• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Re: The crashed mustang in S Carolina

  • Thread starter Thread starter RogerC62
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
R

runawayabc123

Member
Mar 9, 2007
192
0
16
Wisconsin
Oct 2, 2007
#21
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #21
What about fastbacks with the trap door? Does that count as a wall? Or at least better than the back seat?
 

JDS68Stang

New Member
Sep 3, 2007
153
1
0
New York State
Oct 2, 2007
#22
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #22
Tim65GT said:
A steel trunk divider may have saved her life. It's one of the first things I put in mine along with 3 pt seatbelts, better seats and power dual master cylinder. The brighter tail lights I added to let people at night, who may not be not paying attention (drunks) see the car sooner.

Got my steel trunk divider here:

http://www.americanpony.com/store.mv?p=802007-09-198-199




Installed:

Click to expand...


Thanks for posting the pics, I now have a use for a sheet of steel I had laying around wondering what to do with. Man I never thought about something like this happening but it's a possible reality everyday on the road.
I think that fire extinguisher as well that's been shoved around in my pantry is going into the stang as well. No way in hell anybody should have to die like that, I really feel for that woman and her family after seeing those pics.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Oct 3, 2007
#23
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #23
bnickel said:
that just reminds me of the old ford and chevy pickups with the gas tank behind the seat....no thanks.
Click to expand...

Here are my rolling death traps:





NOTE: It is sad about the driver of the Mustang and I feel sorry for her family. Perhaps the situation was avoidable, or perhaps not. When your time is up, you will not be able to cheat death.

For the record, I have been rear-ended hard in a 66' Mustang and I know that there are risks involved. You have to be able to accept a certain amount of risk if you are going to drive a vehicle that does not have modern safety features.
 

Attachments

  • Truckcartrailer3.webp
    94.3 KB · Views: 110
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 3, 2007
#24
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #24
nice pair. the 67-72 chevy trucks are among my favorite trucks, in fact as far as full size trucks go they are in my top 2 with 64-66 Fords being top dog.
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Oct 7, 2007
#25
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #25
dennis112 said:
Here are my rolling death traps:





NOTE: It is sad about the driver of the Mustang and I feel sorry for her family. Perhaps the situation was avoidable, or perhaps not. When your time is up, you will not be able to cheat death.

For the record, I have been rear-ended hard in a 66' Mustang and I know that there are risks involved. You have to be able to accept a certain amount of risk if you are going to drive a vehicle that does not have modern safety features.
Click to expand...

I agree with what your statement about risk but my big problem with what Ford did during the 60's and 70's with the Mustang, Falcon, Maverick, Comet, Cougar and Mustant-II and Pinto gas tanks was they KNEW what would happen as evidenced by the memo on the Pinto tanks. Now you can talk all day about cost and risk and weight differentials but in 1979 my father and mother-in-law had a 1978 Civic that weighed about 1800 lbs. While crossing the Ashley river bridge into Charleston they were hit in the rear by a full size early 70's GM car that was traveling about 50mph faster than they were going. The impact flipped the Honda, crushed the rear, broke the seat back on both front seats and drove the Honda about 1/3 the length of the bridge (I'd guess that is 200 ft) and the car came to rest just before the Charleston end. The Civic din't loose 1 drop of gas.
If Honda could build the Civic to do that why could Ford not do the same with the Pinto?
Answer....they could make more money (in the short term)the way they built it.
They don't seem to realize what M-B came to understand more than 50 years ago and that is when one of your customers dies in a car crash, you forever lose that customer. I remember the M-B add a few years back that showed in slow motion a M-B in rollover test. The only audio was this

"While this type crash accounts for fewer than x% of all crashes 100% of Mercedes-Benz automobiles are designed to survive it."

If a $32,000.00 M-B can do that why can ALL other $32,000.00 cars do the same?

And I'm not posting this to start another flame war. I will call any car manufacturer on any sub standard thing they do. It's just how I am.
Anybody want to talk about the Vega engines and body rust? Or the BMW v-12 and v-8 fiascos? Or Toyotas cooking the oil?
 

Attachments

  • Truckcartrailer3.webp
    94.3 KB · Views: 115
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Oct 7, 2007
#26
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #26
We all want to be as safe as possible but you can't prevent everything. Most of us know that the early Mustangs can explode but how many have really done it? At one time there were millions of early Mustangs on the road (a time which I lived through) and I never did know of anyone that had one explode. I know that it happened but I don't think it happened that often. The first one I heard about exploding was about ten years ago.

I'm sure that there have been a lot of people killed while driving or riding in a Ford Taurus simply because there are so many of them on the road. I've owned one, been through two collisions in it but I think that they are a very safe car.

