• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Real diff between A9L and A9P???

  • Thread starter Thread starter 71vert-pga
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 1, 2004
#21
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #21
Here is a peak at the two timing tables pulled from the TwEECer website bin files for both computers........
 
T

tim_the_toolman

Founding Member
Nov 30, 2001
1,317
0
36
Nashville TN
Sep 1, 2004
#22
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #22
Speed_Demon1965 said:
An automatic tranny can not use a manual computer (A9L). The computer has none of the programs it takes for the tranny. I don't think the AOD is fully electronic, but I'm sure something is electronic in them.

The reason an automatic computer (A9P) can be used with a manual tranny is because the manual tranny only needs a vehicle speed sensor to work, nothing else. Which the A9P already has a program to read the VSS.

Actually, I think this whole "automatic vs manual computer" thing is alot more serious on 94-95s because the auto is FULLY electronic.
Click to expand...


This is correct. According to the Ford Fuel Injection Handbook the pinout for the 5 speed computer and the auto computer are slightly different. If you use a 5 speed comp in a auto the voltage that goes through one of the pins backfeeds and frys the ecu. The auto computer works in the 5 speed because the pinout deadends.
 
7

71vert-pga

New Member
Dec 18, 2003
145
0
0
Bell Chasse, LA
Sep 1, 2004
#23
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #23
tim_the_toolman said:
This is correct. According to the Ford Fuel Injection Handbook the pinout for the 5 speed computer and the auto computer are slightly different. If you use a 5 speed comp in a auto the voltage that goes through one of the pins backfeeds and frys the ecu. The auto computer works in the 5 speed because the pinout deadends.
Click to expand...


Casey4093,

Did you have to change a pin or something?
 

Thomas302

Member
Jan 9, 2004
119
0
16
Alamogordo, NM
Sep 1, 2004
#24
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #24
My friend put an A9P computer in his 5 speed car, and the only difference we saw was there was no 6250 rev limiter. Other then that, we noticed no difference at the the track or on the street. Hope that helped.
 
D

dmay

New Member
Jul 22, 2003
5
0
0
Sep 4, 2004
#25
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #25
tmoss said:
Here is a peak at the two timing tables pulled from the TwEECer website bin files for both computers........
Click to expand...


Tom,
that looks like an altitude chart for the A9L vs. a base chart for the A9P.


So how close are you to buying a twEECer?

I downloaded everything except the binaries from Tweecers download page(I did download the DA1 binary) and messed with it some last night,now I'm in the market for a cheap laptop

The speed density (you have to select DA1 at the bottom of the screen on the alpha release version) stuff is not quite as user friendly as the A9L,
plus no signifigant support in the forums,have to go it alone.SD guys are kinda used to that though
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 4, 2004
#26
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #26
Yeah, I missed that when I lifted the screens. I'll check the base of the A9L and see if it differs significantly. Not that close to buying one yet. I wanna dyno a second time and see where I'm at at least once, maybe twice after rough tuning with fuel and total timing. It sure would be nice to be able to build a custom spark curve, but $500+ for the provelage is a little steep if I'm running good and making 270 or more RWHP.
 
D

dmay

New Member
Jul 22, 2003
5
0
0
Sep 4, 2004
#27
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #27
The A9L binary I downloaded if funky,base timing is all over the place,just figured I didn't know what the hell I was looking at
When I bought my 87 it had an old Superchips module between the harness and the ecu,I tried tuning without it by adjusting f/p and timing,I couldn't get near the excellent drivabilty (better part throttle response)as with it installed,so back in it went.
You can look at it and see which circuits the module intercepts, act,ect,tps,egr solenoid,spout,and maybe some others.One of these days I'll get around to hooking up two breakout boxes before and after the module and see just how it alters each signal.
I want a tweecer because I want to build another car in the near future,maybe a 347 or even a 393,with the tweecer it looks like just a matter of entering engine displacement and changing the injector slopes(injector sizes).
even with a mild speed density cam a 393 should be a brute.
And who knows,maybe I'm just the one who will figure out how to get SD to be tolerant of long duration cams( )
 

SLOW 97

Founding Member
May 10, 2002
667
0
0
Arlington Heights,IL
Sep 4, 2004
#28
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #28
The computer needs a signal from the PRNDL switch to know how to adjust idle depending on what range you are in. If you ran a Manual computer w/ an auto, the engine would most likely stall when you put it in gear because it can't compentsate for the extra load. As said though, you can run an A9P w/ a stick with no problems.
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Sep 4, 2004
#29
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #29
I just put an A9P into my 5spd 87GT with a MAF conversion, and I have had no problems. My mechanic told me the A9p is the better one to get because it has a better timing setup, and it adds slightly more fuel because it's setup for the loads an auto puts on the car. I don't know what of that is true, but my car runs fine with it.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Sep 4, 2004
#30
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #30
I don't see a Base Timing Table for the A9L in my TwEECer program
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Sep 4, 2004
#31
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #31
astronut1885 said:
I just put an A9P into my 5spd 87GT with a MAF conversion, and I have had no problems. My mechanic told me the A9p is the better one to get because it has a better timing setup, and it adds slightly more fuel because it's setup for the loads an auto puts on the car. I don't know what of that is true, but my car runs fine with it.
Click to expand...

