• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Rear end gear help

  • Thread starter Thread starter JonezySN95
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 12, 2011
#1
  • Aug 12, 2011
  • #1
So I finally got my mustang back up and running after my new heart transplant (motor swap). The problem I have now is that the guy I bought the car from swears the car is not geared, but the speedo reads 90mph when im only doing 75mph (gps confirmed). I also scored some 3.73's in a deal but im affraid it already has them... so how can I confirm this without pulling apart my whole rear end if I dont have to? Also the AODE has been acting a little funny. When I take off and it tries to shift to 2nd it falls on its face for a little bit (feels like forever) before it shifts real hard braking the wheels loose again in second. I figured the tranny was done but didnt really care cause im swapping to manual here soon anyways, but i was just looking through other threads and just read that if its geared and the comp hasn't been chipped or adjusted/tuned the shift points could be off by up to 20%. So is this the possible problem with my tranny?
 

Last5.0

Active Member
Nov 9, 2003
404
1
26
Aug 12, 2011
#2
  • Aug 12, 2011
  • #2
Put the rear up on stands, put in neutral and spin a tire and count the revolutions of the driveshaft. If you have 3.73 the driveshaft should turn 3 complete revolutions and 3/4 of another to each 1 revolution of the tire. 3.08's would be just over 3 revolutions, etc.
 

SableSal

Member
Sep 17, 2009
295
3
19
Fresno, Californ-I-A
Aug 12, 2011
#3
  • Aug 12, 2011
  • #3
I'd say easier, remove the cover, count the teeth. Unless you've changed that fluid recently then do the above stated.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Aug 12, 2011
#4
  • Aug 12, 2011
  • #4
SableSal said:
I'd say easier, remove the cover, count the teeth. Unless you've changed that fluid recently then do the above stated.
Click to expand...

Easier??

Since you need to jack up the rear to do both, it seems to me putting a mark on the D/S and counting the number of revolutions for one wheel rotation has to be not only easier but cleaner and quicker. Maybe 10 minutes.
 

SableSal

Member
Sep 17, 2009
295
3
19
Fresno, Californ-I-A
Aug 13, 2011
#5
  • Aug 13, 2011
  • #5
toyman said:
Easier??

Since you need to jack up the rear to do both, it seems to me putting a mark on the D/S and counting the number of revolutions for one wheel rotation has to be not only easier but cleaner and quicker. Maybe 10 minutes.
Click to expand...

Hah, yeah. Gear oil is stinky. But I would say it takes out the guessing.
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Aug 13, 2011
#6
  • Aug 13, 2011
  • #6
SableSal said:
Hah, yeah. Gear oil is stinky. But I would say it takes out the guessing.
Click to expand...

Yeah it's always nice to count the teeth, or better yet look at the model number on the side of the ring gear and google it! Mine had 4.10 right in the model number so it was easy, but I was in there already to replace a leaky axle seal.
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 13, 2011
#7
  • Aug 13, 2011
  • #7
Eh I'll try spinning the tires first, but I have not changed the oil yet and god knows when the last time was since it was serviced so I will just go that route. If I already have 3.73's in it (which by the sound of it i believe i do) then I will prob have some nice used 3.73's for sale here soon.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Aug 13, 2011
#8
  • Aug 13, 2011
  • #8
Counting the rotations of the drive shaft is NOT an approximation or a guess. It is just as accurate as counting teeth on the ring and pinion gears. It has to be as that is the exact same ratio between the ring gear and pinion. It may be true that you can't precisely count 3.73 turns it doesn't matter as the 2 next closest sizes are 3.55 and 3.90 and they can be counted just as accurately.
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 13, 2011
#9
  • Aug 13, 2011
  • #9
Well at least I now found a quick answer to what gears I may have, but I still hope its my computer being confused that is throwing the shift points off on my tranny. I am doing a 5 speed swap soon, but I would like to do it on terms when im ready and not be forced to do it early due to a pos tranny.
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Aug 14, 2011
#10
  • Aug 14, 2011
  • #10
The computer knows what gears you have in the rear end. The vehicle speed sensor (VSS) checks how fast the output shaft of the tranny is moving (and thus, the driveshaft). It does the math with the rear end gear ratio it has stored and displays the speed. A computer chip or a Speedcal will correct your speedometer
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Aug 14, 2011
#11
  • Aug 14, 2011
  • #11
I dunno about that Matt. I've riden in cars with AODE's after a gear swap and the car just goes nuts when it's time to shift. Bucking and backfiring like mad. The AODE 94/95 Mustang 5.0 should have never happened period! They are almost as bad as the Mustang II!!!
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Aug 14, 2011
#12
  • Aug 14, 2011
  • #12
I never had an issue with the 4:10 gears. Sure the shifts occurred earlier (at a slower speed) than before but that really didn't make any difference. With a recalibrator the speedo was reading true and knowing my actual speed was more important than the shift points. WOT shift can be problematic without a shift kit and running 4:10's. You may end up hitting the rev limit during the shift with an auto especially the 1-2 shift.At no time did I ever have a bucking or backfiring issue. Like Matt said the VSS signal isn't changed just the speedo reading.
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 18, 2011
#13
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #13
Then maybe my tranny is going out then? Im not worried about my speed reading so much cause I have a gps for safe measures anyway. It doesnt matter if it is bad or not right now anyway cause I have more issues with the motor at the moment. I just installed the new cam (TF stage 1). Now when I start the car it runs fine, but when I drive it and it warmes up it wont idle when I come to a stop. Also with the old cam (it was a flat tappet F cam) my oil pressure was around 50. Now with the new cam its at 40 and when it warmes up it it droppes to 25 (15 trying to idle). It had 2 codes 172 and 327 which I beleive are MAF and EGR.
 

five0xpres

New Member
Apr 2, 2008
17
0
1
North Carolina
Aug 18, 2011
#14
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #14
JonezySN95 said:
2 codes 172 and 327
Click to expand...

