• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Questions about plumbing a brake system

  • Thread starter Thread starter 66coupe351
  • Start date Start date Nov 1, 2005
6

66coupe351

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2001
84
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Nov 1, 2005
#1
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #1
I'm in the middle of replacing most of my stock '66 GT brake system and have a few questions I was hoping someone could help with. I'm keeping the front disk/rear drum setup, but replacing most of the parts.

My main question is related to adding a combination valve(metering and proportioning) into the system. Most of the brake line fittings are 3/16"(I think), but the two inputs on the combination valve are slightly bigger(1/4" ?) than that, and the rear output fitting is a little bigger than the inputs(5/16" ?). This has me doing things like connecting a 3/16" output from the MC to a 1/4" input on the combination valve. I assume I use a standard size brake line for this, but then would I use a larger fitting on the comb. valve side of the brake line or maybe a standard fitting connected to a step-up fitting connected to the comb. valve? After writing that all out I think I could probably go either way, but would still like to hear from people who have done it.

A few other side questions:
Know any good places to buy straight lengths of stainless steel brake line? How about stainless fittings?

It appears the only valving the car originally had was a proportioning valve in the rear line. I plan on using a metering valve in the front and a proportioning and residual valve in the rear. I think this a good way to go, but... From you experience is this the correct thing to do? Is it going to be a nice improvement in home the brake system works?
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Nov 1, 2005
#2
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #2
Easiest is to use a larger fitting that works with the smaller line (if that makes sence). But you are correct, there are a few different ways to do it.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Nov 1, 2005
#3
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #3
ditch the combo valve. Just get a T fitting to split the main line for the front brakes, and install an adjustable prop. valve in the line going to the rear brakes. The combo valve (or distribution block) is a pain to plumb, plus they're messy/jumbled looking, and (as you've found) sometimes require some funky and hard to find adapters.
 
6

66coupe351

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2001
84
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Nov 1, 2005
#4
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #4
Well, found that Jeg's has lengths of Stainless Steel tubing pre-flared with ends. They don't seem to have any size adapters, though.

So, maybe the comb. valve isn't worth it? I was hoping it would help to modernize the brake system. Anyone out there add a comb. valve to their brake system or have any opinions on if it is worth it?
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Nov 2, 2005
#5
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • #5
Just dont forget, if you install a manual prop valve, you are going to have to test it and set it correctly, and mark it. Its not a install-and-forget like a stock valve would be, at least the first time out.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Nov 2, 2005
#6
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • #6
LMan said:
Just dont forget, if you install a manual prop valve, you are going to have to test it and set it correctly, and mark it. Its not a install-and-forget like a stock valve would be, at least the first time out.
Click to expand...

Yep, if you lock the rears up on these things at speed it is "loop da loop" time.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
265
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
108
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
A
SN95 Hydroboost in a Fox | Brake lines
  • arc_jpiv
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 14, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?