• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rhetorical question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlangholzj
  • Start date Start date Jul 12, 2007

jlangholzj

Mustang Master
Oct 23, 2006
248
31
93
MI
Jul 12, 2007
#1
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #1
ok, so here's the deal, my mom is currently driving a 1990 crown vic (absolute lead sled) And she's thinksing of getting a new car. however, storred underneath is a 302 (not big but lager than my 289) now as i understand it, the block size for the 289 and 302 are the same. SO with that in mind, would it be worth taking the 302, overhauling it, and adding all of my goodies on my 289 to that motor; along with the (5 spd?) auto tranny, and 9" rear ( i think) and giving the pony a transplant?? it would be nice having that different transmission. ...


sooooooo, watcha think
 
6

66forfun

Member
Feb 25, 2006
260
0
16
Pittsburgh
Jul 12, 2007
#2
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #2
if yours runs good leave it be.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 12, 2007
#3
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #3
as stated, if your current 289 is running good dont mess with it. if you want the trnas on the other hand, by all means swap the AOD 4 speed in place of the old 3spd auto. oyu just need the right parts.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Jul 12, 2007
#4
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #4
I don't exactly agree.

The rear end swap isn't worth the trouble. You would need a shop you could really trust to get the pinion angle right when they weld on the new spring perches. If they need to shorten it then you will need to buy new axles as well.

Are you planing on keeping the EFI or swaping it over to a carb and then transplant it ? If you are going to do the EFI, I'd say go for it but only if you have the experience required for a heavy duty project like that. If you are going to keep it carbed, don't bother with the swap.

As for the AOD, it should be a 4 speed as rbohm said. The trans would definately be a nice upgrade from a C4, but you could provably sell the Crown Vic and get enough out of it to pay for the entire AOD swap instead of having a car that will be hard to sell siting in your drive way. I think all in all it cost me (or should I say my friend) less then $1800 to do my friends conversion which included a complete performance rebuild on the trans, brand new custome drive shaft, shifter linkage conversion parts, lokar TV/trottle brackets and trany crossmember/mount. I'm sure you could get a decent amount for the hole car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Novice needs advice on an optimal engine/computer setup
  • 02 281 GT
  • Mar 21, 2021
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
4
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 5, 2021
a91what
Engine Coil Pack Question?
  • Beau Granbois
  • Oct 10, 2012
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2012
wmburns
J
TKO / T-56 conversion questions
  • j69302
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 20, 2007
Shakin66
C4 to AOD swap
  • jlangholzj
  • Mar 22, 2009
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
32K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Apr 13, 2009
jlangholzj
302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?