• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Question about the 4.6 ltr

  • Thread starter Thread starter nitrousrush
  • Start date Start date Feb 15, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

forpit2000gt

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
2,490
0
0
Columbia, SC
Feb 15, 2004
#21
  • Feb 15, 2004
  • #21
stock means about 220-225 rwhp. you will not run 12s. I ran 13.8s with 230 rwhp on a lightly modded 2000. Sticky tires and suspension will get you a little more. I know now that without any weight reduction , it takes practice and about 250-260 rwhp to get high 12s or very low 13s on a GT.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Aug 10, 2006
#22
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #22
 

bgrd351

Member
Jun 10, 2005
109
0
17
Jacksonville, Fl
Aug 10, 2006
#23
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #23
do you ever get the feeling someone is trying to get info on mustangs to see if they can beat us? hmmmmmmm
 

mustangkid05

New Member
Mar 10, 2006
199
0
0
Aug 10, 2006
#24
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #24
n/m lol
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Aug 10, 2006
#25
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #25
nitrousrush said:
So my friend he already has a brand new gt its red 4.6 ltr and he just bought another one its black. He thinks its the fastest thing on the road.. its not it has 250 hp he says hes runnin 12s lol. How much hp do you think he would have to have to run 12s and how much money would have to be dumped into it. I ask him why he dont just get a svt he says he dont know? thanks... dan
Click to expand...
When you say brand new, do you mean an 06'?
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Aug 10, 2006
#26
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #26
look at the date on the thread, this was brought back from the dead.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Aug 10, 2006
#27
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #27
bdcardinal said:
look at the date on the thread, this was brought back from the dead.
Click to expand...

Ahhh!!!! I didn't notice that!
 

Kronos

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
101
0
0
the boondocks
Aug 10, 2006
#28
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #28
In'till'zah said:
I forgot that my friend has some minor mods on his car. I keep forgetting that people here are very unforgiving to others for being wrong.

Hence the low post count, don't want to put up with the crap.
Click to expand...

well its because people who are wrong try to argue automaticly making them gay which causes us to unload the facts:SNSign:
 
S

saleen556

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
387
0
0
Hillsboro,OR
Aug 10, 2006
#29
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #29
CanadaStang said:
When you say brand new, do you mean an 06'?
Click to expand...
04
 

96BlueStangGT

Member
Jul 7, 2004
38
0
16
Southern Indiana
Aug 10, 2006
#30
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #30
SaleenGT2001 said:
Click to expand...

when i saw the original post date.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 11, 2006
#31
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #31
gruntman31 said:
Y0u can do mid 12's on 250 RWHP with slicks, suspension, weight loss, and driving skills.
Click to expand...

I'd have to see it to believe it, in a full weight car. No reductions.
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Aug 12, 2006
#32
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #32
5spd GT said:
I'd have to see it to believe it, in a full weight car. No reductions.
Click to expand...

gruntman31 said:
Y0u can do mid 12's on 250 RWHP with slicks, suspension, weight loss, and driving skills.
Click to expand...



MD
http://forums.************.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1877

Before reading on I just want to say that this is basically geared towards drag racers not your average enthusiast looking for 12s on street tires with no real changes to the car. Not that it can’t be applied to someone looking for that but this is geared more towards the people out there looking for 12s and willing to work for it.

1.) Power – If you listen to some old school drag racers they may say you need at least 300+RWHP to hit 12’s in most cars. In some heavier cars that may be true but fact is suspensions are more refined these days and cars don’t weight 4,000 lbs. Most PI headed cars will hit the 245-255RWHP mark with basic mods (Pulleys, Timing Adjuster or chip, O/R H or X, K&N or other type of high flow filter and although not a power mod…gears 4.10s or 4.30s). For a bolt on GT this is enough power to get the car into the 12s after you follow the other steps. Keep in mind more power will make it easier to reach your goal or help offset more weight (see next section) but it can be done with less.

2.) Weight - You basic 5 speed coupe without driver weights 3250lbs. So with an average driver weighing about 180lbs that puts your race weight at 3430lbs. At that weight and a power to weight ratio of .075 you would need 258RWHP to hit 12’s. Power to weight is the power of your car (rear wheel) divided by race weight of the car. Using my car when I broke into the 12’s first time I was making 246RWHP and had a race weight of 3250lb, which worked out to a .075 power to weight ratio or .075RWHP per pound of the car. From what I’ve seen a car can get into the 12s with a .075 to .080 P/W ratio. So if your race weight is 3430lbs then 3430 * .075 = 257.25RWHP. As long as you keep this ratio in the .075 to .080 range you are fine plus keep in mind you can drop weight instead of adding power. An example of this is a car with a 3000lb race weight could break into the 12s with 225RWHP (close to stock power on a GT).

Now I’m sure some of you are asking about weight reduction. Basic weight reduction would be rear seat delete, removal of spare tire, jack, tire iron…these would knock a good 70-80lbs from the car. Add a set of welds or light weight race wheels and you are looking at another 60-80lbs. For more information about specific weights and more ideas look here… http://users.adelphia.net/~mustang-9...0Reduction.htm

3.) Suspension - I feel that this component has the most leeway so to speak. I’ve seen near stock suspension cars get good weight transfer. I honestly believe a car that meets the other requirements could hit 12s on the stock suspension. However those of you that want to get an edge should read on. First thing I would do is look at springs since most of us want a better stance but still want weight transfer. For that look at fox body 4cyl front springs I usually look to the junkyards for these but most buy stock replacements at a local shop (avoid Moog brand though they are taller than stock specs). For the rear end I go with fox body v8 rear springs cut anywhere from a ¼ to 1 coil to level out the car. Just keep in mind that it’s easier to cut too little than too much spring.

