and ban the troll EddiehasleSRT Handz said:Common mods....please change my CT
mogs01gt said:and ban the troll Eddiehasle
Swarzkopf said:Well done SRT Handz!!
Eddie Haskell, go be a victim somewhere else.
git-it-83 said:So you think because you know the definition of assault, it makes you right on whether this "assailant" is justified?While the statutes defining the legitimate use of force in defense of a person vary from state to state, the general rule makes an important distinction between the use of physical force and deadly physical force. A person may use physical force to prevent imminent physical injury, however a person may not use deadly physical force unless that person is in reasonable fear of serious physical injury or death. Most statutes also include a duty to retreat (notable exceptions include Louisiana and Florida), wherein deadly physical force may only be used if the person acting in self defense is unable to safely retreat. As discussed above, a person is generally not obliged to retreat if in one's own home (for example, a person doesn't have to retreat from the living room to the kitchen, then to the bedroom, then to the bathroom).
You asked if it was a law, I provided with information which perfectly described his actions as unlawful, nothing more, nothing less. You seem to turn the argument toward me when you don't have an argument: "how do YOU know right from wrong" "i doubt YOU passed the bar" "easy for YOU to cast judgement in hindsight"----please spare me personal attacks and stick to the issue if you would be so kindgit-it-83 said:What equips you with such power to dictate right from wrong? I doubt you have passed the bar, much less have judicial authority.After all, it's easy for you to cast your judgment in hindsight and when the damaged property isn't yours.
I'd hate to think of how you'd be walked on if there were a burglary, vandalism, or other misfortune that would fall upon you or one you love. You'd say, "It's OK, I'll just rest in complacency, as vengeance means nothing to my dead heart."
OK, you bring up ME and burglary...it's not about me, but I'll bite. If someone breaks into your house, I believe you have all the power in the world to use deadly force. The reason behind this is that they have committed a serious offense in which a more serious offense could take place. That is an issue for another thread though; there are too many variables.
The issue at hand pertains to the rights of owners. If you catch someone putting gum on your car, do you have the RIGHT to beat their head in? If the gum puts you imminent physical harm than I guess you do
This is true, I had 2 friends that got their cars keyed from one end to the other and they both got new paint jobs. One of the cars was a '96 and needed it, the other guy had a new jeep and got some kinda pearl and ghost flames. Insurance paid for both.squares98 said:.
side note: I could give a f, its just a mustang, you have insurance so who gives a ****, what happens, I can also guarantee you that when all is said and done that SRT wont be in such a great mood.
Hmm, does the school not have anywhere to park? That is an important question to be answered. Secondly, why is the school involved in something that happened off school grounds? Personally I've never been to a school without parking. Either way, it is still assault.Striped5.0 said:Whats the principle going to do when it happens off grounds which was happening on a reg basis?
Go above the police....surely someone will take his bubble gum story seriously. Also, why did the guy that got assaulted say something about his sister before being attacked and why did srt call her ugly? These are question that he may want to answer. Why would this guy pick you(srt) at random? Do you two have a history? Is there more to the story than what you are telling?Striped5.0 said:Wow your stupid, the police already knew they were doing it, nothing was done about it before, do you even read the threads??
Whoa, that's very nice. He should have beat him and then shot him. That would get ultimate respect.Striped5.0 said:He did he beat his ass to a pulp
That means a lot coming from someone as rational as youStriped5.0 said:Eddie, your a spinless coward puss.
Seeing as I wasn't there, I have no idea. I also don't know the assault victims background info. I believe even you must admitt that putting gum on the keyhole of a car, and then getting assaulted, followed by being led away in cuffs just doesn't seem logical.Striped5.0 said:if your point of view is so right then why was the other guy taken away in cuffs? Seems as though the court sytem, Law, and police were on this guys side and were fine w/ him beating his ass so where exactly do you get the idea that the court system is on your side?
Eddie is fair and balanced; that tends to ruffle a few feathers.SRT Handz said:Eddie Should be mod on Ricerforums.com
EddieHaskell said:You seem to turn the argument toward me when you don't have an argument: "how do YOU know right from wrong" "i doubt YOU passed the bar" "easy for YOU to cast judgement in hindsight"----please spare me personal attacks and stick to the issue if you would be so kind
EddieHaskell said:Eddie is blinded by his own egocentrism, full of spite, and enjoys getting the last word in, even if it has no relevance. It tends to ruffle a few feathers.
Once again I'm at the center of the argumentgit-it-83 said:You call those personal attacks? Wow, what a Sally. Oh, wait--that's a personal attack. You better take your Premarin, as I sense some emotional and hormonal balance issues with you.
You must watch Queer eyegit-it-83 said:Fixed.
Oh, speaking in the 3rd person about one's self? That died in the 1980s. Sorry.
EddieHaskell said:You must watch Queer eye
Aint that somethin' thanks for sharing!!!!!!!!!!git-it-83 said:Hmmm. Don't know of that show, but evidently you must. I don't watch TV; I only view filtered media.
git-it-83 said:Oh, speaking in the 3rd person about one's self? That died in the 1980s. Sorry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?