• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rear leaf spring moving

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang67Coupe
  • Start date Start date Mar 10, 2004
M

Mustang67Coupe

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
64
0
0
Salem, Or
Mar 10, 2004
#1
  • Mar 10, 2004
  • #1
Rear leaf spring moving, fuel cell, bunch of q's

Hey guys, was wondering if theres anyway to switch the leaf springs to the other side of the frame rails, and then making a breaket for the back pivot point... Dont know if this has ever been done or not but im trying to get alittle more room back there, and doing alittle tubbin as well.

Will this effect handling majorly? or weaken anything much?

And is there a cheap route (as in money not quality) to modify the springs to allow for more room?

Thanks in advance guys!
 

crushnut

New Member
Apr 27, 2003
870
0
0
Oregon
Mar 10, 2004
#2
  • Mar 10, 2004
  • #2
Try these guys: http://www.critesrestoration.com/

Ive been told they make a spring relocation kit for early falcons. Not sure if it would work for early mustangs too, or they may even have a kit for early mustangs. Its worth a shot to give them a call or email to find out more.

Good Luck
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Mar 10, 2004
#3
  • Mar 10, 2004
  • #3
Honestly, I dont see how you could possibly move the leaf springs in on our cars. The front Eyes might not be a problem...The rear passenger side may not be a problem...but I know on the drivers side it is TIGHT TIGHT TIGHT where the rear eye bolts to the shackle
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Mar 10, 2004
#4
  • Mar 10, 2004
  • #4
I don't see a simple bracket fabrication having enough strength to support that mod, especially under a racing load, which I'm guessing is why you're talking about tubbing.
You can move the frame rails, but its not a job to be done on the cheap. You'll also run right into the fuel tank, requiring the purchase of a fuel cell.

You gotta pay to play with the big dogs, if you don't have deep pockets, its better to stay on the porch with the little dogs.
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Mar 10, 2004
#5
  • Mar 10, 2004
  • #5
Well, it just so happens that we have just finished doing this! Basically new rear rails were made, as well as crossmembers. My '66 will be running a 331 stroker with 12-16 # boost via a Kenne Bell blower, and I don't want to simply set the world's burnout record! To fit 10-12" of rear tread requires some room. Currently a 9" rear end is being cut down...gotta measure for custom axles and wheels.

When I get a chance, I'll post a couple of pictures of the fabrication. We had hoped to finish this car in time for Nashville, but it is NOT going to happen! Oh well...I guess that is the nature of these projects!
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Mar 10, 2004
#6
  • Mar 10, 2004
  • #6
You will have to do a bit fabrication to make it work. The mustang torque boxes are kind of fragile when not used as originally designed so I am not sure if reloacting the leaf spring is going to be that easy or cheap.
Kevin
 

crushnut

New Member
Apr 27, 2003
870
0
0
Oregon
Mar 10, 2004
#7
  • Mar 10, 2004
  • #7
It will be neither.

GaPonyFarm said:
You gotta pay to play with the big dogs, if you don't have deep pockets, its better to stay on the porch with the little dogs.
Click to expand...

Well said, and true
 
M

Mustang67Coupe

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
64
0
0
Salem, Or
Mar 11, 2004
#8
  • Mar 11, 2004
  • #8
alright thanks guys for the info so far, i went out trying to make a design to make it work however it seemed near impossible without moding the rear valance and doing some mods to the gas tank. Ive decided if i ever go it i will most likely go with a fuel cell making the job much much easier to fab. Atleast it seems this way.

My idea was to run a cross member out of 3/8x2 1/2x3 from each rail in the back, then add two small blocks 3/8x2 1/2x3 steel extending down from the crossmember with a 2 inch hole (with two inch piping inserted in) for the top pivot point in the rear mounting of the leaf spring. The arms from the top pivot to the bottom pivot would have to be shortened. Then i would fab a braket for the from leaf spring mount still designing that.

So now my questions are if the leaf springs are moved in about 5 1/2 inches inward im estimating will the ride and handling suffer? I was thinking it may have alittle more body roll to it and a stiff spring may be needed.

Also anyone got a estimated cost of what it takes for a 16 gal fuel cell conversion im thinking 250 so far, but havent been through the experience like some of you.

I know its hard to understand what i was taling about in the design of the crossmember, ill try and make a few sketches, It will also involve some cutting of the current place where the fuel tank sits. Any concerns or comments are very welcome, Thanks Guys!
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Mar 11, 2004
#9
  • Mar 11, 2004
  • #9
Anything is possible with the right amount of time and money. I dont see this 'conversion' costing any less than $2500 minimum. I may be off, i dont know. As for body roll...if you are tubbing your car in this manner, why are you even worried about it?
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Mar 11, 2004
#10
  • Mar 11, 2004
  • #10
A bit more information

On my '66 'vert, we have 3 crossmembers: one at the front spring mount, one at the rear spring mounts, and one at the area where the trunk tilts upward (if that makes sense). It is constructed from 2 x 3 tubing. Today my fabricator realized that it will take a bit of notching in the center member to clear the diff (9"). He has also added some other structural bracing, including very thick panel on the inside of the "new" wheel well. I will get some pictures and post over the weekend.

I am going to install the 20 gal fuel cell from Summit. If you look at the ridiculous prices for "mustang" fuel cells (drop in gas tank replacement), the $800 saved goes a LOOONNNNGGGG way on fabrication expense!

As for the handling, we shall see. This car is going to be a total mutant anyway, with R & C tubular/coilover "MII-style" front suspension w/ rack & pinion...and with 600-700 hp, a real handful! Just depressed it is not going to be ready for Nashville next month!

Also, Martz chassis has a nice looking rear suspension unit w/ coilovers. Cost is not bad (1250 IIRC), plus labor. Probably better for corner carving than my setup...considering it for my 2+2 once this is completed and my funds are replenished.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
628
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
SOLD Restored 1986 Mustang GT
  • MRaburn
  • Jul 12, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
7
Views
9K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jul 12, 2022
Noobz347
Fox rear coil-over vs. traditional spring opinions
  • Waz900
  • Mar 5, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2020
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?