• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Randalls rack

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cloudbuster
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2003

Cloudbuster

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
12
0
0
Middle TN
Dec 11, 2003
#1
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #1
Is anyone using the power rack and pinion setup from Randalls rack? I have decided to replace the factory power system in my Fastback with an R&P unit, and this is by far the most affordable power unit I have been able to find. For any one who isn't familer with it, here is a link Randalls Rack
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Dec 11, 2003
#2
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #2
http://forums.stangnet.com/search.php?searchid=189877
 

Cloudbuster

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
12
0
0
Middle TN
Dec 11, 2003
#3
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #3
Thanks for the link, but I have already found those post when I did a search on the topic. Unfortunatly nobody on those post has installed the system.
 

Cloudbuster

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
12
0
0
Middle TN
Dec 13, 2003
#4
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #4
I posted this question on a couple other message boards, and didn't get any results their either, so I sent Randall an email with the following questions:

1) After installing this system on my car, what kind of handling should I expect? i.e.: Will the steering be as tight as a modern car?
2) Does your system introduce any bumpsteer problems?
3) Do I need any special tools or skills to complete the installation?
4) How is turning radius affected?
5) Any ground clearance problems?
6) Do I need to purchase any additional parts to complete the installation, or is everything included in the kit?
7) If I ever need to replace any of the components, do I have to get them from you, or can I get them from a local parts store?
8) What is the total cost for the power R&P unit (tax & shipping)?
I also asked him to give me some references of some people who have used the system that I can talk to.

I sent him this email on Thursday morning, but I haven't hear anything back yet. I'll keep you guys posted.
 
D

daveoxide

New Member
Dec 12, 2003
15
0
1
Davis, CA
Dec 13, 2003
#5
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #5
Cloudbuster said:
I posted this question on a couple other message boards, and didn't get any results their either, so I sent Randall an email with the following questions:

1) After installing this system on my car, what kind of handling should I expect? i.e.: Will the steering be as tight as a modern car?
2) Does your system introduce any bumpsteer problems?
3) Do I need any special tools or skills to complete the installation?
4) How is turning radius affected?
5) Any ground clearance problems?
6) Do I need to purchase any additional parts to complete the installation, or is everything included in the kit?
7) If I ever need to replace any of the components, do I have to get them from you, or can I get them from a local parts store?
8) What is the total cost for the power R&P unit (tax & shipping)?
I also asked him to give me some references of some people who have used the system that I can talk to.
Click to expand...

I may be able to answer a few of those questions for you from my experience with a rack and pinion in my mustang.

1) Yes, the steering will be tighter, similar to a modern car. No more "driving like a movie star" to go in a straight line.
2) It may or may not, astleast, it won't make it any worse than it is already . But bump steer can always be fixed with a bump steer kit. Mine bumpsteers just a little bit, just like it did with the old stock setup.
3)????
4) The turning radius will be larger, albeit not as bad as my Taurus rack, but still noticably more than stock. Not a big concern except when in tight parking areas, but it is easily overlooked because of the other significant benefits gained from the rack.
5) ??? Not with mine.....
6-8) ???

I think that you would be very happy with the unit. I will never go back to a recirculating ball again! I have been using my setup for a few years now and it is just incredible how nice it feels, like a new car. I had a fellow classic mustang owner drive my car once and he almost put it in the ditch when he made a turn. He expected the usual slop in the wheel, but there isn't any. He expected to be "driving like a movie star" but instead we were swerving all over the road! Once you go rack, you never go back! Take a look at my webpage for some ideas on what I did to my Mustang.
 

Red Barchetta

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
761
0
17
Behind the Orange Curtain
Dec 13, 2003
#6
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #6
daveoxide, I checked out your site and see that you are using a Taurus R&P unit. Very cool setup. A couple things about your responses.

Bumpsteer. The difference between the Taurus unit and Randall's is that the Taurus is an end take-off whereas the Randall unit is a center take-off. The end take-off units tend to have more bump-steer as you are stuck with the fixed width of the rack. With a center take off, they are able to position the steering linkage in a manner that reduces bumpsteer. Granted, this is assuming the manufacturer has taken this into consideration. Don't think you could ever completely eliminate it, but it can be significantly reduced.

Turning radius/travel. Each rack has a different amount of travel which will affect turning radius. TCP's rack works pretty damn good. I've driven their '67 test mule and didn't notice an increase in turning radius (which is I think what you meant to say). A decrease in turning radius would make the car turn sharper. As a comparison, DB Engineering used to offer a R&P setup (don't know if they still do) but it had limited travel and made for a very poor (increase) turning radius.
 
