• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

quick subframes questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter squeeeg
  • Start date Start date Feb 1, 2004

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
Michigan
Feb 1, 2004
#1
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #1
Which is better round tubular subframes or the square ones that connect to the seat bolts as well. I am looking at ebay and they have both and i was wondering which is better. What are the pros and cons of both.
 

NO_RICE

Founding Member
May 5, 2001
405
1
16
Tucson, AZ
Feb 1, 2004
#2
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #2
The cross member that connects to the seat bolts is going to be better, it wont let the seat bolts rip the sheet metal (floor pan). Steeda makes round subframes that have the option of cross members, however I have heard that the rectangular ones are just as strong, offer better ground clearance, and give you more surface area to be welded. I think it is completely preference though.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Feb 1, 2004
#3
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #3
Technically, round will be stronger than square (stress points), however, given the fact that there is less area to weld and less ground clearance -- it certainly is a toss-up. Personally, I have alwasy had square tubing.
 
B

bapford

New Member
Jan 17, 2004
40
0
0
Feb 1, 2004
#4
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #4
[I've used both, and the round ones seem to make it much stiffer and support more stress and weight. They are probably about the same for street driving, but we have used the round ones much more on the track. (road race)
 

bigsparky

New Member
May 14, 2003
334
0
0
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Feb 1, 2004
#5
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #5
Does anyone have pics of round ones put in?? I'd like to see how low they actually are
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Feb 1, 2004
#6
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #6
yep square aren't as strong as tubluar ones
 

ram360

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2002
2,162
1
59
Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 2004
#7
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #7
The tubular subs I have really don't hang any lower than the exhaust (I'll post some pics tomorrow if nobody beats me to it) . The car seems to be realtively stiff considering it's a t-top car w/ only welded subs stiffening the chassis at this point. I've always heard the tubular subs are stronger but any form of subframe is better than none at all.
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Feb 1, 2004
#8
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #8
bigsparky said:
Does anyone have pics of round ones put in?? I'd like to see how low they actually are
Click to expand...


You can see them if you look really closely......I have never had a problem with the being too low.

 

bigsparky

New Member
May 14, 2003
334
0
0
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Feb 1, 2004
#9
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #9
ram360 said:
The tubular subs I have really don't hang any lower than the exhaust (I'll post some pics tomorrow if nobody beats me to it) . The car seems to be realtively stiff considering it's a t-top car w/ only welded subs stiffening the chassis at this point. I've always heard the tubular subs are stronger but any form of subframe is better than none at all.
Click to expand...


I would appreciate the pics!!

thanks cevtv.. that helps a bit!

Were they hard to weld in?? I looked on the passenger side where it welds up to the frame near the back, and there's a line of some sort (fuel, brake??) and it seems to be in teh way.. what did you do with it?
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Feb 1, 2004
#10
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #10
bigsparky said:
I would appreciate the pics!!

thanks cevtv.. that helps a bit!

Were they hard to weld in?? I looked on the passenger side where it welds up to the frame near the back, and there's a line of some sort (fuel, brake??) and it seems to be in teh way.. what did you do with it?
Click to expand...



I didn't do the welding...... That is indeed a fuel line, it can be moved out of the way no problem. The subs made an amazing difference in the car.
 

bigsparky

New Member
May 14, 2003
334
0
0
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Feb 1, 2004
#11
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #11
cevtv said:
I didn't do the welding...... That is indeed a fuel line, it can be moved out of the way no problem. The subs made an amazing difference in the car.
Click to expand...


It's a bent steel line.. how can it be moved??? That's the only thing i'm concerned about. Would you be able to get a picture of that for me?
 

ram360

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2002
2,162
1
59
Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 2004
#12
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #12
bigsparky said:
I would appreciate the pics!!

thanks cevtv.. that helps a bit!

Were they hard to weld in?? I looked on the passenger side where it welds up to the frame near the back, and there's a line of some sort (fuel, brake??) and it seems to be in teh way.. what did you do with it?
Click to expand...


looks like he beat me to it. I have the same exact subs on my car.
 

DONRLX

New Member
Mar 30, 2003
3
0
0
Canton, GA
Feb 1, 2004
#13
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #13
I used the square Full length Subframe connectors from Maximum Motorsports.
Then I took them to Road Atlanta and beat on them. I think that they are awesome.

 
B

bapford

New Member
Jan 17, 2004
40
0
0
Feb 2, 2004
#14
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #14
are yours the full length? ie:from rear torque box to front subframe?
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Feb 2, 2004
#15
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #15
bigsparky said:
It's a bent steel line.. how can it be moved??? That's the only thing i'm concerned about. Would you be able to get a picture of that for me?
Click to expand...

There is a clip that holds it in place, remove the clip and you can move it. I'd be able to get a picture if there wasn't all knids of snow and salt on the ground....... it's supposed to rain in the next couple of days - if the driveway clears up, I'll grab a pic.
 
B

bapford

New Member
Jan 17, 2004
40
0
0
Feb 2, 2004
#16
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #16
Sorry guys, I need one of those dummies books for this forum stuff. What is the usual way to reply to a post?? lol
 

bigsparky

New Member
May 14, 2003
334
0
0
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Feb 2, 2004
#17
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #17
cevtv said:
There is a clip that holds it in place, remove the clip and you can move it. I'd be able to get a picture if there wasn't all knids of snow and salt on the ground....... it's supposed to rain in the next couple of days - if the driveway clears up, I'll grab a pic.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what you are talking about (I can't look at mine right now either) but if you could get a pic I would greatly appreciate it. If you want, could you send it to my e-mail? ryansouster@shaw.ca
thanks a lot
 

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
Michigan
Feb 2, 2004
#18
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #18
I still don't know which i am getting but i am leanin twards the square ones with seat supports.
 

DONRLX

New Member
Mar 30, 2003
3
0
0
Canton, GA
Feb 2, 2004
#19
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #19
yeah, mine are the square one, with seat brackets. They run from the Front at the Firewall to the rear torque boxes. They're awesome, currently I'm putting in the 6 point Cage. When I finish this thing will be rock solid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
968
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
326
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
110
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
Paint and Body Subframe seat brace question
  • limp
  • Apr 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
444
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?