• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo

Drivetrain Rear axle gears

  • Thread starter Thread starter Exrace89GT
  • Start date Start date Jun 16, 2020
E

Exrace89GT

Member
Mar 29, 2019
90
16
18
Lompoc, CA
Jun 16, 2020
#1
  • Jun 16, 2020
  • #1
What rear gear ratio. A little history. 89 GT, 306, stock cam, Explorer heads and manifold with egr and the air injection. Have to pass California smog check. T5 out of a 92 5.0. I want to go to 3:55 or 3:73. So which one is best for the street.
 

B.D. Magoo

Member
Jun 17, 2020
38
1
8
Chattanooga TN
Jun 17, 2020
#2
  • Jun 17, 2020
  • #2
I had the 5.0 out of a 98 exploder with a E cam in my 85/88 frankinmutt, stock gt40p engine except cam. I have a 8.8 rear end from a 93GT with 373 gear and a locker, went from 308 to the 373. Honestly when I 1st changed it I didn't like it, made drivability difficult for the drop in fuel mileage, top speed went waaay down, and 1st gear was almost useless, I would rather had the 355 gears instead to find a better medium. Now I have a little more engine and the 373 gears are great. My advice, look at your end plans not current situation and build accordingly. It might be a little much now but just what you want or need later.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Jun 22, 2020
#3
  • Jun 22, 2020
  • #3
B.D. Magoo said:
top speed went waaay down
Click to expand...
3.73's should be good for somewhere in the range of 160mph with a t5 transmission.
Down from somewhere around 190mph with 3.08's.
So while technically you could be right, your top speed is indeed down, i'm not so sure about how relevant those numbers are...
And typically the more "engine" you have, the less gear you need.

Exrace, either ratio is fine, the 3.73's are a bit more aggressive, but consider most people would not waste their time changing between the two.
So the reality is, you could go either way and be fine.
With that said, you will likely find the seasoned guys here suggest 3.55's.
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,807
904
143
Jun 22, 2020
#4
  • Jun 22, 2020
  • #4
The key question is what you want the car to do. If you are looking to cruise around, behave with speed limits and hit the occasional 100-110mph, I would go with the 3.55s. As stated above, higher numbers will virtually eliminate first gear or make you really good at 1st/2nd powershifts.

If you want to race top speed with vipers, vettes, ... you will need more power and something even lower (3.08/3.27). But if I remember right when they were new the published top speed of the Foxbody was 145 or 149. At that point you have aerodynamic drag to deal with if you want to go faster (not just gear ratio and RPM math as used above).
 
Reactions: Willybill32

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,875
10,544
203
polk county florida
Jun 22, 2020
#5
  • Jun 22, 2020
  • #5
Something rarely mentioned when talking rear gear ratio is tire height, a 373 with a stock height tire makes first gear pretty much useless for regular cruising, a 355 gear is a happy medium for stock or mildly modified street car.
 
Reactions: Willybill32

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
627
348
83
Lexington, KY
Jun 23, 2020
#6
  • Jun 23, 2020
  • #6
KRUISR said:
The key question is what you want the car to do. If you are looking to cruise around, behave with speed limits and hit the occasional 100-110mph, I would go with the 3.55s. As stated above, higher numbers will virtually eliminate first gear or make you really good at 1st/2nd powershifts.

If you want to race top speed with vipers, vettes, ... you will need more power and something even lower (3.08/3.27). But if I remember right when they were new the published top speed of the Foxbody was 145 or 149. At that point you have aerodynamic drag to deal with if you want to go faster (not just gear ratio and RPM math as used above).
Click to expand...

I replaced my stock 2.73 with 3.55 gearing. I don’t plan on racing or track time, but wanted a compromise between comfortable cruising and performance. No complaints so far.
 
Reactions: General karthief
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
321
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
281
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
G
Expired 2013 Ford Mustang V6 (Grabber Blue) 3:55 gears... Excellent Condition.
  • Grabberblueguy77
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
2
Views
447
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 11, 2026
Grabberblueguy77
G
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Friday at 5:34 PM
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
47
The Welcome Wagon Friday at 5:34 PM
5150K
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?