Fox Rear Seat Belts - 87-89 vs 90-93 length

dan50

Member

Mar 20, 2009

46

21

18

Cary, NC

Aug 3, 2026

#1

• Aug 3, 2026

• #1

Does anyone know the length of the non-retractor side of the rear seat belts on the 87-89 vs 90-93? Trying to understand if shifting to an 87-89 set would move the buckle further from the seat cushion. I circled the side I’m curious about. I have aftermarket belts in my 89 so I’m curious about the OEM units. Thanks!!

 

Attachments

• IMG_5996.webp

  44.8 KB · Views: 31

91AOD5.0LX

I have a slight sag in my rear

5 Year Member

Feb 20, 2021

1,085

1,026

133

Lake George NY

Aug 3, 2026

#2

• Aug 3, 2026

• #2

The OEM length in my 1991 is 12”

 

Attachments

• IMG_0261.webp

  232.6 KB · Views: 31

Reactions: dan50

dan50

Member

Mar 20, 2009

46

21

18

Cary, NC

Aug 3, 2026

#3

• Aug 3, 2026

• #3

Thanks

 

Reactions: 91AOD5.0LX

dan50

Member

Mar 20, 2009

46

21

18

Cary, NC

Aug 8, 2026

#4

• Aug 8, 2026

• #4

This one is 15”. Appears to be 87-89 rears.

 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell

Mod Dude

Feb 18, 2001

43,332

18,059

224

Massachusetts

Aug 18, 2026

#5

• Aug 18, 2026

• #5

The 90-93 buckles are shorter than 87-89, but they also bolt into a completely different area of the trans tunnel.

The older buckles (79-89) kinda bolt in more towards the rear and come over the seat cushion.

The 90-93 buckles bolt to the trans hump and come through the seat cushion, which is why they are noticeably shorter.