch "hard" -- see if it's just cars that run Pro3i or similar control arms that need the quad shocks. Look around at cars that run really fast on stock type suspensions...I don't think you'll find them there. I know I've never seen or heard of a car with UPR or similar suspension that needed them.

As for the quad shocks causing binding, again, it was only my opinion, but I think an arm that eliminates wheel hop, then throw in another piece connected to the frame horizontally, it may not allow the suspension to work as well as it should.

Hey -- I could be wrong, but I have to go by what I see...
 

powershift351

New Member
Apr 2, 2004
225
0
0
Carlsbad, Ca.
Jun 3, 2004
#11
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #11
a panhard bar, and torque arm set-up will definitely eliminate the quad shocks. One of those two, I can't remember each one. Check out www.maximummotorsports.com/ta.asp , and www.maximummotorsports.com/panhard.asp
 

Qwk88LX

Member
Dec 1, 2003
202
21
19
Sunrise, FL
Jun 3, 2004
#12
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #12
Well, I've been running without quad shocks for a while..I don't get wheel hop but then again I don't launch that hard & even when I replace my converter I'll probably launch around 3k. I didn't notice a big difference in handling, actally I like the ride better without the quads. I plan on installing a panhard bar and upper & lower control arms along with some drag shocks.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 3, 2004
#13
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #13
89MustangGX said:
It was my opinion, so I'll ask: what is it that makes you think because your Pro3i arms don't eliminate wheel hop that other's don't either -- and that it's a common misconception? Part of the idea of aftermarket control arms is to eliminate that problem. I've seen the same DESIGN arms that launch "hard" and never have wheel hop -- hard enough to break parts, hard enough to break part of the arms even -- still no wheel hop. If that's the case, I would tend to think the wheel hop problem lies in those particular arms you have.

Like I said, it was only my opinion -- but check out some other cars that launch "hard" -- see if it's just cars that run Pro3i or similar control arms that need the quad shocks. Look around at cars that run really fast on stock type suspensions...I don't think you'll find them there. I know I've never seen or heard of a car with UPR or similar suspension that needed them.

As for the quad shocks causing binding, again, it was only my opinion, but I think an arm that eliminates wheel hop, then throw in another piece connected to the frame horizontally, it may not allow the suspension to work as well as it should.

Hey -- I could be wrong, but I have to go by what I see...
Click to expand...

actually, I have the pro3i arms, and my friend I think has southsides. My experience is from just that. I'm no expert, but I've read a whole lot on this. there is a certain suspension guru on another board who is a god at suspensions, and he preaches the same thing all day long, that good arms will not gaurantee elimination of wheel hop. If you want, as a civil debate, i could research and post up a few links, as he's able to go into a technical explanation that I cannot.
 
S

Sevan

Founding Member
Dec 4, 2001
558
0
16
IL
Jun 3, 2004
#14
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #14
Over winter I did my whole suspension, but I want to talk about the Quad shock theory and due to a tight budget I picked up a set of Steeda lowers and Police uppers, but went with stock shocks and springs and I thought once I removed my quads that I would not have any wheel hop, not the case. On easy launchs it was fine until I punch it and it did massive wheel hop. Hard launches were even worse. So its hard to say that by removing the quads you will eliminate wheel hop. My fix was to get an adjustable pinion snubber its a quick and cheap fix and no more wheel hop.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jun 3, 2004
#15
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #15
Because there's more to it than control arms. Wheel hop can also be cured with the right shocks and springs. Every case is different, since every cars springs and shocks have a different degrees of abuse in their history. I've seen separate cars running the same arms, some had hop and some didn't. It just isn't that simple. Every suspension is a package, and there's a lot more to it than any one or two parts. If the package isn't put together right, then there's no guarantees that anything will work right.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 3, 2004
#16
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #16
A friend of mine has no quads and stock arms, and he hops like crazy. When he's taking corners if he steps on it hard enough to break the tires lose, you can actually feel the axle shifting sideways under the car.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 3, 2004
#17
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #17
v8only said:
actually, I have the pro3i arms, and my friend I think has southsides. My experience is from just that. I'm no expert, but I've read a whole lot on this. there is a certain suspension guru on another board who is a god at suspensions, and he preaches the same thing all day long, that good arms will not gaurantee elimination of wheel hop. If you want, as a civil debate, i could research and post up a few links, as he's able to go into a technical explanation that I cannot.
Click to expand...

Definitely interested...I have no more input than just what I've seen firsthand, and the usual what's been said deal -- but I'll read and analyze anything.

Sevan said:
Over winter I did my whole suspension, but I want to talk about the Quad shock theory and due to a tight budget I picked up a set of Steeda lowers and Police uppers, but went with stock shocks and springs and I thought once I removed my quads that I would not have any wheel hop, not the case. On easy launchs it was fine until I punch it and it did massive wheel hop. Hard launches were even worse. So its hard to say that by removing the quads you will eliminate wheel hop. My fix was to get an adjustable pinion snubber its a quick and cheap fix and no more wheel hop.
Click to expand...

I've heard of some people using the "police" uppers, which are just factory uppers with stiffer bushings in them. To me, I couldn't see it making that much of a difference, but what do I know anyway? I like the adjustable pinion snubber idea, I've seen them, but have never used them. But, I wonder if it has any other side-effects since it's limiting axle travel by pushing up on the body of the car??? I wonder if it may cause a loss of traction if severe enough???

stangbear427 said:
Because there's more to it than control arms. Wheel hop can also be cured with the right shocks and springs. Every case is different, since every cars springs and shocks have a different degrees of abuse in their history. I've seen separate cars running the same arms, some had hop and some didn't. It just isn't that simple. Every suspension is a package, and there's a lot more to it than any one or two parts. If the package isn't put together right, then there's no guarantees that anything will work right.
Click to expand...

I agree with that 100%. Back in the day, it wasn't looked down upon to go get the cheapest pair of shocks you could find because they'd be nice and soft. Of course control arms weren't around like they are now, so it was different. Now with the availability of aftermarket parts, I think I assumed we were talking good known springs and shocks, etc.

What I think I should have said, is that with a good aftermarket suspension you shouldn't need quad shocks. That's my side of the debate.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jun 3, 2004
#18
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #18
I like it when we're on the same page
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jun 3, 2004
#19
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #19
rip the quad shocks out...end of story
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 3, 2004
#20
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #20
Bone Racing said:
rip the quad shocks out...end of story
Click to expand...


you've got a decent setup. I noticed you had a stock suspension...have you taken your own advice yet? No offense, but your sig is either outdated, or you have no personal experience with this. It's one thing to be an online tech warrior, and another to remove the quad shocks and have your wheels bounce all over the pavement on a 3000k launch, and experience it in person.

there have been some good ideas and points here. My buddy with the wheel hop problem put an airbag in his spring so he could inflate it for the track to help keep his wheels planted. this seems to have worked for him. Some good adjustable uppers to adjust the pinion angle for the races would help, as well as a panhard bar and full complement of the maximum motorsports lineup, unfortunetly my budget (for now) will be a $20 set of quads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Quad shocks
  • keel
  • May 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
420
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2026
Mustang5L5
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
C
Suspension Rear suspension help
  • Clark302
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
336
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
Clark302
C
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
216
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Wheels-Tires Quad shock quandry
  • gearhead77
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2024
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?