• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

QuarterHorse vs. AMS PMS

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lifted94XLT
  • Start date Start date Dec 30, 2010

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
Dec 30, 2010
#1
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • #1
Hey Guys. I have a 92 Mustang that I just finished up. Engine specs are in my sig. and I'm planning on goin turbo in a year or so, but anyway, I'm trying to decide what tuning software I should go with. there's a HUGE price difference between the two and major features like tuning on the fly with the PMS and not needing a laptop, but I wanna do it right the first time. is everybody happy with their Quarter horse setup? I know a lot of guys using the PMS that absolutely love it, but have not heard a lot of feedback on the 1/4Horse. How is it, is it easy to tune? any other input? Thanks guys. I just wanna make sure I can still use whatever I get as my car changes and "grows"

--Ryan
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Jan 1, 2011
#2
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #2
QH will allow more adjustment for idle and part throttle conditions , the key is to get a good quality MAF and make sure there are no bends just before the MAF sensor , the PMS is ok if you have a track only car and are only worried about WOT , otherwise get a QH and get it dialed in then you can leave it alone .....
 

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
Jan 2, 2011
#3
  • Jan 2, 2011
  • #3
Thanks for the info. my question next would be, what's a good MAF to go with? I have a C&L now and have heard differing opinions on them.
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Jan 13, 2011
#4
  • Jan 13, 2011
  • #4
I wont tell you dont get quarterhorse, cause ive never heard of them. I have the PMS and its easily the best thing ive ever done. Love it! As far as mass air meters, PMAS is good, i also like my Abaco DBX. The DBX is a bit pricey, but you bever have to have it calibrated and it grows with your setup!
 

87coupe50

Member
Feb 10, 2008
105
1
16
WAYNESBORO, PA
Jan 13, 2011
#5
  • Jan 13, 2011
  • #5
+1 on the QH and DBX
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jan 15, 2011
#6
  • Jan 15, 2011
  • #6
QuarterHorse has a MUCH steeper learning curve than the PMS does. It's not impossible to learn, but it is definitely more difficult than the PMS. I've been researching different engine management systems, because I'm not sure if I should hold onto my PMS when I build my turbo setup. Megasquirt has caught my interest, but I'm still not too sure if I feel like re-learning a completely different system.
 
D

DonMaximo

Member
Sep 25, 2003
217
5
19
Lewisville, Texas
Jan 18, 2011
#7
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #7
#1 - I have no experience with the AMS PMS, so I have no comment. I do understand it has a hefty price tag though.

I have a Moates QH with my setup. I've also purchased the software license for the Binary Editor and Engine Analyzer. In the least, you'll need the Binary editor for making changes.

You should definitely acquire the Engine Analyzer for capturing datalogs of your runs. This will help you identify areas for improvement.

Before you consider an DIY computer/ECU tuning solution, you really should educate yourself on all that is required and involved.
Go Here: EECTuning.org • Index page
Read the FAQ --- Search for the article:
Things to know BEFORE buying a TwEECer or Quarterhorse

It's been a long time since I've read that article, but you're going to spend quite a bit of money to even get to a point of capturing data logs. Wideband O2 sensors are not cheap, Moates QH card, additional 5 position switch, Binary Editor Software, Engine Analyzer software, weld-in bung for WB-O2 sensor....yada yada yada. There's a fair expense and a little time required just for reaching a point to begin using your DIY solution.

The next step is to "KNOW" what to change... and to what value. There is no quick support line to call...share your datalogs with...or receive recommendations. The forums are good for seeking help, but you cannot count on them.

The long & short of this is that there is a learning curve when performing this work on these older computers. It takes a lot of reading and understanding before you should initiate change.

I would offer a 3rd option to you... and that is to get your car into a chassis dyno where a qualified technician can burn you a chip. A good shop will also go out for a drive around the neighborhood to ensure that your engine maintains some sense of civility for street driving...and after flogging the engine, she returns to her street manners properly.

Yes...you'll need to do this for each "substantial" change you make to the engine. My local guy charges ~$300 for a tune. You're going to spend much more than this for all the DIY equipment you're going to need...hell, I spent more than $600 on all my stuff.