A code 172 for the EEC-IV is "HEGO (Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen) sensor - voltage signal indicated lean in Bank #1"

and a 327 is "EGR Valve Position (EVP) sensor, Pressure Feedback EGR (PFE) sensor or EGR Pressure Transducer (EPT) - signal voltage too low."
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 18, 2011
#15
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #15
five0xpres said:
A code 172 for the EEC-IV is "HEGO (Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen) sensor - voltage signal indicated lean in Bank #1"

and a 327 is "EGR Valve Position (EVP) sensor, Pressure Feedback EGR (PFE) sensor or EGR Pressure Transducer (EPT) - signal voltage too low."
Click to expand...

Thanks man! Hmm thats wierd because I was running rich before... I took out all the smog stuff (to include the EGR) so could that have anything to do with the 172 code? Obviously thats why its popping the 327 code...
 
B

BIGDATOWN

Member
Dec 3, 2010
115
0
16
Aug 18, 2011
#16
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #16
If you have a flat tappet F cam, you can be a millionare. The 95 motor is only a roller and so is a F cam.
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 18, 2011
#17
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #17
BIGDATOWN said:
If you have a flat tappet F cam, you can be a millionare. The 95 motor is only a roller and so is a F cam.
Click to expand...

Ok so it may not be an "F" cam... The guy I got the motor from only told me it had a 512 lift. Only knowing that and it being the old straight 302 firing order I just assumed it was an f cam. Yes it was a flat tappet setup because I just switched it over to a roller setup with a stage 1 TF. After days of wondering why my car wouldnt start and idle I finally found out it was a straight 302 cam (it was supposed to be a carb setup for a project). It would run on the old firing order, but obviously the comp was spraying the injectors at the 5.0 HO timing so therefor I put a different cam in it.
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Aug 18, 2011
#18
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #18
NotA4.6 said:
I dunno about that Matt. I've ridden in cars with AODE's after a gear swap and the car just goes nuts when it's time to shift. Bucking and backfiring like mad. The AODE 94/95 Mustang 5.0 should have never happened period! They are almost as bad as the Mustang II!!!
Click to expand...

It's been a while since I've had to deal with the speedometer gear and the VSS, so I redid my research. I was wrong, the computer does not hold a value recording the rear end gears; that's all handled with the VSS and the drive & driven gears in the tranny. What I used the computer chip for was to change the tranny gear ratios; I had 4R70W gears put in my AODE, so to fix the shift points I needed a chip. Good catch, Mark.

The computer does use the VSS to calculate when it needs to shift. With the inaccurate speedometer, the computer miscalculates and shifts 1st-to-2nd late. To correctly fix the speedometer and the odd shifting, you need to change both the plastic gear on the VSS and the drive gear inside the transmission. You can get close if you use a white 23-tooth gear for the VSS, but it's a Chrysler part and it doesn't mesh very well with the Ford drive gear in the transmission. It will eventually tear itself apart. But if you're going to do the manual tranny swap soon, the white 23-tooth gear might not be a bad short-term solution.
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 18, 2011
#19
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #19
Chythar said:
The computer does use the VSS to calculate when it needs to shift. With the inaccurate speedometer, the computer miscalculates and shifts 1st-to-2nd late. To correctly fix the speedometer and the odd shifting, you need to change both the plastic gear on the VSS and the drive gear inside the transmission. You can get close if you use a white 23-tooth gear for the VSS, but it's a Chrysler part and it doesn't mesh very well with the Ford drive gear in the transmission. It will eventually tear itself apart. But if you're going to do the manual tranny swap soon, the white 23-tooth gear might not be a bad short-term solution.
Click to expand...

Ok thanks for the info. It sounds like a good temp fix to get me by... now just to find a decent priced tranny and hardware to do the swap. I slept on a couple offers already thinking I would get one at the local junk yard (they said they had 2 at a pick-n-pull) umm yeaa when I got there they were stripped so I lost out on multiple good deals
 

alleymad95GT

Member
Jul 14, 2009
204
0
16
Okemos, Michigan
Aug 19, 2011
#20
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #20
You can change it electronically as well I think...

Ford Racing Mustang Speedometer Recalibration Tool (94-10) at AmericanMuscle.com - Free Shipping!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Newbie looking for some info on speedo gears
  • TDM389
  • Nov 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
222
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2025
TDM389
T
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
391
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
426
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 18, 2026
TPony
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
525
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Y
Brakes Sn95 Rear end swap
  • Ybfav84
  • Dec 1, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
546
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 3, 2024
85GTStangGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?