D

daveoxide

New Member
Dec 12, 2003
15
0
1
Davis, CA
Dec 13, 2003
#7
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #7
Red Barchetta said:
daveoxide, I checked out your site and see that you are using a Taurus R&P unit. Very cool setup. A couple things about your responses.

Bumpsteer. The difference between the Taurus unit and Randall's is that the Taurus is an end take-off whereas the Randall unit is a center take-off. The end take-off units tend to have more bump-steer as you are stuck with the fixed width of the rack. With a center take off, they are able to position the steering linkage in a manner that reduces bumpsteer. Granted, this is assuming the manufacturer has taken this into consideration. Don't think you could ever completely eliminate it, but it can be significantly reduced.
Click to expand...

I agree. But like you said, assuming they have taken it into consideration. Even then, the amount of room you have to move things around inder the oil pan there is minimal, that is why they have those handy little bump steer "sticks" that stick further down on the spindle. But you are right, I do have less options for fixing bumpsteer. The front end geometry on our mustands are so messed up it isn't even funny....

Turning radius/travel. Each rack has a different amount of travel which will affect turning radius. TCP's rack works pretty damn good. I've driven their '67 test mule and didn't notice an increase in turning radius (which is I think what you meant to say). A decrease in turning radius would make the car turn sharper. As a comparison, DB Engineering used to offer a R&P setup (don't know if they still do) but it had limited travel and made for a very poor (increase) turning radius.
Click to expand...

Right, increase, not decrease . I have talked with an owner of a TCP rack about turning radius, and he said it did increase a little, but it isn't too bad. The end to end throw of the original stock steering setup is about 7.75" (if my mind serves me correctly). My Taurus rack is a meager 5.25" of travel, and the Cavalier style rack (center steer, what TCP kinda modeled theirs after) is about 6.25" of travel (once again, my mind is playing games with me today). The trick is finding a rack that has a lot of travel, which basically doesn't exist. So we are forced to use racks with less travel and if we want it to turn sharp, we need to add little pieces that move the tie rod pivot point on the spindle further forward to help decrease the turning radius. It's just a big game of give and take. But would we be having fun if it wasn't!
 

Cloudbuster

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
12
0
0
Middle TN
Dec 16, 2003
#8
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #8
Hi guys,
Randall sent me the following answers to my questions, and then even followed up with a phone call to make sure I didn't have any further questions. He was a really nice guy to talk to, and seemed very up front an honest.
Unfortunatly I won't be able to use his system until I upgrade to a T5. Apparently there are some clearance problems between the steering shaft and the Z bar (No clearance problems with an automatic).
Here's the email he sent me:

Thanks for the mail Jason,

I had a serious computer virus and have been catching up on mail. Sorry. I will go through your list and try to help you out.

1 The handling of your car is improved a huge amount over your original system but it is unfair to compare it to a modern car. New cars have an entirely different design from the ground up. All the way from geometry to materials used throughout the car. The difference in having R&P in your car is dramatically better than the old ford steering though.

2 MMMMM Bump steer! WE have simply copied the geometry that ford designed into the car with he exception of having the center link slightly higher to compensate for cars that have been lowered to help minimize bump. Our system does not introduce any but but rather helps to minimize it.

3 No special skills other than being good with tools. System comes with easy to follow pictures and explanations.

4 Tuning radius is about 3 feet larger and is not an issue in 95% of street driving. No different than tcp. If you modify the spindle like I show on our web site it will give you a stock turning radius. The other guys don't tell you that. You can also add on a bump steer kit. They are designed to move the outer tie rod ahead which will do the same job.

5 ground clearance will depend on how much you chose to lower your car.

6 You need to buy the inner late model granada/mustang tie rods

7 The rack will have to be supplied from us. It is not available over the counter in the same configuration as ours.

8 We can have a system to you for $1100. S/H
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
Easton, PA
Dec 16, 2003
#9
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #9
Rack & Pinion

Just thought I'd input my experiences....