In short...you mileage may vary. But unless you're prepared to get into understanding the Ford ECU in your car, then you should probably consider having a Pro burn you a chip on the Dyno.
((Do Not order a custom burned chip online --- penny wise, but pound foolish).

Just my thoughts... which are subject to errors.
 

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
Jan 18, 2011
#8
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #8
DonMaximo said:
#1 - I have no experience with the AMS PMS, so I have no comment. I do understand it has a hefty price tag though.

I have a Moates QH with my setup. I've also purchased the software license for the Binary Editor and Engine Analyzer. In the least, you'll need the Binary editor for making changes.

You should definitely acquire the Engine Analyzer for capturing datalogs of your runs. This will help you identify areas for improvement.

Before you consider an DIY computer/ECU tuning solution, you really should educate yourself on all that is required and involved.
Go Here: EECTuning.org • Index page
Read the FAQ --- Search for the article:
Things to know BEFORE buying a TwEECer or Quarterhorse

It's been a long time since I've read that article, but you're going to spend quite a bit of money to even get to a point of capturing data logs. Wideband O2 sensors are not cheap, Moates QH card, additional 5 position switch, Binary Editor Software, Engine Analyzer software, weld-in bung for WB-O2 sensor....yada yada yada. There's a fair expense and a little time required just for reaching a point to begin using your DIY solution.

The next step is to "KNOW" what to change... and to what value. There is no quick support line to call...share your datalogs with...or receive recommendations. The forums are good for seeking help, but you cannot count on them.

The long & short of this is that there is a learning curve when performing this work on these older computers. It takes a lot of reading and understanding before you should initiate change.

I would offer a 3rd option to you... and that is to get your car into a chassis dyno where a qualified technician can burn you a chip. A good shop will also go out for a drive around the neighborhood to ensure that your engine maintains some sense of civility for street driving...and after flogging the engine, she returns to her street manners properly.

Yes...you'll need to do this for each "substantial" change you make to the engine. My local guy charges ~$300 for a tune. You're going to spend much more than this for all the DIY equipment you're going to need...hell, I spent more than $600 on all my stuff.

In short...you mileage may vary. But unless you're prepared to get into understanding the Ford ECU in your car, then you should probably consider having a Pro burn you a chip on the Dyno.
((Do Not order a custom burned chip online --- penny wise, but pound foolish).

Just my thoughts... which are subject to errors.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info and I agree, but the reason I'm considering this is because I've got a buddy that owns a shop with a dyno and is experienced in GM tuning (OBDI and OBDII). He has offered me all the help and time to learn if I go this route, as he wants to get into tuning fox mustang and fords in general.
 
M

mhinchley

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
6
0
1
Elkhart, IN
Feb 7, 2011
#9
  • Feb 7, 2011
  • #9
I just bought a car with the PMS in it already. http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-for...stang-gt-convertible-over-40-pics-inside.html
I am going to give it a go, since the car is already tuned with it. I have used more complex tuners, namely Digital Horsepower Powertuner for a 400whp Grand Prix I built a couple of years ago, but that system took me a year to somewhat master. The learning curve on this PMS looks to be not nearly as sharp, nor the scope so broad (may be a good or bad thing). I inquired with a reputable Mustang tuner nearby ( http://www.brenspeed.com/ ) about dyno tuning, but they want me to change to SCT chip, $300 and Dyno/tuning fee of $500. Only problem is they are an hour away and any problems or changes......and I have to get the car, or at minimum, the chip to them. Therefore I am leaning on keeping this and doing a quick learn. After all, my car is supposed to be tuned already............but I want it on a dyno and logged to be certain. Anderson is 4 hours from me in IL, so I may just trailer the car there and have them check it on the dyno, since it is their PMS. Interesting article I found on the PMS though several years old: Mustang PMS Programmer - Piggyback Stride - 5.0 Mustang & Super Fords Magazine
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Feb 7, 2011
#10
  • Feb 7, 2011
  • #10
DonMaximo said:
#1 - I have no experience with the AMS PMS, so I have no comment. I do understand it has a hefty price tag though.

I have a Moates QH with my setup. I've also purchased the software license for the Binary Editor and Engine Analyzer. In the least, you'll need the Binary editor for making changes.

You should definitely acquire the Engine Analyzer for capturing datalogs of your runs. This will help you identify areas for improvement.

