• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Question on 99-up calipers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Killercanary
  • Start date Start date Jan 27, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 27, 2004
#1
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #1
I think I remember reading on here that the 99-newer front calipers are made of aluminum and are lighter than our stockers, can anyone confirm this? Has anyone done this swap? If so, what all is needed? I'm looking for ways to lose weight and upgrade at the same time. Any info is appreciated.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Jan 27, 2004
#2
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #2
Im pretty sure oink did it. Try searching his name..
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 28, 2004
#3
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #3
Thanks Jesse, I found it... if anyone else wants to see it here it is:


http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=388902
http://sn95brakes.cjb.net/
 
9

9lb302

New Member
Dec 29, 2003
54
0
0
Jan 28, 2004
#4
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #4
I bought front take offs from Saleen off an 02 GT a while back, $66 shipped to my door. Don't forget the SS brake lines when you upgrade!

If you call Saleen and they say they don't have any, call back in a day or 2 (I called back a few days later, talked to a different guy...he said it could be 2-4 weeks, they were on my door step 3 days later).
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 28, 2004
#5
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #5
Thanks for the heads up, I appreciate it!!!
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jan 28, 2004
#6
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #6
I did it Paul...They are lighter..and work slightly better. The spindle end has to be sanded slightly to fit.

Also, there was a specific bolt that was needed... We did the job at Javi's house, and he had that extra bolt...but I forgot what it was. BTW..the reason was that we swapped lines to SB also. If you keep the stock lines, it should be direct swap.
RC
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Jan 28, 2004
#7
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #7
94GTLaserRC said:
I did it Paul...They are lighter..and work slightly better. The spindle end has to be sanded slightly to fit.

Also, there was a specific bolt that was needed... We did the job at Javi's house, and he had that extra bolt...but I forgot what it was. BTW..the reason was that we swapped lines to SB also. If you keep the stock lines, it should be direct swap.
RC
Click to expand...

How much lighter are they?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 28, 2004
#8
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #8
Oink said ~16lbs for the set lighter. If I do what I have planned, I will be knocking off ~60lbs of unsprung weight, and with moving the battery to the rear... that should be ~100lbs off the nose. I think that will help me on my quest.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 28, 2004
#9
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #9
Rob, where did you get the SB lines at? Do they really make for a better pedal feel? My brakes feel so "spongy." I wanted to go with cobra's up front, but the added weight, and problems with caliper clearance are not worth it to me now.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jan 28, 2004
#10
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #10
I would say they cant be MORE than 5 lbs each. I think I got the lines from Summit.

They do give it a slight bit more "immediate" feel.

Paul, No matter which brakes you use, you HAVE to upgrade with the amount of power that thing is running.

Good luck
RC
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Jan 28, 2004
#11
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #11
I've been thinking about this upgrade, since my front brakes are about dead. I think I'm stopping primarily on suspension and tire!

Does anyone know of the 99+ rear calipers are also lighter than the stock 94-98 ones? I may wanna go ahead with those if it's enough.
 

GTPhreak

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2000
5,505
0
77
Rowlett, TEXAS
Jan 28, 2004
#12
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #12
the rear calipers are the same cast varga calipers as on the 94-98
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Jan 28, 2004
#13
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #13
GTPhreak said:
the rear calipers are the same cast varga calipers as on the 94-98
Click to expand...

Really? You'd think that they'd match the fronts.

I guess it'll just be fresh pads & such for the back. That's just less cash to put out.
 

red94fiveo

New Member
Apr 12, 2003
1,269
0
0
Wichita, KS
Jan 28, 2004
#14
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #14
Killercanary said:
Rob, where did you get the SB lines at? Do they really make for a better pedal feel? My brakes feel so "spongy." I wanted to go with cobra's up front, but the added weight, and problems with caliper clearance are not worth it to me now.
Click to expand...

Paul - Do you know how much more the Cobra brake weigh up front? I'm thinkin of getting a set for my car.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 28, 2004
#15
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #15
Check the link I posted above, I think it said they are 60lbs, I'm not sure what our stock setup weighs though.
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Jan 29, 2004
#16
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #16
Today on job I been thinking about swaping front calipers and rotors with Cobra ones, so is there any difference betwwen 94-95 and 96-98 Cobra front brakes
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jan 29, 2004
#17
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #17
Seth5.0 said:
Today on job I been thinking about .....
Click to expand...
I hope you're not a surgeon or something.
How were you concentrating at work?
RC
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Jan 29, 2004
#18
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #18
i m not sure but i think the cobra brakes weigh less than the gt's do because of the calipers being alum instead of steel ! the rotors are vented so i think even if they are bigger they don't weigh that much more ? i have my stock brake set up paul and will try and weight it friday afternoon.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Jan 29, 2004
#19
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #19
Seth5.0 said:
Today on job I been thinking about swaping front calipers and rotors with Cobra ones, so is there any difference betwwen 94-95 and 96-98 Cobra front brakes
Click to expand...


The Cobra calipers are PBRs, just like the 99+ mustangs have in the front, but they have bigger pistons I think. They are aluminum.

The Cobra rotors are 13", compared to the '94+ V6/GT stock front rotors, which are 11"

I put the 99+ PBRs on my g/f's '94, and I didn't notice much of a difference. I was told that they help stop better from high speeds, and it seems to be true, as I did find a difference from high speeds, but be careful, the PBRs can warp your 11" rotors if are agressive with the brake (such as 100+mph to 0mph or something of the sort)

Also, one brake line on the 94-98 will not fit with the PBRs, I think it's the right side. I got a brakeline from the right side of a wrecked '01 and it bolted right in on the chassis, and caliper.

I am putting Cobra front brakes on my car as soon as it is warm enough.
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Jan 29, 2004
#20
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #20
94GTLaserRC said:
I hope you're not a surgeon or something.
How were you concentrating at work?
RC
Click to expand...


No i'm not suregon, and I always find time for thinking
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
ATS brake conversion question
  • stackz
  • May 16, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 25, 2024
Mustang5L5
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
543
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
737
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?