Next I would highly recommend a pair of sub-frame connectors welded in to tie the chassis together. Hard launches on slicks will twist the body and this will help keep it straight. Last piece to really help out is struts I went with Lakewoods because they are readily available and affordable but adjustables can be used as well if you have the budget for them. 70/30s and 90/10’s both work well and I stick with fox body specific struts since the car is lowered. Fox body specific springs are ¾” shorter than stock SN-95 springs so the lower fox body specific struts are shorter.

4.) Traction – I’ll cut to the chase here and just skip over street tires and drag radials and go right to slicks. Not that it can’t be done on these tires but it will take more power, more patience and much more writing on my part so we’ll stick to slicks. Cars in this weight range and power level only need a 26x8.5x15 ET Drag for traction. It’s close to stock tire height and is more than enough to make our cars hook on the track. A better suspension will result in better 60 foot times but even on stock suspension a good burnout on slicks will not spin unless the track is poorly prepped or fluids are on the track. Some people opt for cheap steel wheels which I don’t necessarily recommend since you are keeping extra weight on the axles. This opens you up for possible breakage so I would go with a weld wheel instead even if it’s a pair of used ones for track only purposes. Regardless a 15x8 with 5 on 4.5 bolt pattern and 5.5 backspacing will fit perfect, or if you insist on a wider tire like a 10” then a 15x10 with 5 on 4.5 bolt pattern and 6.5 backspacing will also work on our cars.

5.) Practice – This is one component that you can’t buy at any store, you can learn it from a text book and you can’t ask your friends about you simply have to get out there. I’m not saying everyone should be like me and hit every test and tune but don’t expect to make one trip and bingo your in the 12’s. I race on slicks for 3 months before hitting my first 12 second pass. Going to slicks alone was a big change that I had to adjust to before I got the hang of and learned to shift better, etc… Take your time, get comfortable in the car and have fun with it. Do that and you’ll achieve your goal.

Now that you know the key components to get into the 12’s you have to keep it all together.  In the above situation I would highly recommend an aftermarket shifter just to help keep the transmission alive longer. The biggest weakness in the above is the differential and axles. Not to say they can’t take some abuse because they can, mine went almost a full year of launches on slicks before breaking. I would look at a set of 31 spline axles and an Eaton or Ford 31 spline differential beefed up to keep the back end in one piece.

Bill
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Aug 12, 2006
#33
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #33
old thread revival....someone is bored tonight
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Aug 12, 2006
#34
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #34
nitrousrush said:
he wants to race my friend with a gsx will he get blazed... my friend has apexi n1 exhaust on his gsx 3 inched not cat. and he also got a greddy type 2 bov and boost controler?
Click to expand...

depends what year GSX and if it has anything done

if its a 1g(90-94) GSX and a manual, it comes with the 14b turbo which is a very slick turbo for a stock car. with a boost controller he can up the boost to 16-17psi on stock fuel system and run mid 14's. stock fuel system tops out at that level. if its an automatic, they have a 13c turbo and smaller injectors and cant run the same levels as a manual unless that **** is swapped out.

on a 95-99 GSX, they both(auto and manual) come stock with a T25 turbo, its a very small turbo, quick spooling but nothing up top, it can muster 15psi to redline, but after that its just hot air, he could set it to 20-22psi but all it will do is spike to that and drop to 15psi by 5k. same rules apply with the fuel system, pretty much limited to under 17psi of boost until you upgrade.

if he has done any actual mods like change out the turbo, or done his fuel system, then yeah, the stang will probably get pwned. the 14b can be efficient to around 20psi at redline, and he just needs a fuel system to push it. the T25 will have needed to get replaced to something bigger to take a stang.

BOV's do not increase power. they simply vent the air(and he should be recirculating not venting to atmosphere unless he has more advanced stuff which i will not get into) from the intake tract. the 3" exhaust and no cat, is great for alerting cops to your presence, and no cat helps with spool,

I am and will always be an avid DSMer. only reason i sold my last one is cause i realized FWD sucks, and there are no AWD for sale for the right price or condition in my area.
 

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Aug 12, 2006
#35
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #35
for the reading impaired..

THREAD IS 2.5 YEARS OLD, ORIGINAL POSTER IS NO LONGER HERE. KTHXBYE

 

military_stang

New Member
Aug 11, 2006
13
0
0
Hill AFB, UT
Aug 12, 2006
#36
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #36
I used to have a 01 stang and i was told that it had 290 and the engine.. does that mean that the 260 was at the wheels???

military_stang
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,244
17,924
224
Massachusetts
Aug 12, 2006
#37
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #37
'01 GT's have 260HP at the flywheel. Only the '01 Bullitt GT was the only SOHC to have more than that. It had 265HP at the flywheel.

At the wheels you prob have 225-235HP
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Aug 12, 2006
#38
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #38
this old and most of the original posters don't come here anymore.. so I am thowing the lock on it
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 12, 2006
#39
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #39
military_stang said:
I used to have a 01 stang and i was told that it had 290 and the engine.. does that mean that the 260 was at the wheels???

military_stang
Click to expand...

If that is an 05 GT in your sig, you probably have about 260rwhp. Is your car stock?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
608
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
550
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
4.6 question for those in the know....
  • LILCBRA
  • Aug 30, 2024
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 4, 2024
Adieu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?