• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rancho Part Number

  • Thread starter Thread starter WantaGT
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 4, 2007
#1
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #1
I was looking for the much loved rancho rear shocks for my street/strip 67 mustang and was looking for the part number. In the thread How to Drag Race Your Classic it gave the part number RAN-RS99159. When I went to Summit Racing it listed these as front shocks for a Land Rover, is this right? If not can you give me the number. Thanks!
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Feb 4, 2007
#2
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #2
I believe these are the one's, i have them in my 65.
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=RAN-RS99204&N=700+115&autoview=sku
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 4, 2007
#3
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #3
N/M
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 4, 2007
#4
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #4
is there any I can use on my front?
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 4, 2007
#5
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #5
I messed up--GAstocker had the correct part # in his link-RS99204. They are shocks for a NISSAN TRUCK that was never imported to the states, but work great on a drag Mustang. I also got mine from Summit.

I believe that there are Ranchos for the front, but they are not the best option. It is better to purchase some cheap, adjustable 90/10 shocks, such the ones sold under the Summit brand name.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 4, 2007
#6
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #6
can these be quickly adjusted for a street driven car?
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 4, 2007
#7
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #7
WantaGT said:
can these be quickly adjusted for a street driven car?
Click to expand...


The Ranchos on the rear are easy, just turn the little red knob. 9 actual notch settings, with CCW is being the lightest, CW the firmest. According to Rancho, you can even use the area between the notches too. Here is a Rancho mounted on the rear of my stang showing the knob:




As far as the front shocks, no, not really. They have to be fully compressed and turned in order to change the settings. It is easiest when the shock is fully removed.
 

Attachments

  • 1IMG_0797_tn.webp
    47.5 KB · Views: 156

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 4, 2007
#8
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #8
hmm, what are some options for a street/strip car then. I don't want tool around with 90/10s all of the time lol
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Feb 4, 2007
#9
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #9
Well I know it's probably not the best thing to do but I have the CE 90/10's in the front of mine and just left them in there on the softest setting. It seems to do fine on the road. I don't drive crazy or anything on the street, nice slow stops,don't take curves fast, but at the track they really help to transfer the weight as they release quick...
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 5, 2007
#10
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #10
ga289stocker said:
Well I know it's probably not the best thing to do but I have the CE 90/10's in the front of mine and just left them in there on the softest setting. It seems to do fine on the road. I don't drive crazy or anything on the street, nice slow stops,don't take curves fast, but at the track they really help to transfer the weight as they release quick...
Click to expand...

+1
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 5, 2007
#11
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #11
you could just use some regular old monroe shocks up front, not the gas shocks. won't be quite as good as 90/10's on the track but better on the street.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 5, 2007
#12
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #12
could i get those summits and just set them at the lower settings for a little help at the strip and not as much sacrifice on the street?
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 6, 2007
#13
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #13
WantaGT said:
could i get those summits and just set them at the lower settings for a little help at the strip and not as much sacrifice on the street?
Click to expand...

Yes, you could set them up a little stiffer and will probably be happy. I would think that the stiffest setting would be close to stock.

If nothing else, with a little time, you could try all 3 options to see which one best suits your driving tastes.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 6, 2007
#14
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #14
cool, thanks guys. you gotta love the 26 dollar price tag LOL
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Feb 6, 2007
#15
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #15
Yep. I bought mine for $26 too...They arnt really that hard to adjust...once they are out of the car.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Feb 6, 2007
#16
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #16
btw...as nice as the $26 dollar summit shocks are....the $89 per shock price of the ranchos is not.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 7, 2007
#17
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #17
yeah, well I guess I just need to suck it up LOL, one last question. For a street/strip car would you guys recommend putting six cylinder springs in the front or is the summit shocks/stock springs good enough?
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 7, 2007
#18
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #18
Depends on the car. At first I installed new std 289 springs and the front end seemed stiff even after adding the 90/10's. I just ordered the 6 cyl springs for this summer's fun. Of course I am probably carrying more weight up front than you are due to the 393/large 4 row copper radiator/scatter shield/etc.

If your springs are the old originals, they may work just fine.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Feb 7, 2007
#19
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #19
I'm going to have to suck it up to...No point in having a strong motor and a suspension that cant hook up. Ill be going with 6 cylinder springs up front, as with my 8's, it's still a little too stiff/high.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 7, 2007
#20
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #20
cool, thanks guys. what is a good reputable vendor to go with for the springs. I haven't purchased stock parts in a long time LOL
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
312
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
199
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
144
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?