Before you consider an DIY computer/ECU tuning solution, you really should educate yourself on all that is required and involved.
Go Here: EECTuning.org • Index page
Read the FAQ --- Search for the article:
Things to know BEFORE buying a TwEECer or Quarterhorse

It's been a long time since I've read that article, but you're going to spend quite a bit of money to even get to a point of capturing data logs. Wideband O2 sensors are not cheap, Moates QH card, additional 5 position switch, Binary Editor Software, Engine Analyzer software, weld-in bung for WB-O2 sensor....yada yada yada. There's a fair expense and a little time required just for reaching a point to begin using your DIY solution.

The next step is to "KNOW" what to change... and to what value. There is no quick support line to call...share your datalogs with...or receive recommendations. The forums are good for seeking help, but you cannot count on them.

The long & short of this is that there is a learning curve when performing this work on these older computers. It takes a lot of reading and understanding before you should initiate change.

I would offer a 3rd option to you... and that is to get your car into a chassis dyno where a qualified technician can burn you a chip. A good shop will also go out for a drive around the neighborhood to ensure that your engine maintains some sense of civility for street driving...and after flogging the engine, she returns to her street manners properly.

Yes...you'll need to do this for each "substantial" change you make to the engine. My local guy charges ~$300 for a tune. You're going to spend much more than this for all the DIY equipment you're going to need...hell, I spent more than $600 on all my stuff.

In short...you mileage may vary. But unless you're prepared to get into understanding the Ford ECU in your car, then you should probably consider having a Pro burn you a chip on the Dyno.
((Do Not order a custom burned chip online --- penny wise, but pound foolish).

Just my thoughts... which are subject to errors.
Click to expand...

This guy is 100% right in his accessment. I've been playing around with tuning for a couple of years now and you really need to be deticated to learning it. I've read the ford eec epc manual about 20 times, the aem tuning guide, both tweecer and eec analyzer/be manuals and follow all the forums with regards to tunining. And at this point I still don't know all there is to know but with that being said theres nothing like feeling that you tuned your own car and make big power. I enjoy learning so it's a fun process.
 

09secondGT

Member
Mar 4, 2006
79
0
6
KY
Jun 28, 2011
#11
  • Jun 28, 2011
  • #11
love my pms, starts great, idles great, drives great and smooth at part throttle, and wot is great too.
 

f8tlfiveo

My wife likes my spool and blow-off valve.
Aug 8, 2007
1,585
102
64
Lancaster, PA
Jun 28, 2011
#12
  • Jun 28, 2011
  • #12
I love my quarterhorse.. Don't really know a whole lot about tuning so I paid decipha on eectuning.org to tune my car via datalogs...he has been great and the car runs and drives great.. It only cost me 100$ for him to tune it until I was happy.. So altogether with all of the software wideband and quarterhorse I ended up spending about 700 bucks with the tune..and the drivability is great..
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 28, 2011
#13
  • Jun 28, 2011
  • #13
None of the above. Read about megasquirt.

I just installed mine and had it tuned, the car runs mint, there is a ton of adjustability, it uses a plug and play harness, only costs 600 dollars, has a built in MAP sensor, ELIMINATES the MAF(that saves you hundreds alone).

All in all, you could have the car running within about 2 hours from the time USPS drops off the megasquirt, and it took my tuner about 20 minutes of using it before he was making power pulls, and about 30-45 minutes of street tuning, and it was running mint. Hook a wideband to it, and it also eliminates the need for the factory narrowband o2 sensors.

I dont know about the quarter horse, but megasquirt VS. PMS is a no brainer. PMS is more expensive, and much more limited on what can be done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
Fuel stroker help
  • junkyardwarrior
  • Jan 16, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2021
junkyardwarrior
J
S
1995 mustang gt anderson pms problems
  • Samplebridge
  • Mar 15, 2018
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 19, 2018
General karthief
S
1995 mustang anderson tuner
  • Samplebridge
  • Mar 10, 2018
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
0
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 10, 2018
Samplebridge
S
M
Progress Thread Monkeybutt2000's 89 vert build thread- 408w build in progress
  • Monkeybutt2000
  • Apr 4, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
437
Views
68K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2026
2Blue2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?