• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rear Leaf Springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carizzma
  • Start date Start date Aug 2, 2004
C

Carizzma

New Member
May 23, 2004
11
0
0
Aug 2, 2004
#1
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #1
Anybody using the rear leaf springs by Year One that are dsigned to control wheel hop without the use of traction bars?
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Aug 2, 2004
#2
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #2
Maier Racing also develops these springs. They are a 4 1/2 leaf spring rated at 160lbs. and have an extra 1/2 leaf at the rear of the spring to control axle wind-up and the hop.

Link: http://www.maierracing.com/
 

Attachments

  • large1pnms2307.webp
    3.5 KB · Views: 551

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Aug 2, 2004
#3
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #3
No problem with wheel hop unless you approach the 350 to 400 horsepower area if you use the standard 4 1/2 leaf spring.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Aug 2, 2004
#4
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #4
Looking at my previous post... I believe the extra leaf is towards the front, not the rear of the leafspring. Maier states this takes the place of the need for an under-ride traction bar.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Aug 3, 2004
#5
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #5
Yeh, I was about to blast you about being incorrect too, you're lucky you corrected yourself.

Those that are interested/have thought about it, do you see any real benefit of traction bars and standard type leafs against the above offset leafs?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Aug 3, 2004
#6
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #6
Route666 said:
Yeh, I was about to blast you about being incorrect too, you're lucky you corrected yourself.

Those that are interested/have thought about it, do you see any real benefit of traction bars and standard type leafs against the above offset leafs?
Click to expand...
Well, this style of leaf would affect how the spring bends under normal loads, IMO. A traction bar would only act to prevent wrap-up under hard acceleration. I'm guessing here, but wondering whether the motion of the axle during jounce would be changed. I see the front, stiff part of the leaf creating more movement of the axle in a front/rearward direction. Could this exaggerate any rear-steer tendencies of the car? I don't know, but that would be my first concern.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Aug 3, 2004
#7
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #7
Yes, it would tend to move the axle back as the suspension compresses.

I don't have that much faith in its ability to control wheel hop either. While the front will be stiff, the rear is a fair bit less still, so it still has the propensity to flex a lot. I suppose the rear half flexing is still limited by the front though, they both have to flex to get axle wrap.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Aug 3, 2004
#8
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #8
Hack said:
Well, this style of leaf would affect how the spring bends under normal loads, IMO. A traction bar would only act to prevent wrap-up under hard acceleration. I'm guessing here, but wondering whether the motion of the axle during jounce would be changed. I see the front, stiff part of the leaf creating more movement of the axle in a front/rearward direction. Could this exaggerate any rear-steer tendencies of the car? I don't know, but that would be my first concern.
Click to expand...
Both the traction bar and additional leaf help not only in hard acceleration, but also in braking.

Although not significant, there may be a slight weight advantage to the springs over the traction bars.

There should be minimal front/rear movement with any leaf spring setup. This is because the leaf essentially acts as a control arm. If any is measured, it is probably due to flex in bushings and/or rotation of the pinion under accelleration and braking.

Maier also makes the main spring thicker than most other manufacturers. So even though the rear may seem thin, it still provides more material over stock and other aftermarket springs. In addition, having the additional 1/2 leaf in addition to the thicker main spring material, should help out in any lateral deflection.

As far as making the decision to use the Maier leaf springs or traction bars is probably dependent upon the current condition of your rear suspension. For me, I have a GT Coupe with fresh HD rear springs. Although I like the Maier setup, I have no need to replace the springs. I will probably choose the traction bar approach with lowering blocks only because they are a less expensive option than replacing the springs. On the other hand, if my springs were shot, I'd get the Maier springs and call it a day.
 
C

Carizzma

New Member
May 23, 2004
11
0
0
Sep 3, 2004
#9
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #9
From the reply's it sounds like they do elminate wheel hop up.
Do they ride real stiff & harsh?
 

KillerKittyCat

New Member
Aug 24, 2003
150
0
0
Hammer Down - Behind The Wheel
Sep 3, 2004
#10
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #10
I have the original springs on the Mustang. I do not have any wheel hop issues??? I re cammed it and all it will do at WOT is spin both tires. It did it to me at 25 mph in second gear. Maybe mine are sagging so much they allow this?????
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Sep 3, 2004
#11
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #11
I have 5 leaf reverse eye, 450HP in a 66 coupe with a 9" Currie rear end.

Spin the street tires all day long through first and second 245/50's, Hook hard at the strip with Hoosier 26X9.0X15 slicks, no wheel hop in either....

No traction bars, cal tracs or anything. Is this because of the 5 leafs being so stiff?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
68 coupe rear drop
  • Butchd88
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
185
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2026
C.R.M.
M
Bent Rear Spring Perches
  • Miozu
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
426
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 8, 2025
PSKSAM2
P
O
Back in a Fox
  • Osorio299
  • Jul 24, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
93
The Welcome Wagon Jul 25, 2026
gkomo
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
353
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?