That being said I still think we should make our Mustangs as safe as possible.
 

MontereyDave

New Member
Jul 29, 2006
0
0
0
Monterey, CA
Oct 7, 2007
#27
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #27
dennis112 said:
Here are my rolling death traps:





NOTE: It is sad about the driver of the Mustang and I feel sorry for her family. Perhaps the situation was avoidable, or perhaps not. When your time is up, you will not be able to cheat death.

For the record, I have been rear-ended hard in a 66' Mustang and I know that there are risks involved. You have to be able to accept a certain amount of risk if you are going to drive a vehicle that does not have modern safety features.
Click to expand...

I realize it is off topic but I just wanted to say that is a beautiful combination - SWB Chevy pickup pulling a 66 Stang I think it is especially cool how you pull a Ford with a Chevy but do you catch flack from both Ford and Chevy owners? You know the whole little boy Calvin piss on the other automaker' rivalry?
 

Attachments

  • Truckcartrailer3.webp
    94.3 KB · Views: 107

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Oct 7, 2007
#28
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #28
When my restoration was less than 2 years old (back in '98), I was stopped about 3 cars back at a red light. The guy coming up on my bumper was flirting with the woman in the next lane over. The light turned green, and she had no one in front of her, so she sped up. You guessed it, the idiot behind me continued to flirt and sped up too... right into my rear bumper. Fortunately he had been slowing down long enough that he wasn't able to do too much damage. I watch my rear view mirrors all the time, but you can't always avoid someone doing something stupid.

I actually have a Fuel Safe fuel cell, I just haven't taken the time to install it. I guess this is a little reminder from above.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 7, 2007
#29
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #29
one thing i have pondered is building a new tank for my 64 falcon and my 66 mustang, and putting them where the stock crossflow muffler sits, and then building a new trunk area much like the 79-91 crown vics. that would give you a deeper trunk, though still about the same amount of trunk space, and it puts the tank under the car and away from the rear bumper. i havent figured the whole system out just yet, but i am still pondering the change.
 

phast69

New Member
Jul 31, 2002
58
0
0
Arcola, IL
Oct 7, 2007
#30
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #30
I've got the rear firewall installed in my '69 coupe. Williams Welding and Street Rods installed mine and fabbed the whole thing up.
 

jlangholzj

Mustang Master
Oct 23, 2006
248
31
93
MI
Oct 7, 2007
#31
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #31
just outof curiosity, i wonder if you could take a check valve off of a newer vehicle and fabricate it behind the original fill (about 1/4 ") and instead of a rubber hose, bend a tube and wled it in place.

granted, you will have to drain and air out the tank, but this could add some sefety to the whole thing
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Oct 7, 2007
#32
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #32
rbohm said:
one thing i have pondered is building a new tank for my 64 falcon and my 66 mustang, and putting them where the stock crossflow muffler sits, and then building a new trunk area much like the 79-91 crown vics. that would give you a deeper trunk, though still about the same amount of trunk space, and it puts the tank under the car and away from the rear bumper. i havent figured the whole system out just yet, but i am still pondering the change.
Click to expand...

Ummmmm...... There's a problem with that idea as well! Google up "Crown Victoria"+fuel+fire to read about Law Enforcement agencies and cops' families going after Ford when some idiot rear-ends a parked police cruiser at about 60-70 MPH. The gas tank slams into the differential and comes apart; gas fumes float around; Crown Vic burns down. The idiot driver's insurance won't cover this issue, rather palm it off on the manufacturer of the cop car. Grab your lawyer, Ford's gonna make us rich.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Oct 8, 2007
#33
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #33
MontereyDave said:
I realize it is off topic but I just wanted to say that is a beautiful combination - SWB Chevy pickup pulling a 66 Stang I think it is especially cool how you pull a Ford with a Chevy but do you catch flack from both Ford and Chevy owners? You know the whole little boy Calvin piss on the other automaker' rivalry?
Click to expand...

Thank you for the kind comments. Yes, I do get comments but generally let the person know that I appreciate all "60's" vehicles, be it AMC, Ford, GM, Mopar, and even performance imports. I think they all are cool!

