• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Rear springs question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fett
  • Start date Start date Jul 12, 2007

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Jul 12, 2007
#1
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #1
When I was first building my car, I opted for Ford racing springs. I forget which number they were, but they were a 1" drop in the front and a .8" drop in the rear with a fairly tight spring rate. The car sits and feels fine, but there seems to be a tad more wheel gap in the front than in the rear. I also just bought new wheels for my slicks, and the offset puts the outer edge of my 26" slicks just under the outer wheel well lip. I had to adjust my shocks so the tires wouldn't rub during my launch. Plus I have VERY little room with my 274/40/17" in the rear, with the quad shocks flipped, there is just a hair of room.

I would like to eventually go with 4.10 gears and a 28" slick, but there is no way I could get those to fit with my current setup. So I am thinking of swapping out the rear springs. I figure maybe a slightly taller spring to make the ride height a little higher in the rear, plus it would give me more room for taller slicks.

Without breaking the bank, what would be a good rear spring to go with on my DD? I would like to keep the tight feel of the car on the road, but have room for the slicks and still be able to hook at the track....something I am having a hard time doing now when I spray out of the hole.

It is an 88 Coupe, with Steeda tubular lower and fully boxed uppers with urethane bushings. Stock quad shocks, flipped. Strange adjustable rear shocks. Stock rear sway bar. 3.73 gears. Steeda full length subframe connectors.

Thanks.
b
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Jul 13, 2007
#2
  • Jul 13, 2007
  • #2
If your wanting the same ride I would go with someting like these instead of switching out to a taller spring- Part number for these from summit is GRN-GMCA7998WJ they're adjustable up to 3 inches total, or 1 inch lower or 2 inches higher and there 199.95, there are alot of differant manufacturers to choose from, I just used these as a referance. Good Luck
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Jul 13, 2007
#3
  • Jul 13, 2007
  • #3
I thought about that, but I have heard a TON of bad things about those control arms. I talked to one company today that said they stopped carrying those because they had a bad habit of breaking on people.

I do love the idea of having them adjustable, I just don't want to have any issues in the future with them not holding up.
 

COILDUP

New Member
Jun 28, 2005
36
0
0
Lakeland, TN
Jul 13, 2007
#4
  • Jul 13, 2007
  • #4
No issues with these...

http://www.maximummotorsports.com/s...e=product_info&cPath=21_91_93&products_id=523

 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Jul 18, 2007
#5
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #5
I was thinking about those adjustable style control arms, and it got me thinking...

Wouldn't an adjustable arm like those actually change the spring rate? I mean, the control arm stays where it is, and by adjusting the perch up, you are actually compressing the spring more. Wouldn't that effect the spring load?

I would think that the more you adjust the perch, it wouldn't raise the car as much as it would just compress the spring more. So for every turn of the perch you would raise the car a little, but you would also make the spring tighter.

Or am I over thinking the whole thing?
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Jul 19, 2007
#6
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #6
The spring rate is not going to change. The load on the spring (weight of the car) will be the close to the same so by moving the perch you in turn change the height of the car rather than compressing the spring. As far as springs go, I have the eibach drag launch springs in the rear. I'm told they sit a little higher, but am not sure as I had 4 cylinder springs before and know they sit higher than those.
 
G

Ghost001

New Member
Dec 9, 2002
398
1
0
California
Jul 21, 2007
#7
  • Jul 21, 2007
  • #7
I have those MM LCAs. I have the height adjusted to the maximum suggested height (2 inches above stock), and so far no problems. I've been driving that way for about a week now. Before that, I had them at about 0.5 inches above stock, and drove that way for several months.

I wanted the extra height, because I've got huge rims and tires, which were rubbing on the outer fender well when I turned onto a steep driveway from the street.

I have H&R race springs in back.

Someday, I may switch to coilovers in back. Coilovers can be height-adjusted easily, so I'm told. I'm guessing that one could even go 2 inches above stock height, with coilovers, although I don't know for sure.
 

tbovee

Member
May 22, 2006
129
0
17
Fredericksburg Va
Jul 21, 2007
#8
  • Jul 21, 2007
  • #8
Do you have rubber or poly isolators? I've been told the polys dont compress as much as the rubber one? Maybe that would give the lift you need?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
C
Suspension Rear suspension help
  • Clark302
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
346
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
Clark302
C
D
Drivetrain Will a broken s spring affect traction?
  • dqureshi06
  • Jan 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
220
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
Mustang5L5
M
Bent Rear Spring Perches
  • Miozu
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
414
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 8, 2025
PSKSAM2
P
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
339
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?