I've also had a Taurus system in my car for over four years now. Worked great from the start. (pics on my website) My turning circle did increase by a bunch, though I can't give you any percentage numbers to compare. But the advantages outwieghed that considerably. The highway feel is fabulous! No wander, constant wheel correction, etc., just bullet straight. I had evil bump-steer, because of the lower rack lication to clear everything, but the BAER Bump-steer kit fixed that. One funny thing is that I feel much more of the road, even with the Tauruas rag joint still in. Mine too is an automatic, so lots of room. Why not convert to a hydraulic clutch set-up, since it is also a better and more modern way. My next stick Mustang will loose that stinkin' Z-bar the minute it comes home!

If you can find it, I wrote a few articles in the Hemmings Mustang magazine, one of which covers the Mustang bump-steer problem with the rack steering. Try to find it.

Randall's has a good solution, I am also quite curious to hear how it works.
 

Cloudbuster

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
12
0
0
Middle TN
Dec 16, 2003
#10
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #10
There isn't a hydraulic clutch setup available for a 3 speed transmission is there? I thought they were only available for "pull" style clutches.
 
R

randallsrack.co

New Member
Apr 10, 2003
25
0
0
Dec 17, 2003
#11
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #11
Hello guys, Thanks for talking with me yesterday Cloudbuster. I hope you got the answers you needed. Also thanks to Chepsk8 for your work with the Taurus rack. Good motivator.
Our system simply copies the ford dimensions and locates the center link as high as possible to help minimize bump in lowered cars. This does the same job as lowering the outside tie rod.
On our web site I show a "fix" to the turning radius problem. I modified a granada spindle and moved the hole ahead about 1 inch. I had a machine shop put the proper taper to accept a granada tie rod end. With the fix the turning radius is returned to stock. You can also use a bump steer kit to move the tie rod ahead. The manual Omni rack that is used only has a travel of 5 inches vs 6 for this rack. The loss of turning radius with the omni rack cannot be made up by using this modification.
The stock mustang moves about 6-1/2 inches. Our rack is 6 inches.
Be aware that the Omni rack that is being used steers like a battleship!
I see that our cross member design that we have been using for over a year and a half has been copied
We are continually working on fine tuning our system and there is alot of engineering that has gone into it and there have been some good suggestions from some customers that are helping to make it an even better system. Thanks for looking at our system and if you have any questions let me know.
www.randallsrack.com
 
T

TheAnswerMan

New Member
Dec 17, 2003
18
0
0
Dec 17, 2003
#12
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #12
Randall,

None of the pictures on your site show up. They all lead to bad links.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 18, 2003
#13
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #13
TheAnswerMan said:
Randall,

None of the pictures on your site show up. They all lead to bad links.
Click to expand...
Confirmed.
 
R

randallsrack.co

New Member
Apr 10, 2003
25
0
0
Dec 19, 2003
#14
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #14
Thanks for the heads up on the web site

I am not sure whats going on. I will contact my web guy. Hacked maybe?
 
R

randallsrack.co

New Member
Apr 10, 2003
25
0
0
Dec 19, 2003
#15
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #15
Looks like the pictures were pooched."We will rebuild it". Thanks. Randall
 
D

daveoxide

New Member
Dec 12, 2003
15
0
1
Davis, CA
Dec 20, 2003
#16
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #16
Randall, I commend you on your excellent work with designing a rack and pinion system for these old Mules , and I speak from experience!

I really like the mounting bracket you made to attach the rack to the frame rails. I may have to try something similar with my Taurus rack (when I have the time that is....).

You have made a very affordable and overall great kit (from what I have seen in pictures) for those that don't want the "top of the line" rack and pinion system. It is nice to see an alternative for those that don't have money trees growing in their yard .

I admire your work and I hope you keep designing affordable racks for years to come!
 

Cloudbuster

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
12
0
0
Middle TN
Feb 29, 2004
#17
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #17
Well, I finished my power rack and pinion conversion from Randalls Rack a few weeks ago, and have put a little over 200 miles on my car since. I must say, I am very happy with it so far. The car handles great, and it is much more fun to drive now, especially at highway speeds!
I put some pictures of the installation on my website if anyone wants to check them out. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/CloudBuster
Feel free to email me if you guys have any questions.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 29, 2004
#18
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #18
hey cloudbuster thanks for the update, i'm glad you like the system, might make my decision a bit easier, thanks again, and when you get some more pics be sure and let us know
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
51
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
T
A/C Compressor Reliability with Supercharger Setup – Need Advice
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 29, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
156
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 29, 2025
Noobz347
T
Progress Thread 2002 Mustang 3.8L CV
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • May 26, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
47
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
303
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
633
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?