Here are a couple more pics of the GMC:

http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n229/dennis_8047/GMC/GMC_LH.jpg

http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n229/dennis_8047/GMC/GMC_RH.jpg
 

Iamdiffrnt

Member
Nov 13, 2005
197
6
19
South of Detroit, MI
Oct 8, 2007
#34
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #34
The way I understand it, Ford put a stop to many of those lawsuits. The way I heard it, if a government office was suing Ford for a burn down from a high speed collision into one of their crown vics, ford wouldn't sell them any more until they dropped the suit. Since the crown vic is still the safest vehicle for the purpose, the vast majority of the suits got dropped.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 8, 2007
#35
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #35
StangDreamin' said:
Ummmmm...... There's a problem with that idea as well! Google up "Crown Victoria"+fuel+fire to read about Law Enforcement agencies and cops' families going after Ford when some idiot rear-ends a parked police cruiser at about 60-70 MPH. The gas tank slams into the differential and comes apart; gas fumes float around; Crown Vic burns down. The idiot driver's insurance won't cover this issue, rather palm it off on the manufacturer of the cop car. Grab your lawyer, Ford's gonna make us rich.
Click to expand...

i recognize that issue. the problem is the design of the stock tank, as it is thin sheet metal with no internal liner. i was thinking of thicker metal than 22 gauge, more like 16 gauge, and using an internal bladder. i also plan on using bracing around the area, in part to stiffen up that area to compensate for the loss of the shear effect of the stock tank.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 8, 2007
#36
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #36
rbohm said:
i recognize that issue. the problem is the design of the stock tank, as it is thin sheet metal with no internal liner. i was thinking of thicker metal than 22 gauge, more like 16 gauge, and using an internal bladder. i also plan on using bracing around the area, in part to stiffen up that area to compensate for the loss of the shear effect of the stock tank.
Click to expand...

i think if someone made a stock mustang tank with an internal bladder that would be big plus, i would prefer something like that. at one point there was a company making them, they took a stock tank and added a bladder before assembly. i don't think they are still around though because i haven't been able to find the website in a very long time.
 

mfp4073

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
387
0
38
Hells Ditch, FL
Oct 9, 2007
#37
  • Oct 9, 2007
  • #37
Just a note, if you install the hole between the rear seats and trunk, you also need to do the top package tray holes or you have not done much.

I can personally attest to the damage in the accident has got to be a pretty solid hit. Look at the front damage on the mustang.

This is what my car looked like after a 20MPH rear end that I did.



the mustang had to have hit the car in front of it harder than that with the front damage. To take a stopped mustang and push it several feet forward and do that much damage......that had to have been a really hard hit. heck, it turned the mustang like 140 degrees from what it looked like.

Could have easily broken the neck of the driver so she could not move to get out.
 

Attachments

  • tt3.webp
    9 KB · Views: 119
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 9, 2007
#38
  • Oct 9, 2007
  • #38
mfp4073 said:
Just a note, if you install the hole between the rear seats and trunk, you also need to do the top package tray holes or you have not done much.

I can personally attest to the damage in the accident has got to be a pretty solid hit. Look at the front damage on the mustang.

This is what my car looked like after a 20MPH rear end that I did.



the mustang had to have hit the car in front of it harder than that with the front damage. To take a stopped mustang and push it several feet forward and do that much damage......that had to have been a really hard hit. heck, it turned the mustang like 140 degrees from what it looked like.

Could have easily broken the neck of the driver so she could not move to get out.
Click to expand...

i agree 100%, had to have been an extremely hard hit and also it looks like both cars submarined quite a bit as well which make it even more likely to damage the tank on the stang or even rip a fuel line on the taurus too. would also be more likely to create serious injury to the driver of the stang.


PS, MFP4073 are you going to paint your car yellow with red and blue stripes on the bottom? maybe have the "the big bopper" paint on one side and Max on the other? does anyone ever get your username?
 

Attachments

  • tt3.webp
    9 KB · Views: 116

mfp4073

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
387
0
38
Hells Ditch, FL
Oct 10, 2007
#39
  • Oct 10, 2007
  • #39
not usually, but a few! I have thought about doing some getto replicas for years. Figured a 4 door maverick would work great for the yellow xbs, and a torino would do a pretty good job at making an xb interceptor!
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Oct 10, 2007
#40
  • Oct 10, 2007
  • #40
There's a guy here at work that used to drive a yellow xbs look-a-like. I haven't seen it in a while though.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Replacement valve springs and retainers
  • hollywoodstang
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 18, 2009
hollywoodstang
F
few pics from tonight
  • flyboy86
  • Apr 14, 2008
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2008
flyboy86
F
F
wiring a boost gauge and a/f ratio gauge
  • flyboy86
  • Apr 15, 2008
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 18, 2008
Hoboattacker
H
F
KB 2.6, 2005 GT throwing belts, HELP!!!!!!
  • flyboy86
  • May 1, 2008
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 11, 2008
flyboy86
F
S197 Line Lock Installation Write-Up
  • DarkFireGT
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Feb 28, 2008
MikeysOTP
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?