• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Rate your Rockers. I need recomendations.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90mustangGT
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 20, 2004
#21
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #21
aaros said:
the guy at summit told me that the pro-mags were different than stock and i would have to buy another kit to make them work.
Click to expand...

So, there is an adapter kit??? I hope so because I want to get them and when I do get different heads down the road I won't have to change again.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Dec 20, 2004
#22
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #22
aaros said:
the guy at summit told me that the pro-mags were different than stock and i would have to buy another kit to make them work.
Click to expand...

The Pro Magnums may only be available for stud mount heads. Stock heads use pedestal mount rockers.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 20, 2004
#23
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #23
Yes you can get a special set of studs to convert a ped mount head, and use the Pro-Comps.

Only thing I do not like about the Pro-Comps is they were a little on the heavy side.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Dec 20, 2004
#24
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #24
Rick 91GT said:
Yes you can get a special set of studs to convert a ped mount head, and use the Pro-Comps.

Only thing I do not like about the Pro-Comps is they were a little on the heavy side.
Click to expand...

They're lighter at the valve than any aluminum rocker.....and thats the only place the weight makes any difference right?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 20, 2004
#25
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #25
maverick0716 said:
They're lighter at the valve than any aluminum rocker.....and thats the only place the weight makes any difference right?
Click to expand...


HMMM....maybe what I thought was a Pro Comp was not these were heavy stainless steel pieces, over the valve solid. I may be mistaken...
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Dec 20, 2004
#26
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #26
Rick 91GT said:
HMMM....maybe what I thought was a Pro Comp was not these were heavy stainless steel pieces, over the valve solid. I may be mistaken...
Click to expand...

These here

http://store.summitracing.com/defau...&N=100&Ntk=PartSearch&Ntt=cca-1331-16&x=5&y=5
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Pushrod Length?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
357
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
limp
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
899
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
B
SN95 New Heads
  • Blakeknight
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
962
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2025
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?