• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Quick Driveline Question, Old Vs. New...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick Vogelsong
  • Start date Start date Sep 18, 2012
R

Rick Vogelsong

New Member
Sep 10, 2012
10
0
1
Sep 18, 2012
#1
  • Sep 18, 2012
  • #1
How many of you guys have ditched the original trans. and rear for newer units out of the newer cars in search of more efficiency for hp?

Are the new trans. and rears more efficient over the classic stuff?

A lot of stuff I read says yes, but I'd like to hear from someone who's got firsthand experience.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Sep 18, 2012
#2
  • Sep 18, 2012
  • #2
I went from a C4 to a T5 about 20 years ago. One of the best improvements you can do for performance and drivability. You wont gain much in a newer rear end other then disc brakes and gear ratio options.
 
R

Rick Vogelsong

New Member
Sep 10, 2012
10
0
1
Sep 18, 2012
#3
  • Sep 18, 2012
  • #3
iskwezm said:
I went from a C4 to a T5 about 20 years ago. One of the best improvements you can do for performance and drivability. You wont gain much in a newer rear end other then disc brakes and gear ratio options.
Click to expand...

Good to know, while I don't have much experience with the newer rearends a friend of mine tells me they are much easier to work on; which is why he went the route of a rear out of a late 90's mustang.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Sep 18, 2012
#4
  • Sep 18, 2012
  • #4
I wouldnt say a late model rear end is easier to work on, but if you have a 8 or 9", you can set up a second 3rd member with differnt gears and swap them in about 20-30 minutes.
 

331efiblue66

Member
Oct 11, 2006
111
1
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Sep 19, 2012
#5
  • Sep 19, 2012
  • #5
4r70w, 3k stall converter, aluminum driveshaft, 8.8" rear destined for mine. I wish it was road worthy so I could report how much I like it, but for now I'll just dream. Reasons-wanted o/d automatic, got the explorer rear basically free, just swapped some labor(MUCH cheaper than a 9"), I liked the fact it has the "big bearing ends", disc brakes, and lighter than a 9".
 
R

Rick Vogelsong

New Member
Sep 10, 2012
10
0
1
Sep 19, 2012
#6
  • Sep 19, 2012
  • #6
331efiblue66 said:
4r70w, 3k stall converter, aluminum driveshaft, 8.8" rear destined for mine. I wish it was road worthy so I could report how much I like it, but for now I'll just dream. Reasons-wanted o/d automatic, got the explorer rear basically free, just swapped some labor(MUCH cheaper than a 9"), I liked the fact it has the "big bearing ends", disc brakes, and lighter than a 9".
Click to expand...

This was the direction I was thinking only with a T5, and a CF driveshaft.
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Sep 20, 2012
#7
  • Sep 20, 2012
  • #7
I had a T5 as I was looking at less rotating mass and drag on the drive line. As far as straight line driving, not sure if the T5 would have ever been faster than the C4. There is probably more potential, but I don't think I would ever get to the point where my driving and all the other suspension was at a point where I would have realized the potential. I did pull it on my motor swap and went with a TH400, probably even less efficient than the C4, but this build will probably be at the upper limit of the C4. When I upgrade next time I will have room to grow. I wish I would have thought about this the 1st time, and save a few thousand dollars. It would have been more efficient to go with the TH400 the first time in terms of money spent.

Also, I do have a Strange drop out 12" rear in that fits in a Ford 9" housing. It is more efficient than the 9", and stronger than the 12 bolt. You also get the other benefits of a 9" (ease of gear change, etc.) and I can put a 9" pumpkin in my rear end if I wanted. If your not looking for every little bit, probably not worth it, but an option.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
632
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
450
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sunday at 1:36 PM
joeybuddy96
J
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
424
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
681
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?