Actually the fuel tables are the same for the most part. Except under low amounts of load where the A9P is leaner than the A9L. There are many differences between the two. The A9P just seems more conservative.

Up top is the A9P and below that is the A9L.

 
D

dmay

New Member
Jul 22, 2003
5
0
0
Sep 4, 2004
#32
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #32
BlackFox5.0 said:
I don't see a Base Timing Table for the A9L in my TwEECer program
Click to expand...

possibly spark table-sea level?

I just downloaded from the website,I don't know if what I downloaded was the version you get when you buy a tweecer.
I just wanted an idea what the software looked like.

what I downloaded won't start calcon,says"invalid variant type conversion"
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Sep 4, 2004
#33
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #33
Venom4.6 said:
In my first post, I was just quoting what I have read in my Mustang Technical Reference Book and also what I have been told. The book was written by Ford so I'm going by that.
Click to expand...

Ford also says to lift your foot from the accelerator pedal prior to disengaging the clutch when changing gears in a manual transmission. Yeah, right
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 5, 2004
#34
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #34
dmay said:
possibly spark table-sea level?

I just downloaded from the website,I don't know if what I downloaded was the version you get when you buy a tweecer.
I just wanted an idea what the software looked like.

what I downloaded won't start calcon,says"invalid variant type conversion"
Click to expand...

Did you download Borland First?
 
D

dmay

New Member
Jul 22, 2003
5
0
0
Sep 6, 2004
#35
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #35
tmoss said:
Did you download Borland First?
Click to expand...


Yep, i did finally get it to open w/o the error,but I would likely want to speak directly with Mike Glover before I bought a tweecer.

The issue right now is that my car runs great as is, I don't intend to modify it any further.Unless I buy another 5.0 I don't really need it so it's hard to justify spending the money right now as I would need to buy a laptop also.
I need to finish my other projects before starting any others,right after I finish typing this I'm going out to the garage to start welding the rollcage in this:

My Mercedes Unimog rockcrawler,and my pickup is old and tired,it's gonna need to tow the Mog on a trailer (the trailer I haven't bought yet)so I better get it fixed up,and my house is 180 freakin' years old,need to do some work on it also. Tweecer is low on priority list I guess
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 6, 2004
#36
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #36
My car runs great too, and that's the reason I haven't been in a rush to buy the TwEECer. I'm gonna dyno once or twice more after doing rough timing/fuel adjustments.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Sep 6, 2004
#37
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #37
My car would not idle, and had kind of a surging under part throttle. I was able to fix all of this with TwEECer. I need it for my car to run properly. The only down side to TwEECer is that there is no said instruction manual, or how-to on how to tune with it and such. It's all on the TwEECer forums. The community is huge. There is a lot of info there as well on the members pages. I would also suggest that you get a notebook and takes notes, because it's hard to rememeber what everything does. I take note on the computer and save them, but thats not the safest way should they get lost...

All in all, even with the lack of a manual, the TwEECer was definately worth it to me. And if oyu get one get the R/T model, which has the datalogging. It goes hand in hand with programming. Without it it's not much help.
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Sep 6, 2004
#38
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #38
Chris' car won't run without the tweecer because it's a POS lol. It's a bandaid. "Want a bandaid chris?, How 'bout a lolipop?"
In all honesty, I think the Tweecer is a great tool, especially for modded motors. It helps you get the computer to jive with stuff it wasn't built for, and also helps wring the best performance out of the car. I will be getting one soon after my supercharger.
 
T

tim_the_toolman

Founding Member
Nov 30, 2001
1,317
0
36
Nashville TN
Sep 7, 2004
#39
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #39
71vert-pga said:
Casey4093,

Did you have to change a pin or something?
Click to expand...


No you can simply use the AOD computer in a 5 speed but not visa versa
 

j753303

Active Member
Aug 25, 2020
73
28
28
MASS
Aug 25, 2020
#40
  • Aug 25, 2020
  • #40
isn't the pin out different for the o2 sensor harness? I heard you have to match the o2 harness to the computer or you could fry the ecu
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
117
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
A
Help with engine issues/emissions
  • Artyom
  • Apr 11, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 12, 2024
Mindseye007
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
*New guy* Microsquirt questions regarding required engine info.
  • jack.stand.racing
  • Sep 23, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
10
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Sep 24, 2020
jack.stand.racing
J
R
Electrical A9P in 5 speed, warm start probs
  • rocksolid
  • Apr 1, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 3, 2019
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?